nothing received as of yesterday from the courts ref set aside

will get a copy in the post to them tomorrow then

i posted everything off to Birmingham county court on Tuesday with proof of postage. just wondered if ia m required to pott a copy to the solicitors

everything completed now and ready to go , thanks for all the work by FTMdave which took care of most of it Just wanted to check where i send this . I noticed the fleecers sent the application to CCBC, defence witness statement sent to Birmingham county court. Am i right in assuming Birmingham , which is where the warrant was sent for execution. ?

. i will put it together later and share for comment , thanks for the work on this ftmd and to everyone else for their comments

to Fruitsalad's point i have read them all again and i agree with the comments, So , to clarify the the application notice , witness statement and defence are all referencing claim number ending 28V which is the claim they failed to respond to in time and for which a warrant has now been issued, this is the claim being for the non compliance to the SAR,. The other claim is mentioned in these documents only in respect to them being confused by the presence of a second claim. This other claim , ending 20W had an acknowledgement of service and directions questionnaire which contained a short defence previously shared

fruit salad, yes there are indeed 2 claims and as i read it gladdies have submitted one defence cpvering both claims as i read it i will put together that cronology and post it up

Arrived home from work late last night to a letter from Gladdies , essentially paperwork submitted to the courts requesting the judgement on the SAR non compliance be set aside and further requesting both claims be struck out, witness statements and defence included in the letters They would like the courts to believe they missed the deadlines as they became confused as i issued two claims against them just a few days apart. They would also seem to want to argue that they don't need to respond to the SAR as they have a data sharing agreement with DVLA and we should know that , ignoring the fact that we requested all data held on file and not just data not just that from DVLA i note that the witness statement of MR chana is headed as being filed for the claimant , should that not have been for the defendant ? copies of the application Ws and defence and draft order from gladdies attached for you perusal current status on MCOL is as follows , although this we know may be subject to change SAR claims judgement issued 5/4/2023 @19:07:27 warrant request 19/04/23 : 15:58:06 warrant issued 20/04/2023 19:09:17 databreach claim Bar put in place for EPS 12/04/23 EPS defence filed 12/04/23 DQ sent to EPS 12/04/23 status defence filed i sent my DQ off a few days ago , deadline was May 2nd , so what are the next steps considering this application from gladdies 3597_001.pdf

re the SAR claim, i received confirmation from HMCTS yesterday that the warrant has been issued to Birmingham county court for execution

copy of directions questionnaire received from fleecers solicitors , interestingly in respect to the question as to suitability for determination without a hearing , the answer was no , reason given as follows :- "The claim is flawed; the Claimant has issued 2 sets of proceedings against the same Defendant within days of each other and which related to claims for distress arising out of allegations/issues under the Data Protection Act. The Claimant has acted unreasonably which is deemed to be an abuse of the Court process."

checking on MCOL yesterday to see if the fleecers had submitted a defence and noticed the status now had defence submitted , same date as issue of DQ. Checked my DQ questionnaire and there was a copy of the defence stapled to the back of the mediation notes which i hadn't spotted as i stopped reading once i reached the mediation notes having seen those previous, no harm done though. Copy attached. It would seem to me that their defence actually supports the very point of our claim, stating they ceased the court action as "i had only stayed 1 minute" (actually it was 29 seconds so they don't even have that correct). At best they are admitting to not applying due diligence before accessing my data , although in reality we know this would have been a vexatious claim hoping like many do that i would just pay up under pressure of their threats In commenting on signage , they have also chosen to ignore the issue of no compliant signage , no signage at entrance visible from direction of travel etc etc , they cant even get the length of stay correct ! will be completing DQ today and posting that off over the weekend , any point to note on DQ completion ? i will be saying no to mediation defence filed.pdf

i have submitted the warrant request through MCOL. for the SAR claim non payment , the fee was £83 which is now added to the warrant value

so in respect to enforcement of the judgement on the SAR claim , is the next step applying through the MCOL for enforcement by way o fapplying for a warrant ?

Agreed FTMD, i always thought they needed to defend (or at least look like they are intending to defend in the hope of scaring us off ) and was surprised when it appeared they were not responding , but as we now know that was probably due to the long weekend and delays in system updates over the weekend i received a number of letters from the HMCTs , including the judgement request rejection , acknowledgement of service (copies attached) and directions questionnaire . The DQ needs to be submitted by May 2nd on the SAR non compliance claim , two weeks have passed since the judgement was issued (copy attached) not had any communication from the fleecers in respect to payment , and still have not supplied anything on that SAR request and so are still in breach of that SAR request 2023-04-11 judgement reject+Gladstones AOS filing.pdf 2023-03-15 Claim Issued+2023-04-05 notice of applied judgement (1).pdf

understood Andy just giving the timing context of what l was able to see that's all , nothing more than that