hammyhound
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
1,246 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
PRAC / BW PAPLOC now Claimform - old Paydayuk PDL
hammyhound replied to rippedoff15's topic in Financial Legal Issues
How low can they get using covid 19 to pray on the vulnerable my personal opinion is do nothing see if they pay the fee they know they are going to lose and hope you back down -
Yes when you purchased the house the sellers solicitors would have given an undertaking to transfer with clear title ie no charges it will be them that your solicitor has to chase and if your solicitor has to charge for this work the sellers solicitors will have to pay as they clearly clocked up if you don't get it sorted you need to report them
-
Your solicitor who acted on your behalf in the purchase should be doing this. They should have got an undertaking from the seller's solicitors that all the charges will be removed. Get your solicitor to get their file out of archive and do what they should have done. They need to write to the solicitors asking for the equitable charge to be removed. Why should you be out of pocket when the solicitors should have done the job they were supposed to.
-
Anna1s1 started following hammyhound
-
PRAC / BW PAPLOC now Claimform - old Paydayuk PDL
hammyhound replied to rippedoff15's topic in Financial Legal Issues
I am sure DX will come along but get that defence in by hook or crook find the email and get your defence in ask for a delivery receipt but keep trying money claim in the meantime -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
Thanks DX could not find my original post. I did indeed receive a letter of claim but then requested the documents. Receipt of which are above. They are obviously panicking now as in a couple of months its statute barred. -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
This debt is from April 2014. I had a recent letter from them saying the usual take you to court. The debt is for £580. I requested all the usual documents from them What they sent is a fixed sum loan agreement which looks like it was typed yesterday. A statement of account on their letterhead which they say this is the statement of account from the point of the opening of the account to the sale to their client. Surely a statement of account needs to come from the original creditor not something that is typed up by the present creditor. No default notice - they say dont have one No termination notice - they dont have one There is nothing on my credit report nor anything involving PRAC. There is a closed PDUK account from March 2014. The fixed sum loan account states April 2014. Where do I stand on this one any help appreciated. -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
Thanks DX reassuring as ever. -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
I have again requested the correctly dated loan agreement and default notice and the original creditor's statement of account and not what BW Legal have put on their letterhead. That was over a week ago and its all gone quiet - me thinks a claim form is on its way. Reading up on pre-action protocol BW legal should give me 14 days notice that they intend to initiate court proceedings so I assume I have notice of their intention -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
But I imagine in court they will say but Your Honour we removed all interest and default sums so the only amount required is what the Defendant borrowed so why are arguing about interest/default when that is not an issue. The first amount is a think a payment that was deducted from me despite the fact that the loan needed to be repaid in one fell swoop. -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
Their argument will be well we took the interest and charges off - you are paying what you borrowed. -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
These are the documents I have received. How many companies are involved - MEM Consumer Finance, Payday UK and also Instant Cash Loans. They still insist the loan started on 30th April. docs-35.pdf -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
will do when I get home tomorrow -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
I responded to them with my own response letter in replying to their pre-action protocol letter. I requested Agreement dated 30th April 2014 (their letter states this) (the agreement they have supplied is dated 29th March 2014) and it is indeed reconsistuted I can still smell the toner ink on the paper Default Notice Statement of Account Notice of Assignment Thanks for bringing up my previous posts I could not find it anywhere. My credit file in 2014 states a default but this has now disappeared and the account on my credit file says settled. Surely the default should still be there. Yes indeed it did get deferred as I have the payment debiting my account on 30th April and yet they say the agreement is dated 30th April -
PRAC/BW chasing old PDUK PDL
hammyhound replied to hammyhound's topic in PayDay loans and Short Term loans - General
I received the pre-action protocol letter from BW Legal. I responded asking for all the documents relating to my account including the agreement, statement of account, default notice and letter of assignment. They came back with the agreement which is dated 1 month earlier than what says in their pre-action protocol letter. What is interesting is the agreement is between Mem Consumer Finance, me and Payday UK. Why is there three parties to this transaction. The agreement looks like it is printed at the same time as their response but that is not something a judge would really be interested in. Can I ask again to provide the agreement they state in their letter which is 1 month earlier or will they just say it is a typographical error and the agreement is correct. The statement of account is printed on their letter which they sent me 2 days after my request. The statement of account shows at the beginning the amount in the agreement shown as "deferral" and then a whole host of "defaulter/interest accrued" amounts. There is also a charge of £15 some 2 months after my "correct agreement date". At the end of the statement of account all these figures are credited at the end which brings the statement of account back to the original amount. What I need to know is if they have failed to provide the default notice can they just credit the same and say "we have not charged you for the defaulted amount so we do not need to produce the default notice" The letter of assignment is there. Can I go back to them and again ask for the agreement stated in their letter and also the default notice. This all happened in 2014 by the way. I have always checked my credit file and there is a closed account with Payday saying settled but nowhere is a default notice and PRAC Financial dont appear anywhere. They have given me 7 days to respond.
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
- Create New...