Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard - Charges on Charges and credit limit increases


greg0818
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1874 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon,

 

In a nut shell.

Opened a BC CC in Mar 2003.

Missed a few payments which meant that i incurred Over Credit limit charges.

Over the course of the next 14 years, it escalated.

 

Despite missing payments and over credit limit charges, BC doubled my credit limit on 3 occasions, June 2009, March 2011 and March 2014.

Leading to more financial trouble for myself which was impossible to get away from at the time.

 

Finally got back on track in 2018 and managed to clear the balance, but still incurring interest and some charges.

 

Prior to each limit increase, my record with them was nothing short of abysmal, missed payments, over credit limit, when i did pay i was rarely over the miniumum payment.

38 missed payments and 48 over credit limit from 2009.

 

My question is, do i have a claim against BC for irresponsible lending?

 

Regards

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

poss not your credit file and other borrowing and defaults would dictate that.

 

however , you appear to have a good cause for a penalty charges reclaim

and a good chance at winning at court too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

use 24.9%

yes people like shelley and martin2006 went back that far.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Sorry to be a pain, but I am pretty much new to court action, so may need my hand holding on this.

 

So CI figures come out at

 

Total Charges, £1180

CI, £10767.16

 

these figures are based on actual statements for the length of the account.

Edited by greg0818
Link to post
Share on other sites

well without seeing data how would we know?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

example statement and cisheet

you can upload .xls directly via mange attachments after removing pers info.

statement as PDF

 

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Greg and welcome to CAG

 

You should reclaim as far back as you have data for.

 

However, BC may not repay now like they have historically. They may defend and use recent Case Law (some would say wrongly) to their advantage.

 

Research is the key word for now. The claim should be under £10K to stay on small claims track so using the right interest rate may help with that.

 

See the **WON** threads here for starters - https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?97-Barclays-BCard-and-Woolwich-successes

 

Most of what you need is there but you may need to adjust your tactics to take account of more recent cases, including failures.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks all good to me

is the account still live and they charged int all the way through till you settled?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning guys

 

I am just putting together the pre lim letter.

Slick, you mentioned to keep the claim below £10k.

 

If i remove the first 3 charges, it makes the figures. Charges = £1116 and CI = £8758.54. Total £9874.54.

 

Would this be ok?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What interest rate are you using on the Compound Int't spreadsheet ?

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

24.9

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I could just come in here to suggest that if you could find another way to keeping the claim to less than £10,000, it might give you more leeway, be less risky in terms of court fees and allow you to "feel the temperature of the water".

 

Firstly, the amount that you seem to be claiming is almost at the small claims limit. You certainly won't be able to add 8% interest on it because that will take you beyond the limit.

 

I'm not sure whether it is possible in your case – you will have to look at it and discuss it with the others who are helping you here. However, if you have able to consider breaking down your claim into multiple claims – each one addressing a particular chronology then your claim might be in much smaller manageable chunks. Of course, it would mean multiple claims but on the other hand it might be much more comfortable for you and also less interesting for the bank to start pulling out the big guns in order to beat you down.

 

I haven't read this thread very carefully but it seems to me that broadly there were three occasions when they raised your limit. I think that you are saying that each time they were acting irresponsibly and they should not of done so.

 

I'm wondering whether you could address each one of these specific periods in a separate claim so that you might bring a claim for, say, £2000 in respect of one particular period. Then assuming that you are successful in that one, bring another claim for another section of your chronology.

 

I don't know if this is a practical possibility in your case. I'm just suggesting another way of looking at what you are trying to do. The advantage of course would be that there would be lower court fees for each claim – although I suppose the total of three court fees would add up to more than the one large one – but at least it would be in smaller chunks. Also if you lost on one, then your exposure would be less. Also there would be a learning curve from which you would benefit for the future claims. Of course a disadvantage would be that the whole procedure could go on for 18 months or so. You need to weigh up the benefits and disbenefits.

 

As I have said, I'm not at all familiar with what you are doing and what your position is so maybe what I'm suggesting is completely impracticable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would the total claim be if you used 19.9% on the Comp Int spready.

 

Also, I see you had PPI on the a/c from the sample statement you posted above. Have you looked at reclaiming this as well ?

 

And I've moved your thread into the BC forum.

 

:-)

Edited by slick132

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That could work BankFodder.

Not sure if i would be able to do two claims though, could BC put a settlement clause in, saying that no further claims are available after the first one?

Slick may have experience of this....

 

 

At 19.9% Slick

Charges = £1180

CI = £6029.34

Total = £7209.34

Link to post
Share on other sites

All charges prior to 2009

Charges: £400

CI: £9235.53

Total: £9635.53

 

All charges after 2009 inclusive

Charges: £780

CI: £1553.49

Total: £2333.49

Edited by greg0818
Link to post
Share on other sites

no

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Greg,

 

Not essential but, for the cost of £1, why not send one anyway.

 

From the example threads, you should have already seen that a SAR with the £10 fee is sensible.

 

Make any CCA request separate to the SAR though.

 

We're working behind the scenes about interest and the claim total and will keep you posted.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Slick, DX.

 

I will send a CCA request off today.

 

I have my prelim drafted, so as soon as you guide me towards a suitable figure/split of claims, i am good to go.

 

Just looking at my HSBC account also, so will get CCA and SAR sent for those and set up a new thread in due course.

 

 

Much appreciate your guidance on this.

 

Thanks

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...