Jump to content

PIXeL_92

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    236
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

PIXeL_92 last won the day on December 19 2019

PIXeL_92 had the most liked content!

Reputation

74 Excellent

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

2,509 profile views
  1. @Andyorch - Just an FYI if you open a raw PDF that has had the marker tool used over it you can still just open in Firefox, highlight the text and copy it out. Would suggest digital PDFs like this is to "print" them as a PDF then edit over them.
  2. It was for £1600 and it is this one (sorry got the name wrong); BLACKPOOL ROOFING SERVICES LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK BLACKPOOL ROOFING SERVICES LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history... To be fair I have actually just had a call off the guy after I messaged him on WhatsApp, and he has actually agreed to make it right, turns out the two numbers I had been trying numerous times were for the "face of the company" (who has gone into hiding and caused the owner all the backlash resulting in him to just close the company,) but not the owner I only called him twice when the issue first appeared and the call didn't connect so assumed he had disconnected him number so didn't think to message him at the time. I will see if he actually comes round to put this temporary solution in place as promised, whilst we wait for the weather to calm down so the roof can come off and go back on safely. I will try and keep post up to date.
  3. Hi All, Flat roof leaking where it butts up to pitch due to incorrect installation of flat roof (confirmed by surveyor.) Paid for on the 2/11/22 via BACs after getting digital invoice. Company is active on CH but has active proposal to strike off (Blackpool Roofing Company LTD,) and they are radio silent no calls, emails being answered and they have moved out their office space. I am right in assuming as it was a BACs payment I can't request a chargeback from the bank and will have to go down small claims route before the strike off is granted? Thanks
  4. No worries, Can I use the report I was given by the approved installer that came out both times to repair and then remove the charger (this was instructed to Rolec EV by Boxt the first time round,) or would I have to get them to come out independently again to do a new report? Thanks
  5. Before I send them an email to get the ball rolling I just want to make sure I am getting it right. Fault is the car will charge for 15-30 minutes then cut out and will only start charging again if I flip the fuse in the consumer unit. Boxt are the suppliers Rolec EV are the manufacturers Ordered via Boxt - 7/04/2022 Installed via approved installer - 13/04/2022 First Fault Reported to Boxt - 23/02/2023 (no reply to this email, fault was very intermittent at this point.) First Fault chased up to Boxt / Rolec EV - 24/05/2024 (fault was now happening every time it was used.) Engineer out - 16/06/2024 (suspected faulty part ordered.) Part replaced - 24/06/2024 Second Fault Reported to Boxt / Rolec EV - 03/07/2024 (Same issue as before) Rolec EV Suggest return to base repair - 03/07/2023 Installer Collects EV Charger - 20/07/2023 Installer returns to re-install repaired EV Charger - 03/08/2023 Third Fault reported to Rolec EV - 20/08/2023 (Exact same fault as before.) Called Boxt to ask for a refund due to lack of support from Rolec EV and the fact it has had two failed repairs, they have said I would have to deal with RolecEV as the 3 year warranty is with them as a manufacturer and they only offered a 1 year installation warranty. - 21/08/2023 I have had the car checked by the manufacturer and I have no other issues with any other chargers, I have had a mate use my charger and they have the same issue. I got it installed to avoid the higher cost of using public chargers however I am now having to resort to using them exclusively. So to confirm should I be going to the supplier over the manufacturer for a refund and would it be a full refund as it was first reported in the 12 months of operation? If it was to go down the small claims route could I also request the price difference in home and public charging also be paid? Thanks
  6. Both these comments come across as if it's your address that the items are being sent too. I'm assuming these are online marketplace (eBay) sales that have gone wrong? The problem you will have is if it is buyers that have opened dishonest claims and items have actually been delivered and RM can prove this then you have no case against them, you will be able to use RMs proof of delivery to potentially go after the dishonest buyers however.
  7. In a few of your posts you are making it out as they are being shipped to your address. Surely you can claim back from the sellers if these purchases and then they can chase Royal Mail.
  8. Something to ask, the seller states they will send out a replacement item in the message dated the 9th of June that you replied to on the 22nd of June, saying it (the replacement) should be with you by the following Monday, did that ever turn up? Also you are covering your name in the main body of the message and not the preview line in the message heading.
  9. Did you pay with PayPal funds or a card. As you have proof of non delivery and eBay are unwilling to listen you could initiate a chargeback via the bank as long as you paid by card and not PayPal balance.
  10. You say that it was sent internationally. Did you send direct to the buyer or use eBay's GSP service where you send to a UK hub and they forward it on. You may actually have some cover if you sent it to their hub as you could argue the "issue" (although I suspect this is just a common eBay scammer,) occurred in transit from GSP Hub to the buyer and at that point it would be eBay that would of had to refund the buyer and if the buyer was stating the box was empty eBay will actually have details of the parcel ie the weight.
  11. @whitelist Dogs off the lead attacking another animal even with it being instinctual or not would be considered dangerous / out of control and in most cases if they can't be recalled / restrained and they cause injury they will be found at fault even if the animal they are attacking causes injury in defence. We have had two different instances of off lead dogs attacking ours, the first time he was bitten and we had to go through the courts to recoup costs of vet bills etc and the second time I was actually bit first and that is when the police got involved as that is when it is considered assault when a human is involved (not that this part applies here.) A court could also decide that your dog is dangerously out of control if either of the following apply: it attacks someone’s animal the owner of an animal thinks they could be injured if they tried to stop your dog attacking their animal However animals are considered property so as the police have said it is a civil matter and not criminal. The fact that you said they chased the cat and you didn't see the incident they can't have been under reasonable control by the owner as they would have been out of sight at the time of the attack.
  12. @unclebulgaria67 - Shall do, she is just waiting to see if anything comes through the letter box. @Anawilliam850 - The driver behind my partner made a statement (even though she wasn't involved technically) to the police that stated that my partner braked and the car kept going as she was able to react to her brake lights and reduction in speed in plenty of time to not go into the back of her and leave enough of a gap too.
  13. So it's all being dealt with via the insurance however we think one of the parties (one at the front that got tapped by the middle car) is claiming for way more damage than they actually received. The problem is because the tac ops said to my partner don't speak or approach the other parties as its an investigation they wouldn't let her take pictures but said they would. We have asked for these pictures but they said they aren't in a position to provide them, can we request these legally? The police also mass emailed all involved with everyone's car details and home addresses, I did go to the address to get pictures of the damage and some of what they are claiming for is not present on the rear of the car. Would these be enough evidence to prove they are making a false claim or because of the large gap of time could they say they have already had some repair work done?
  14. Never having to make a claim before we weren't sure if % of liability would decrease now increased premiums for her. The main thing she is worried about is getting prosecuted, she has managed to take a 3 minute clip off the dash cam and forward it to the police to back up her version of events. The whole whole 3 minutes up to the point of impact shows her driving with care and attention, maintaining safe distances and adjusting speed for the car that cut in front from the filter lane at speed. She is going to take it to the garage to have the bumper taken off to see if its caused any frame issues / radiator damage and at the same time get them to check the brakes as she is addiment that the car kept going after emergency braking and the ABS kicking in despite only going (according to the dash cam) 19 MPH. It is what it is at this point the main thing is no one was hurt.
  15. They have requested it. I'm going to get it off the SD Card this morning and forward it too them as my partner recorded the screen of it replaying at first. The police have now forwarded all the details of all drivers involved on and looking at the front CCTV cameras last night, someone has come onto my property and started poking at parts on the front of my partners car and you can hear a snapping noise in the audio whilst they have been doing something to the front of it. When the sun comes up going to see what's gone on.
×
×
  • Create New...