Another begging letter. Still waiting for the LoC.

Had a lovely letter from Debt Recovery Plus. Informing me that most people settle this matter straight away, how I can pay, how I can pay if I'm having difficulties and what'll happen if I don't pay! They finished with this paragraph: Bless! Still sticking with the plan dx. Does anyone have some background or further info on the quoted 'ruling'?

As is my intention dx.

Update... New contract angle appears to be an error. They've been there a while. 1 begging letter received and a follow-up reminder, usual threats but nothing that's bothering me yet. I've taken pics of the signage, they are impossible to read fully as the base of the signage is approx 2.5m high rising to approx 3m at the top.

Thanks ericsbrother, I'll get on to it. It appears that they had taken on the contract that very morning, so I'm one of their very lucky first victims. Waaaay

Thanks dude, I'll update when/if anything happens.

Thanks dx100uk. So what do i do now? Is there a form letter to send? Appeal? Sit tight, etc, etc?

Aaah! Misunderstanding, it was an MNPR capture not ANPR so no pics 'in and out'. My reference to pics was that they took many of my car in the bay, one from the front, rear and sides etc. See attached pdf: SAR-Redacted BTW Pic 5 only shows a partial VRN - the only pic that shows a portion of someones VRN and a lack of BB visibility. subject-access-request-redacted.pdf

Sorry mate, I don't understand, all pix are of a car that I'm the registered keeper of, that were allegedly parked in a contractual space. I've been led to believe that specifics like times, reg no, etc should be omitted. please correct me if i'm wrong. What do you mean by 'so they don't even say where you got done over?' Honestly, I don't wish to come across as obtuse, but I really don't understand.

For PCN's received through the post [MNPR] please answer the following questions. 1 Date of the infringement 03/11/19 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 06/11/19 3 Date received 9/11/19 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No mention of Schedule 4 – Only ...“Made under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012” 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes - There was only one pic with the NTK so I made a SAR and was provided with pics from both sides, rear and front. 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? UKCPS Ltd 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] XXXXXX Shopping Park – No mention of City/Town For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. - 1st instance, via: UKCPS.zatappeal.com - 2nd instance if unsuccessful to: theIAS.org There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here There was only one pic with the NTK so I made a SAR and was provided with pics from both sides, rear and front. Sorry fellow members, my post above seems cold and demanding, I was editing it to state that I would really like your help but ran out of time, I've given as much info as I can think of, but if you do need more, please ask. NTK front and back redacted.pdf

Seems you could be right MiM ...

Whoops, it's been there a while now, plenty of signs too!

Bleedin' marvelous. Been paying these clowns for just short of two years. I even had a problem today in trying to initiate the claim procedure. Logged on here and what did I find? I've logged everything, including asking for a copy of the notes she took whilst on the phone. I'll keep you posted.

Thanks very much for the letter modifications Wonkey. I too was flagging last night, I'd been on the site and or drafting letters for 13hrs. Are you suggesting that this is the letter to send to RMBC's CEO?

Trust me, I was in a terrible state, bowl at both ends and arms and legs like dead-weights. No girly stuff, this was proper man-flu. Can I? This is the kind of stuff I want to establish, if anyone's got any legislation links alluding to this I'd be very (jaffa-cakey) grateful! You're asking me more questions than I asked you LOL. I thought it was but as Ploddertom pointed out it could be a 'he said - she said' battle. If they had considered my application in Mar '10 as quickly as they did in Jan '11 after I'd kicked up the mother of all stinks, then I wouldn't be in this mess. A complaint will be going to the Local Gov Ombudsman methinks. I'll do that after I get the decision on the back-dated CTB claim. Cheers, I'm gonna need it.