ClareMacca77
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
32 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
1 Neutral-
Ahh I never thought of that I will check they've all been removed. Apparently they apologise for this 'oversight pfft I think it's around a 100 but I will definately ask that question when I reply, I'm hoping that as I have folks interested in the house it will move to imminent sale rather soon and before they get started on the charging paperwork so they will then accept a sols letter.
-
Hi just thought I'd post an update. B&S have stated that the 2nd enforcement fee was added wrong have removed it and council are happy everything else is correct.. .im not sure how they can justify the sale fee as they could not have taken things that day but hey ho. Council have agreed due to the house now being up for sale to take the case back from the baliffs and go with charging order. They will not accept a solicitors letter as there is no imminent sale. So they are off my back and if like to thank you all for your help
-
Great ta. Ive also argued that baliff doing my original CGA agreement should have returned the case to the council at that point as it was clear I had no means to clear this debt with any goods and by not returning it they've only done so to keep fees. If he does knock I'm going to tell him to nob off. I know he will argue he can break in but the code of conduct specifically states under no circumstances should an EO break into a property without agreement from the council
-
It's a disgrace. I get that these are people doing a job but to use people fears to make money wrongly is shameful. Also I agreed to have paperwork by B&S Emailed and have had letters from.them in this way so no reason at all that it could not have been sent this way Email sent Thank you very much. Incidentally they've still not knocked back do you think they won't bother or will wait till Monday and if he does do I now say that I've asked that the enforcement be suspended?
-
There's 2 liabilty orders one for last year. 1 issued in July for this year. The CGA was done for last year's liabilty in April and I was paying 200pm the debt was £1100 approx and it was down to £600 Then in July a further liabilty order was issued for £2500 approx and they wanted x2 payments of £1500 approx which I couldn't afford. as no payment was made in August they've made a return visit issuing me with a re.entry notice saying that the two liabilty orders have been lumped together and it didnt matter that the CDA was made on a previous LA as it now applies to both LA's. I disputed this with him saying if that was the case then the CDA is invalid as it doesn't show the correct amount currently owed as is was only completes against the first L.A.....said it didn't matter CDA shows debt 2000.31 minus 871 already paid. Then he added 75 compliance fee & 235 enforcement fee leaving 1439 debt. 're.entry notice states Debt 3119 Then next page is debt 2658 and they've added 75 compliance 276 enforcent and 110 sale stage equalling the 3119 as shown on first page
-
I see Thankyou. I've emailed the head of revenues collections requesting he look into placing a charge as an alternative, and explained the goods are all but worthless. Their own code of conduct says the bailiff must obtain prior permission from the council before removing goods for a CT debt so hopefully he won't be able to obtain this.
-
Thanks. who do I offer this to as this is the scenario I am trying to get. The bailiff wasn't interested when I tried to explain said I am liable for the council tax and it didn't matter. Yes it will more than clear the debt and then some. Although im hoping for a normal sale rather than it going to auction Also tried speaking to council who say its with the bailiffs now speak to them. Round in circles
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.