shamrocker
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
1,447 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
shamrocker last won the day on May 18 2020
shamrocker had the most liked content!
Reputation
628 ExcellentRecent Profile Visitors
1,801 profile views
-
Carry on ignoring until you get a Letter of Claim.
- 151 replies
-
- parking fines
- pcn
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Cpm/BW windscreen pcns - BW PAP LOC Now Claimform - (residential car park) The citrus Building, Maderia road, Bournemouth ***Claim Dismissed with Costs** now another PAPLOC for another same place ticket ***Dismissed again with costs***
shamrocker replied to harni's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
You had a killer argument that was well supported, so it would make sense to not spend time on other arguments which are more difficult to persuade. The claimant isn't particularly clever really, and was probably just blinded by what they thought would be an easy £600 (your hard earned cash!).- 322 replies
-
- appeals
- countrywide
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Cpm/BW windscreen pcns - BW PAP LOC Now Claimform - (residential car park) The citrus Building, Maderia road, Bournemouth ***Claim Dismissed with Costs** now another PAPLOC for another same place ticket ***Dismissed again with costs***
shamrocker replied to harni's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Awesome - great stuff! They're lucky it's only £95 they owe you. Bet you're glad it's all been resolved, finally. Was there any mention of the fact the parking space is not on land managed by the claimant?- 322 replies
-
- appeals
- countrywide
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Cpm/BW windscreen pcns - BW PAP LOC Now Claimform - (residential car park) The citrus Building, Maderia road, Bournemouth ***Claim Dismissed with Costs** now another PAPLOC for another same place ticket ***Dismissed again with costs***
shamrocker replied to harni's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Good luck!- 322 replies
-
- appeals
- countrywide
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Well done! This is more than likely the end of it, but you should check with the court at some stage that they've officially discontinued. They can still chase you for the debt, and they might, but you can just ignore. If they were to issue proceedings again, you can refer to this case in your submissions - it won't reflect very well on them if their case is similar to this time. The chances of them trying again are probably slim though.
-
Lowell Claimform - Shop Direct cat debt ***Claim Dismissed***
shamrocker replied to johnbomo's topic in Legal Successes
Ok, as long as you've satisfied yourself that how you're angling it puts you on a firm footing. A lot of people read stuff but often don't understand how to use it. Good luck! -
Lowell Claimform - Shop Direct cat debt ***Claim Dismissed***
shamrocker replied to johnbomo's topic in Legal Successes
Have you read any other forum threads where the claimant disclosed the same type of screenshot and it was not deemed sufficient by the judge? -
Admission of something is one thing, but is it legally enforceable?? I sense they wouldn't be quoting an online forum if their case was watertight. Would be interesting to see what they've disclosed.
-
Lowell Claimform - Shop Direct cat debt ***Claim Dismissed***
shamrocker replied to johnbomo's topic in Legal Successes
johnbomo - how do you rate your chances with this, in view of the evidence put forward by the claimant? -
It's nothing to do with me. I just found it on a parking tickets group that I keep an eye on (albeit I far prefer the tone and content of CAG on this subject - by a long shot) and, as it had originated on MSE forum, I would expect there'll be some updates posted on there. I haven't had a chance to look yet, but I can't imagine it being too hard to find. It's a good one though. I have to say, it all felt a bit surreal when I read it. You become accustomed to the constant fear of 'judge lottery' and then along comes this little beauty to brighten up your day.
-
Glad you seem to be enjoying the read! Just a word of caution, the person who posted this warned against naming individuals as it's likely the affected companies will lean on the forum to take the material down. I don't know how valid this is, but I'll say it anyway and leave it to admin to advise accordingly. It's great to see these shysters taken to task though.
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.