Many thanks Michael. Received notification today that the ticket has been cancelled! Thank you so much for your help.

Wow Thank you Michael, that's very kind of you. Hopefully they won't refuse the challenge otherwise I'll be needing your help with all the signage information. I will keep you informed of the outcome and thank you again.

Thank you DragonFly 1967...… Good job someone's on the ball!!

Hi Michael, thank you again. Bear in mind my photos were obviously taken the following day and indeed their photo was taken the morning after I had parked. The cones were not there when we parked and you can see the majority are up by the barriers. The area has been used as storage for virgin works in the area. Does it mean then that every time they want permission to suspend bays they need to list it on the link you provided and request permission from DfT? Do I go with the 'bays' argument then? can I comment that its not listed? and how about it being under the branches although by their image you wouldn't think it? Regards pix2.pdf

Thank you Michael Browne. here pix .pdf

Hi everyone, hope someone may be able to help. On Thursday 20th July around 11pm we parked in a bay, alongside a few other cars. (We have parked before so were aware of the bay regulations 9-5 Mon-Fri 4 hr no return 4 hr). Part of the bay was cordoned off with red barriers, but no barriers where we parked. On Friday morning at 8.30am returned to car to find a PCN with code 21 (observed 8:06am-8:08am). Looked for a sign only to find one partially obscured by branches from a tree and attached to a lamp post not the existing parking regulation sign, was attached with cable ties and had twisted round slightly and therefore was clearly visible in the dark. On inspection of the sign it states that 'bays o/s 47-49 Addington St' are affected, I'm going to assume that o/s means outside. The erected red barriers are outside of those flat numbers numbers and we were parked further along the bay in front of a wall to a car park. Can anyone help as to whether we have a good case for appeal against this PCN. Can't seem to attach any photos. Many thanks.