Jump to content

welshandproud

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

799 profile views
  1. Morning.. i've had Idems WS when i got home on friday.. over 80 odd pages covering a few old CC statements from lloyds, statements of payments to idem via stepchange, and copys of letters they sent to me since they bought the debt. copys of "A" Credit Agreement but still no true signed copy of the Credit Agreement. the copies still have the wrong address from when the ACC was opened. copys of everything idem sent with their WS, couldn't get them as 1 file. Claimant_WS+exhibits.pdf
  2. the last paper work i had from them was in post #56 the copys of the CC statements i forgot that they had sent them aswell they've not replied to the CPR, yes to the CCA but no signed T&C and the wrong address on it
  3. The statements are on Lloyds paperwork. about 8 weeks ago in form of statements but only 4 of them.
  4. the debt is for a CC the sent me copys of 4 CC statements dated 12/2004, 01/2005, 10/2010 and 11/2010 the hearing is the 31st of this month
  5. the debt was decreasing but only by small amount each year.. it was step change that wanted me to increase payments, but i could not afford to increase payments, then they dropped me.
  6. the debt was decreasing but only by a small amount each year, there was about 6 different accounts on the step change managment.. i'll take the applications bit out.
  7. many thanx for your link to your post, at the time i had many accounts with Lloyds, but not knowing what account these guys had got. Morning while sort through paperwork i found 4 CC statements that idem sent to me, but they also said that they've sent all the account copys to me dated 12/2004, 01/2005, 10/2010 and 11/2010 i've done the witness statement this morning is this ok? Witness Statement In The *******County Court Claim No. ********* **************Claimant and *************** Defendant I am the defendant in this case and make this Witness statement in support of my defence in this claim. The matters set out below are within my own knowledge, except where I indicate to the contrary. 1. It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed ...10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Idem Capital securities issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit. 2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchase’s debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party. 3. I accept I have in the past had financial dealings with Lloyds Bank. I do not recall the precise details of the agreements but do recall it was on or about the year 2004/5. 4. I had been paying regular monthly payments via Step Change a debt management company up until 11/06/2018, I ceased payments once the debt management company terminated my case due to being with them for 8 years and my payments not increasing. 5. After seeking advice this led me to check all paperwork I held with creditors, from this I could not find any Credit Agreement relating to the account the claimant is referring to. 6. I have therefore sought clarification and requested copies of the agreements from the claimant by way of a section 77 request and a request pursuant to sec 61 B of the CCA1974 for the amalgamated alleged amount. (EXHIBIT 1) 7 A Section 77 request was sent on 25/01/2019 via royal mail signed for and shows as received on the 28/01/2019. The claimant to date has failed to comply to my Section 77 request in full. The Claimant acknowledged by letter dated 08/02/2019 stating to have executed a copy of credit agreement and statement of account (EXHIBIT 2) 8.The claimant claims that a Default Notice was issued in 2010 but has not provided a Default Notice (EXHIBIT 3) 9.The claimant provided a copy of account sale agreement for the sale of debts. This paper works has no name address or account number on it. (EXHIBIT 4) 10. This claim bought by the claimant is I believe without merit and an abuse of court process. The claimant holds no valid documentation that can substantiate their claim this being:- · No Termination Notice · No signed and dated Credit agreement · No valid default Notice · A Reconstituted Notice of assignment It would be far gracious and forthright for the claimant to admit that all the paperwork is a collection of copy and pastes in an attempt to convince the court that the claimant can disclose the legal valid documents on which its claim relies on. 11. I contest that the documents I have received do not meet the requirements and prescribed terms of a legal binding credit agreement, and that the claimant has acknowledged that they are unable to produce an agreement and are unable to enforce. Having regard to the above it is respectfully requested that the claimants application is denied. I believe that the that the facts stated in the witness state are true Signed. Dated.
  8. Morning Guys i checked with the court this morning, and they've paid the fees, so off to court i go on the 31st of this month, to say i'm bricking it is an under statement.. I've still not had a true singed copy of the T&Cs, just 2 differant ones both with the wrong address on them, and no Default notice , to which the admit they dont have it.. what paperwork do i need to take to court? and do i have to send it to both of them again before the 14 days? here is my Defence, this is what i sent off to the courts and idem on the 7/4/19. any pointers would be a great help. 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of the claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5(3) in relation to any particular allegation to which is specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted I have in the past had financial dealings with Lloyds.That being a Loan Agreement and a Current Account with overdraft facility,neither of which had a credit limit to the value the claimant purports to be allegedly outstanding.I do not recall the precise details of the agreements but do recall it was on or about 1998.I have therefore sought clarification and requested copies of the agreements from the claimant by way of a section 77 request and a request pursuant to sec 61 B of the CCA1974 for the amalgamated alleged amount. 3. Paragraph 2 is noted but denied as I have never been served with a Notice of Assignment pursuant to sec 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925. 4. Paragraph 3 is noted but given the claimant is and remains in default of a section 77 and unable to provide a copy of the agreements and terms and conditions its pleadings are irrelevant and unsubstantiated. 5. Paragraph 5 is denied for the reasons stated in my point 2.The original creditor could not possibly serve a valid Default Notice for the alleged agreement referred to as the alleged debt is a combined amalgamated amount from a Loan Agreement and Current Account Overdraft.Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose and evidence the service of a Default Notice pursuant to sec87(1) of the CCA1974 for the fixed loan content and also a Notice served under Sections 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA1974 for the Current Account Overdraft content. 6.Notwithstanding the above, requests for information pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974 (section 77) and CPR 31.14 were made. A Section 77 request was sent on 27/11/2018, and shows as received 28/11/2018. A CPR 31.14 request was sent 27/11/2018 and shows as received 28/11/2018. The claimant has still not complied to my Section 77 request, but in a previous letter dated 13/12/2017 the claimant acknowledged they were unable to supply a copy of the agreement and acknowledged until they could do so the agreement cannot be enforced. The claimant has yet to comply to my CPR 31.14 request. Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to: (A) show how the Defendant has entered into agreement/s ; and (B) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for and provide evidence of credit limits: and (C) evidence any nature of breach and show service of a Default Notice and Notice served under Sections 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA 1974. Notice of Sums in arrears pursuant to the CCA 1974 (D) show how the claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim. 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt as alleged it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  9. Doesn't say that they are using a sols, got a name of a litigation officer at bottom of page 2, so I'll address it to him? Plus a copy to the court? The date is set for the 31st of January.
  10. i've now edited all my details, i hope.. cant see any where that says the defendant must by? edit-merged.pdf
  11. i must admit that i'm really bad at anything like this? is there anything else i must do?
  12. sorry my defence was in post 35.. i've confused myself with it all. so i just gotta sort mt paperwork out and put it in order, then sit back and hope they bail out.
  13. so that was post #35.. i'm not sure if i sent a copy to idem? should i send 1 to them just in case?
×
×
  • Create New...