Jump to content

djcuts

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    91
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. Hi BankFodder. I have not sent the email response to them as yet, so I can amend before I do. Their email response was to the same letter which I sent in the post originally as per #34. Do think I should i just return as per pages 1 and first half of page 2 and remove "The pack I returned, I believed, was for you to search for PPI not acceptance of you to submit a complaint on my behalf or any fee associated" and thereafter? Regards DJC
  2. Hi I have an email respinse from TGC complaints which I have attached along with my drafted response. Any comments, as always, are greatly appreciated. Thanks and Regards DJC S_TGC_Response 2.pdf
  3. Hi BankFodder I don't think anyone can save me from myself. I just seem to always make things difficult for myself. I have not received anything other than what I have posted so they have not supplied me with any of the full information as part of the SAR. They have basically ignored that request as far as I can tell and only sent that one photocopy of the LOA and the demand for payment that came with it.
  4. Basically the only thing I ever sent them was the pack in September. Insteady of putting 02/09/18 on the forms, like an idiot, I put 02/07/18 (or they have doctored the forms but it looks like my writing...) So I made a mistake on the date, and I'm not quite sure what I can do about that now, but the forms were signed, sent and received by them early september.
  5. Hi After going over it and trying to figure out what happened as I couldn't understand how I had sent them anything before the pack I returned, I now realise I had put the 7th instead of the 9th on the forms. I completed them in early september and then sent them off. I am pretty stupid on 2 levels. Putting the wrong month down as well as going with a CMC in the first place. I am going to dispute the date in the form as it was put in incorrectly and the fat they received it in september should prove that but I don't know how that will go. Any Ideas where I would stand in that? I made a mistake on the forms and if I had put the proper date on them (2nd September 2018) I would be protected by the new law. You can bet your bottom dollar that a mistake that meant they couldn't benefit from they would dispute till they are blue in the face, but the other way round.... I'll let you know how I get on. Regards DJC.
  6. Hi guys. So I have had a response from TGC and it doesn't look like good news. The pack I sent back to them looks like I did sign a letter of Authority for the Halifax, and dated 8 days before the Guidance and Claims Act 2018 was enforced. In the attachment we have: page 1 - The LOA, this must have been in the pack and I didn't realise this was an LOA, I'm not sure what was in the pack but I thought it was just details to agree for them to search for PPI. Page 2 - Their letter saying that I am still tied into paying them the high percentage fee.... Page 3 - Texts showing that they received the pack on 14th September 2018 and that they located the PPI on the 22nd September 2018. Page 4 - Email dated 22nd September 2018 showing they located PPI for Halifax. Page 5 - Email 12th October 2018 showing they submitted complaint to Halifax. So my questions now are 1. If they had a letter of Authority for Halifax already, why did they send me an LOA for each of the claims (Credit card x 2 and Loan x 1)? These are the ones in the attachment in post #15 pages 3 + 4 (this was just a scan of one of the 3 x letters of authority for each Halifax claim, which I never sent back to them). 2. Even though they have an LOA signed by me dated before the 10th July 2018, Discovery of PPI, submission of the complaint and their request for payment fall after this date, does this still tie me into paying the full requested payment? Really gutted if this means I now have to pay them the full amount. Any advice on this would me much appreciated. Thanks and regards DJC. TGC_3a.pdf
  7. Hi I haven't spoken to them since the intitial contact (before I realised I was being connecd) other than today on the landline, and previoulsy I have not recorded any calls. I only have the facility to record calls on my mobile, which i will do if I do speak to them on my mobile at any time in future. Regards DJC
  8. Hi Just sent again recored delivery. After speaking to the Lady in the post office she says that you cannot track signed for, you just see an entry in the tracker for them accepting it and then when it is signed for. Sometimes if there is no one there to sign for it, it will simply just be posted (they shouldn't do this but it happens). So it is possible that they have the first letter, or that it will turn up (probably at the same time as the second letter....). Moral of the story is, if there is anything in their valuable, sensitive etc, you should pay the extra for special delivery..... On another note, just had a call off TGC on the landline, just told them that I have sent letter / email and I am awaiting a response for that before politley hanging up . Regards DJC
  9. Hi BankFodder. I have all the texts they have sent me, and the call logs from their attempted phone calls to my mobile. I have just now emailed them to their payments and complaints email addresses. I will get another copy of the letter sent to them, last time I used one of their return envelopes, this time I’ll just use a normal one. Thanks, and regards DJC TBC_2a.pdf
  10. Hi Just an update. I sent the letter on 19th December, when I track the item with Royal mail on the website or phone it still hasn't been delivered, I guess there is a delay with the Christmas deliveries and all In the meantime I have been ignoring their calls to my mobile and landline, but this morning I have had a text of them saying "Reminder: Payment is now overdue. To arrange payment and avoid any further action please click **** or call us on ****. Regards DJC
  11. Hi guys Thanks again. I agree with you BankFodder. I do not see how a contract that has an element within it that is illegal not rendering the whole contract invalid and unenforceable. Also here you need to remember that I have not signed anything and at worst is a contract based on a verbal agreement where what I was agreeing to was never cited. If they had read out all the terms and conditions and then I agreed then maybe that would be a different matter, or even asked if I had read and understood and agree to the terms and conditions in the paperwork they sent me. But this never happened. I will send the letter as originally and kindly suggested by By BankFodder in post #21. As soon as I hear anything back I will update the thread. It It would certainly be interesting to see what they say about why they think they can charge 30%. Thanks as always DJC
  12. Hi BanFodder Thanks for this, I will get this letter out ASAP recored delivery and let you know the outcome. The only thing I would say is that there is no mention here of my querying that I have actually signed and returned any kind of contract to them whereby I agreed to their fees in the first place. Should I not mention that in this letter as it sounds like I am accepting that I have agreed to their fees, just disputiing the ammount. Regards DJC
  13. Thanks DX. So where it says they can charge you when PPI was identified as being there, as I never engaged with them until well after 10th July 2018, I take that for the black horse finance claim they are still bound to the 20% cap and to also provide evidence that this 20% of whatever that payment will be should reflect a reasonable rate for the work which has been carried out? In terms of the Halifax claim, I am not sure if I specifically said to them that I am happy for them to act on my behalf (I was shopping in Aldi when they called, and they fielded a lot of questions) so if I did where do I stand on that? I know for a fact they did not read out any terms and conditions or the amount of any fees, but I could have well agreed to them acting on my behalf over the phone. Regards DJC
  14. Hi Bank Fodder. Thanks for the response. I will send today the below: -------------------------------------------- To whom it may concern With regards to your letters dated ********* with relation to the references ********* Can you please provide evidence of the following: What I have signed that states I agree to this 30% fee. That you explained to me that a 30% fee was applicable. That you informed me that this is something I could have done myself. Also, can you explain why you are purporting to levy a charge well over the statutory 20% cap - and in any event well over the requirement of the Act that CMC PPI reclaim fees should reflect a reasonable rate for the work which has been carried out. In addition to the above I require you to provide me with a complete detailed schedule of works that you have carried out including any correspondence sent and received relating to my claims and any internal correspondence. Yours faithfully ********* Please let me know if you think this is ok. Again, really appreciate the support on this Regards DJC
×
×
  • Create New...