Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long does it take DM to make Decision ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm still waiting since February, after sending in the GL24, from getting Nil points in my IB to ESA Migration, I'm still on the assessment rate, still sending in Med Certs, can anyone say if this means I'm going to Tribunal or can it take this long for a DM to make contact.

 

When I called DWP call centre they have no idea where I stand, just say keep sending in Med Certs, I only want to know will I hear from a DM, or is it done deal and I'm going for Tribunal hearing, it's been hell not knowing anything.

 

Is this the norm for people, the DWP site states during the process once you submit the GL24 you will hear from the DM if they been able to overturn the ATOS points, but I've had no definite details from them, just the usual letter saying they will pay assessment rate till my appeal is looked at.

 

thanks for reading, just feeling so ill with worrying

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a backlog with reconsiderations but I wouldn't think the backlog is that big! So in my opinion I think the decision has not been changed by the DM and your claim has been referred to the Tribunal, and the Tribunal can be approx 6 months before it is heard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appealed via the GL24 in February, the DWP phoned me about six weeks later asking if I still wished to go ahead with the appeal, I said yes and the paperwork from the DWP arrived four weeks later, and the paperwork from the tribunal service a couple of weeks after that, My appeal hearing is not before 01/10/2012.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies, I'm worried as it does seem to me I would have had something by now, but when I called them they said I will hear from the DM in due course, they could not tell me if I was being sent to Tribunal or not as it does not show on their system. I'm going to phone again, I just want to get an answer as to what the DM's decision is, not just left in limbo, I thought they had to tell you not just send you to Tribunal without letting you know their decision first.

 

Osdset you say you had a call from them, that's what I mean, I've not heard a thing.

 

 

 

thanks again for your help guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

cocoriver,

Just a thought, did you state that you wanted to appeal on the GL24, or ask for a reconsideration?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi osdset, I'm not sure because I was told by DWP to go into Jobcentre for help and the GL24 was filled out by the man I saw there, he then faxed it on to the correct dept, I had no idea there was a difference, I was just told to send in a GL24 within one month of getting nil points letter, they don't offer information so if you don't no what to do it's a mine field.

I'm going to phone on Tuesday and try to find out, thanks for taking time to read my post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi osdset, I'm not sure because I was told by DWP to go into Jobcentre for help and the GL24 was filled out by the man I saw there, he then faxed it on to the correct dept, I had no idea there was a difference, I was just told to send in a GL24 within one month of getting nil points letter, they don't offer information so if you don't no what to do it's a mine field.

I'm going to phone on Tuesday and try to find out, thanks for taking time to read my post

 

Hmm, personally I would not have let someone else fill out the GL24, I take it you did not see what was written, for an appeal you normally state why you disagree with the DWP's decision, and ask for it to go to appeal.

 

I have no experience with claims migration but I know that in the case of a new claim for ESA, if a reconsideration is asked for benefits stop until the decision is made, you are still getting paid so I'm guessing he has requested an appeal.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem was when I got the letter saying I had nil points, I phoned DWP and they suggested they make an appointment for me at Jobcentre where someone would help with the forms, as it has never happened to me before I was unsure of the process. I did see the GL24 as he asked me what I'd like to be put on the form as my reasons for appeal, basically that I disagreed with the ATOS medical, Nil points etc, so that's basically what he put on the form, then faxed it off, a couple of weeks later I got a letter saying it had been received, and they would look at the decision and if it could be changed they would let me know, then I got a letter saying I would be paid assessment rate until decision on my appeal had been made.

 

I phoned and ask did that mean I was being passed to tribunal but was told, as it was not showing on the system they could not tell me, but I should hear from a DM in due course, just to keep sending med certs, that's it, nothing since then. Now in May, and very worried indeed.

 

thanks again for taking the time to read my posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so as others have said, it looks very much like the reconsideration has been done, the DM did not change the decision in your favour, so it has gone to the Tribunal. That's not great, but not a disaster either as the Tribunals do regularly find in favour of ESA claimants.

 

You may wish to read Site Team member Honeybee13's excellent sticky thread (the threads that appear in a kind of nasty greenish colour at the top of the forum) for more information about the appeals process.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Antone, yes very much looks to be that way, I realize now I never fully understood what was happening, I was waiting to hear from the DM and now think I already have, going by the letter they sent back in Feb. But when I called them to clarify either way they would not say if I was going to Tribunal as they just kept telling me it did not show on the system that I was, so it could go either way, seems to me the DM did not change the decision back in February and I've been waiting for Tribunal papers all this time without even knowing it.

 

It's just ever y thing I've read, ie DWP link to the Appeals process, states you will hear from the DM, so I stupidly thought I'd get another letter or phone call.

 

I feel really stressed that I failed to understand what was happening, it's really upset me. I don't know if I'll be able to attend the Tribunal but as everyone says, it's better to go.

 

Thanks again for your help everyone, and best of luck to you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

just a thought here, have you when you have rung the dwp about this ever been offered a call back from the decision makers? If not ring and request one. They will be able to tell you whether or not it is going to tribunal.

 

Also have you seen a copy of the assessment report that would help you emensely in your appeal arguing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is what I got told regarding the delays etc.

 

the time the appeal/letter is recieved by sorting office is recorded so they use that date to decide if you appealed on time, however fromt hat point it can easily be many weeks before a DM looks at it. Most likely your appeal is sitting in a pile waiting to be looked at, once my last appeal was looked at the DM made a decision the same day.

 

As I understand it you will know if they submitted to trbunal because when they do that you have to be sent a copy of the documents related to the case.

 

It seems the DWP have issues communicating via letters and too many people are just left waiting in silence.

 

Asking for a callback from the BDC in my experience speeds things up. As they usually will look for your stuff first before ringing you back.

 

I rememebr ringing up been told by the call centre staff not to worry as the tribunal service has delays, and I pushed to find out the DM hadnt even got to it yet. I knew from past experience of tribunals I would get documentation when it gets submitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes I've made several calls, mostly to the call centre staff, with different responses, ranging from it takes months for appeals to be looked at, to no your not necessarily going to tribunal yet, I had one call back with regard to being asked to send in a follow on med cert, I call to say it had been done but the call centre said it had not arrived so they gave me a call back, the lady that called me just took the details of the med cert and said she would update it there and then, but had no other information for me.

 

My last call, Tuesday this week, I was again told, nothing on the system saying I was going to Tribunal, can take months to be looked at and could go either way, but most people do have to go to Tribunal, just wait.

 

I may call again next week, and ask for a call back

 

thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...