Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Precluded from proceeding to tribunal by actions of Trade Union


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2326 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have experienced whereby the actions of my workplace union have precluded me from being able to proceed to Employment Tribunal.

 

Consequently, I am left with only the option of filing a personal injury claim against my employer, which the union will not take forward on my behalf.

 

The union has acknowledged wrongdoing, placing blame squarely at the door of their local representative and citing a lack of knowledge as the reason for the error.

 

Can anyone recommend the services of a competent legal firm with whom they've had success in this area?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have recently discovered that the actions of my workplace trade union have precluded me from proceeding to Employment Tribunal through an effective 'time-out' of the 3 month statutory time limit associated with such claims.

 

Unless I am mistaken, I have no right of appeal or means or recourse, other than to pursue a claim against my employer for personal injury and the union in question for negligence - the union has acknowledged wrongdoing, placing blame squarely at the door of their local representative and citing a lack of knowledge as the reason for the error, but refuse to take matters forward on my behalf.

 

Having performed a Google search of personal injury solicitors/legal firms (no win, no fee) practicing in this area, there are myriad options - can anyone recommend a good place to start?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Poorly Treated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry that you've paid for the privilege to have such a wonderful service.

 

My personal experience of dealing with Unison is that they will delay and lie until the cow's come home.

 

I found a law centre in Govan very helpful on advice, even though they were 50 miles from me, check and see if there's anything similar near to you.

 

Don't forget that they will try and wear you down.

 

Only you can decide how and why you fight this, whatever your decision maybe, you will hopefully find help and support here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the Solicitors Regulation Authority have a " find a solicitor" service that will match you with a local firm that specialises in the type of claim you want to take.

 

I hope that your case for personal injury is separate from the union matter in your own mind

 

as lay reps are just that and suing for bad advice or inaction will almost always fail unless there are other factors.

 

An ET is not really the place for personal injury anyway and

 

you have 6 years from the date of the event that is the subject of an action to start proceedings in the county court so plenty of time there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the facts of your case and when you discovered this error but the fact that you were given wrong advice doesn't stop you from taking the case to the Employment Tribunal.

 

You just have to prove that it wasn't Reasonable Practicable for you to have brought it in time.

 

See Remploy Ltd v Brain UKEAT/0465/10/CEA

 

Also, see El Kholy v Rentokil Initial Facilities Services (UK) Ltd UKEAT/0472/12/LA

 

You have little grounds when the person is a lay representative.

 

In order words, you didn't "pay" for his advice.

 

I know you paid your membership dues but that isn't the same as paying for legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been professional negligence claims brought because the solicitor/representative failed to issue a claim in time.

 

In order to succeed, you would have to prove that the union owed you a duty of care. You would also have to prove that you would have won damages had you filed a claim. This can be very difficult, as not many claims are black-and-white.

 

If you want to proceed you can speak to a law firm which takes on professional negligence cases, but it would only be worth pursuing if your case was worth a lot of money.

 

Out of interest, what is the nature of your employment claim? The employment tribunals do not have jurisdiction over personal injury claims.

 

I assume you have explored the option of applying for a time extension and have concluded that this is not a viable option?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...