Jump to content

bmw222000

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. Thank you dx100uk what happens after that? I'm sure I done one for my ppi years ago but I don't think I done it for bank charges would it be possible to try and claim for both at the same time?
  2. Hi I've been reading about claiming money back for this type of account! I was advised to take this account out when money was stolen from my account and I've been paying it for quite some time but never had any of its so called benefits! I even pay Rac for my breakdown cover so I've no use for it to be honest! How would I go about claiming it back or even can I?
  3. Sort of BUT I haven't done any work for this employer for at least 6 months? But they must still have my details on record!
  4. yes mate thats exactly whats happened
  5. it wasnt off them it was some recovery agency or some thing! asking me to repay in full, they didnt sent the letter recorded post which is odd well i think it is
  6. ive had £1300 paid into my bank account by an employer i used to work for about 6 month's ago i received a letter today telling me to return the fund's! but ive spend some of the money thinking it was my ppi claim, where do i stand with this, i don't know what to do?
  7. bmw222000

    Ebay!!

    i sold 2 pair's of 3d glasses to a bloke on ebay he left me perfect feedback then contacted me 4 week's later saying ooops ive just opened a pair and there broke but the other pair was fine! i said whatever you have had them from a month any thing could have happened to them so he opened a dispute against me now ive just recieved a email saying he has won the case he has to send them back for a full refund even though he has been wearing at least one pair there a total **** take!! is there any thing i can do about this? ive phoned them and got no sense out of them!
  8. Should I send it recorded then they can't say they didn't recieve it?
  9. also would it be best for me to send this recorded?
  10. here's a one ive found ive added a bit do you think it would be ok to send? The DVLA has issued me with a "penalty" for allegedly not registering my vehicle as SORN. The vehicle was part exchanged with a garage who filled in there part of the v5c and it was given back to me which i posted first class to the DVLA. By virtue of the fact that the DVLA method of trial is a computer database and the postal system, I consider that the DVLA is acting Ultra Vires by attempting to extort monies from me without due legal process, as is my right under article 6 of the human rights convention and under the Bill of rights 1689. The DVLA is not a Court of Law nor is it a competent authority for the following reasons: Article 6 of the given European Convention on Human Rights provides that - "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice." The said appeals service offered by the said DVLA is not established in accordance with law, as required by the said Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights - in that: The basic laws of the United Kingdom as provided within the Common Law of the Kingdom of England with the Principality of Wales and the province of Northern Ireland, and as further enacted by the Crown and Parliament of the United Kingdom to the purpose of establishing and preserving the Civil Liberties of all people living within the territories of the United Kingdom – which Common Law may not be repealed and which Statute Law remains un-repealed - have been and are now being violated by the provisions of such enactment as now claims to provide lawful authority for the existence and conduct of the DVLA, but which fails to provide any such lawful authority, because of the given violations to Constitutional Laws and Provisions which retain the force of law. In evidence of the submission given, a full reference is made to the text of the Common Law Charter of King Henry III, dated 1225 (the existence of which Charter is now evidenced by the text of the 1297 enactment of King Edward I and his parliament), and a further full reference is made to the several texts of the Declaration & Bill of Rights (variously dated February & December of 1689) – which latter documents now serve to define and restrict the powers of the Crown in Parliament, to the purpose of preserving Peaceful Government under the Rule of Law, Article 234 (formerly Article 177), of the Treaty establishing the legal entity that is now known as the European Union now provides - that the European Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning - (a) the interpretation of the Treaty; (b) the validity and interpretation of acts (entered into) by the institutions of the Community and/or by the European Bank; © the interpretation of the statutes of bodies established by an act of the Council, where those statutes so provide. Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court of Justice to give a ruling thereon. Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decis- ions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court of Justice. Magna Carta of 1225, confirmed by the Statute of 1297. "We will not pass upon him, nor [condemn him], but by lawful judgment of his peers, or by the Law of the Land." I contend that the clear option as to method of trial is an option that belongs to me as my property, and that title to this property is confirmed by the Confirmation of Liberties given in Magna Carta- "We have granted also, and given to all the Freemen of our Realm, for Us and our Heirs for ever, these Liberties underwritten, to have and to hold to them and their Heirs, of Us and our Heirs for ever" I also contend that the substantive law relevant to this hearing is further declared by the provisions of the Declaration of Rights and further secured by the Bill of Rights subsequently enacted - "That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void" As such, I do not recognise the DVLA’s authority to issue penalties/fines nor have I had a trial within a competent criminal Court to find guilt under a section 31A offence of not procuring a vehicle licence. Should the DVLA insist on pursuing this unlawful course of action, then I request that you refer the matter to the European Court of Justice under article 234
×
×
  • Create New...