Jump to content

Homer67

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    1,220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Homer67 last won the day on July 24 2022

Homer67 had the most liked content!

Reputation

427 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. In fact block their number and report their text as spam.
  2. As the parking charge reason appears to be a 13 minute overstay I'd say this one has got not chance in Court as the minimum allowance is 10 minutes so they are trying it on because the car park was busy and it took you an extra 3 minutes to get out. Write the snotty letter and post it up here before you send it to be checked and stay off FMOTL wibble wobble sites, that pathway leads to nothing but trouble.
  3. Isn't the NTK way out of time to create keeper liability or have I missed something?
  4. I am very sorry you have been through this and I hope that the CCTV evidence will be admitted in court and if it does show what's described above, I would expect that to be GBH rather than ABH which holds a much more serious punishment.
  5. Call or visit the pub and tell them to call off their dogs, they wil say it's out of their hands but it isn't, they can and should tell EuroCP to cease action. Get on the Pub's social channels and do the same if they don't respond favorably to your visit/call
  6. Thanks all, I thought it wasn't but best to check and that's what I've told them, the PAPLOC has to come from the PPC (Euro Car Parks in that case) so they can safely ignore anything from DR+
  7. Dealing with this for a friend after the usual plethora of begging letters they have received this, is it a properly worded LBA or just another begging letter? 2024-01-31 DR+ Threat-o-gram PCN 2023-09-05.pdf
  8. Do you own or rent your property? Whoops missed it, you do own it so you need t go the legal route as DX said
  9. I see Andy has responded so I'll delete this.
  10. That letter is a joke! It quotes the value of goods stolen (but they weren't) It quotes the value of goods recovered as £0 but they were fully recovered as they were never actually stolen as in removed from the store! Then it quotes 'Security Cost' so that's for Security to do their job, why would you be responsible for paying their wages?! Hilarious, ignore and don't worry about it.
  11. I think that's what I'd do, try and make sure you have a bolt hole though.
  12. When was the last date a payment was made and what was the default date (first failed payment)? In the meantime just ignore the letters and if they do call video them and tell them to leave or just ignore them.
  13. That's what I meant by 'nothing legal'. If you refused to move out until a certain date and offered the same rate of pro rata rent I think the legal/illegal edges would be blurred, after all how long does it take to actually get someone evicted? Giving you a date to leave and evicting you are two different things.
×
×
  • Create New...