Hi I bought 2 sofas from an independent furniture store. One was faulty on delivery, the retailer (after a bit of a fight) agreed to replace both the faulty sofa and the matching non-faulty one. About 1 year after the replacements were delivered the sofa model which was faulty the first time, developed another similar fault. After an independent report confirming it was a manufacturing fault I rejected it under Consumer Rights Act and asked for a refund. The retailer has accepted this, with a slight reduction for the 1 years use. I am trying to reject the other (non-faulty) sofa as well, but retailer is refusing to budge saying they were sold separately. I disagree as I think they were sold as a matching set - same 'range', ordered and delivered at the same time, to the same specification, and retailer has already accepted this when they originally agreed to replace both sofas even though only one was faulty. Any advice on where I stand legally? Thanks

It will take up more of my time as the person recruited is a trainee, so I will have to train them up into quite a complex and organisation specific role. At the same time I have been asked to spend half my time on 2 new large projects - these are completely new to me an the organisation (and not in my JD)

Thanks - yes there are people doing a similar role to me and only line managing 2 people. My core tasks and responsibilties have also changed as I have been asked to spend half my time on two new projects, which is partly what the original post reporting to me is meant for.

Just wondering if the following would\could amount to a material change in a job description?: I currently have line mangement responsibility for 2 individuals, which is explictly stated within my written job description. My employer wants to increase this to line management responsibilty for 3 individuals (with an associated increase in the remit of my role) without formally changing my JD, grade or pay - they are using a threat of capability proceedings to coerce me into this. Thanks

An update - UKPC have given up. Keeper followed the advice on MSE and appealed as the keeper on day 25. UKPC issued a late and POFA non-complaint NTK on day 59. They then failed to respond or issue a POPLA code within 35 days of the initial appeal (as the BPA Code of Practice sets out they must). So keeper complained to the BPA and DVLA. Then 2 days later UKPC cancelled the charge as a 'gesture of goodwill'.

I have also attached some photos. One from UKPC showing car with sign in the background and one from UKPC of the sign saying no roadway parking. UKPC have other photos of just the car I haev also attached my own photos of the entrance to the estate, the entrance to the road where the car was parked (Alcock Crescent) with an arrow indicating its placement. Also my own photo of the sign. UKPC Photos redacted.pdf

Thanks, See attached UKPC PCN - Front.pdf UKPC PCN - back.pdf

Thanks, that is exactly what the driver thought - i.e. restrictions were for space beyond sign in Samas. The car was reversed round the corner from the Samas way entrance, into Alcock Crescent, and then parked a little way back from the corner, on the right hand side of Alcock Crescent as you drive into it (or left if you reverse into it as was the case), opposite the grassy area before the parking spaces. Tickets are at the following URL (I can't post direct as don't have 10 posts.)

1. The date of infringement? 17/2/19 2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] N have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) n/a Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? n/a, but photos available online 3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] n/a 4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] n/a 5 Who is the parking company? UKPC 6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Alcock Crescent (Vickers Green Estate), Crayford, DA1 4LX Ticket says they operate under BPA ……………………….. Hi received a windscreen ticket from UKPC for parking on the road. In a residential estate, but on a road, not a car park. No markings, yellow lines on the road and wasn't blocking anyone or any entrances. A not very obvious sign parallel to the road saying "No Unauthorised Parking" which looked like they were for the parking bays, but on closer inspection after receiving the ticket say 'no roadway' parking in very small letters. They have photos showing car with a blurry sign in the background on other side of the road, plus a close up photo, taken at an extreme upwards angle (blurry, can't really read what it says - my own photo is much better) Considering whether its worth an appeal or not, any help appreciated. Thanks