Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

any advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5550 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

we've been struggling with credit card debts for some time & especially since xmas when a planned remortgage/consolidation fell thru. now thanks to mbna selling my account to link financial i found this wonderful site(ironic huh??).

it has already taken quite a weight off, knowing we're not the only ones in the same situation.

we have 5 creditors & the phone calls were almost continuous.

as we stand now mbna have sold the debt (appro 10k) to link. we have s.a.r.'d them & have just received statements. i have used the spreadsheets & they owe us £889 & 174.19 interest @ 8%. i have seen on some other threads where people are also claiming cci @28.02%, any advice appreciated.

we are currently paying £5 a month to cap one (7K), egg(3k) & morgan stanley (2.5k) although this is only a 6 month arrangement & they will no doubt be contacting me soon!!!! we are trying to arrange a debt plan with cccs but would we be better to default on all cards & let they go to dca's??

we also owe barclays £3k but they are contacting us thru mercers who seem to be part of barclays from other threads i have seen.

we have s.a.r.'d egg, ms & barclays & are still waiting for statements.

cap one have offered £239. we initially claimed £695 & £55.60 however after using the spreadsheets i get the figures to £674 & £165.41 interest, can i still reject & claim for the higher figure?

again any advice welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes you can reject their offer. As the money taken from your account was

taken unlawfully [in the eyes of just about everyone except the banks]

then you are right to expect the full 100% to be returned.

 

I notice that you haven't sent any of them a CCA request. Is there a reason

for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really you have to decide whether to claim the charges back or go down the CCA route. You can't do both.

 

As the charges are a small percentage of the debt I would suggest that you send the CCA request. If they supply a conforming copy of the agreement you can then claim the charges back. If they can't supply a copy of the agreement then you can contest the debt in its entirety (although you will not be able to claim back charges as well).

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really you have to decide whether to claim the charges back or go down the CCA route. You can't do both.

 

As the charges are a small percentage of the debt I would suggest that you send the CCA request. If they supply a conforming copy of the agreement you can then claim the charges back. If they can't supply a copy of the agreement then you can contest the debt in its entirety (although you will not be able to claim back charges as well).

 

 

Hello smiffy,

 

 

I completely agree with rory!

 

Send a CCA request, recorded delivery, to the companies that currently own the "alleged" debt.

 

Then just wait and see what they send you! (If anything).

 

They have 12 working days to send you a "true" copy of your executed agreement. If they do not, then they have defaulted, and you may then cease payments! If after a further calender month, they still have not sent you a copy of your agreement, then they have committed an offence. You may then report them to the OFT and Trading Standards, if you so wish!

 

 

Best wishes, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i read on one thread that it might be better to wait until the debt is sold to a dca & then cca them. is there more likelihood of them not having a copy?

 

I have been thinking myself that there would likely be less chance of a DCA having a copy of the CCA than the original creditor.

 

One thing to be aware of though - HFC took me directly to court, very quickly, themselves - they did not sell the debt on. I wasn't aware of all this CCA business then, so I never requested one, and still don't know if they do have one for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In practice it doesn't matter who you CCA-it is normally only the original creditor that holds the original agreement. All the DCA does when sent a CCA request is to ask the OC for a copy-which is why they often say it will take

a month or so to send the documents.

However although I said it doesn't matter which company you send it to, if

there is a DCA involved, always send it to them as it will get them off your back while they wait for the agreement from the original lender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks to all of you for your advice. rec'd a standard letter today from link finance:o so will send them a cca request.

i know this may sound stupid :rolleyes: but as link now own the debt & not mbna, could i still claim charges back from mbna or would this compromise the cca requst??

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the charges are less than the debt then it is perhaps pointless chasing them

as all that will do is educe the debt. Whereas, if you go the CCA route, it is

generally quicker and slightly cheaper to find out if the debt is enforceable or not.

If it is enforceable then you should reclaim your charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not that simple.

If the DCA has not bought the debt they cannot apply charges or interest'

If they have bought the debt, then they can charge the same rates of interest as the original creditor, providing a default or ccj has not already been applied.

If a ccj has been applied, then normally interest should no longer be charged.

However there are certain contracts that specify in their T&C's that they will continue to charge interest even after a ccj and also the creditor can make

an application to the judge at the time of the ccj asking that interest be continued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

have had a reply today from link finance dated 12/07/07, which i presume is a standard letter.

it says they have requested a copy of the agreement & most recent t & c from mbna, which may take up to 30 days. they have not made an administration charge & have used the £1 to reduce my debt(whoopy doo!!!) and ends "your account has been put on hold for the next 14 days for you to contact this office with further details as requested above"

they haven't requested any details in the letter??!! what should i do now??

Link to post
Share on other sites

what should i do now??

Absolutely nothing. The ball is now in their court.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have had a reply today from link finance dated 12/07/07, which i presume is a standard letter.

it says they have requested a copy of the agreement & most recent t & c from mbna, which may take up to 30 days. they have not made an administration charge & have used the £1 to reduce my debt(whoopy doo!!!) and ends "your account has been put on hold for the next 14 days for you to contact this office with further details as requested above"

they haven't requested any details in the letter??!! what should i do now??

 

 

Hi smiffy,

 

 

Yes this is a standard letter that they are now sending out.

 

It is interesting that they say that the account will be placed on hold for 14 days! They have already admitted that it may take up to 30 days to comply with your request, so their timescales are nonsense!

 

No CCA, no enforcement! However, they will almost certainly send another letter after the 14 days are up!

 

 

Best wishes, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I be really thick here and ask a question?:confused:

 

If a credit card company cant provide you with a cca that has been signed by both parties, does that mean you no longer have to pay that debt? and if you dont have to pay it do they default or ccj you or can they not?

 

thanks:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

 

No CCA, no enforcement! However, they will almost certainly send another letter after the 14 days are up!

 

 

Best wishes, Jeff.

 

 

Im on my 39th day from 2 days after I sent a CCA request to link (so 41 days from posting).

 

I did not recieve a letter on or around the 14th day but I did recieve a letter on the about the 25th day. Since that i have heard nothing, no letters or phone calls.

 

Keep an eye on my thread smiffy as we are in the same process but im about 4/5 weeks in front of you. Mmy time is nearly up and ill be asking for further help from the forum soon and the advice I hope to get should be useful to any future action you may need to take.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/103104-my-link-story.html#post974824

Link to post
Share on other sites

one way to stop the interest by the DCA is to persue the ccca route.

Contact the ccca for a pack and ref no. You can still try and reduce your payments while claiming your charges back.The main thing is to stop the interest now....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you mean the charity cccs sanddancer?

 

Once the creditor/DCA has defaulted on supplying a copy of the agreement they can not lawfully charge any interest on the account anyway.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smiffy, they are getting quite cunning by saying that they do not charge to supply the CCA request so are reducing your debt instead.

At times when nothing has been paid off a debt for six years, the debt

becomes unenforceable. So by putting the £1 to reduce the debt could in

certain circumstances, restart the debt for another six years.

I suggest you write back to them and say that if the service is free, then

they should return the £1 to you since it was not intended to reduce the debt-and see what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smiffy, they are getting quite cunning by saying that they do not charge to supply the CCA request so are reducing your debt instead.

At times when nothing has been paid off a debt for six years, the debt

becomes unenforceable. So by putting the £1 to reduce the debt could in

certain circumstances, restart the debt for another six years.

I suggest you write back to them and say that if the service is free, then

they should return the £1 to you since it was not intended to reduce the debt-and see what they say.

 

 

Im letting mine run its time then after the days are up im going to write a letter asking for my £1 back as they could not supply the information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...