Jump to content

paulwlton

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    3,977
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

paulwlton last won the day on January 22 2007

paulwlton had the most liked content!

Reputation

1,239 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. If you have a parking ticket you could get compensation due to DVLA law breach, expert says WWW.BRIDPORTNEWS.CO.UK The DVLA passed on motorists’ personal details to private parking firms Threatening letters from a DCA chasing up a charge emanating from a data breach does cause distress.?
  2. Changing the lawful basis for processing data is not a good option as per the ICO guidance.
  3. The Guardian GUARDIAN.PRESSREADER.COM The Guardian I believe this is the print version.
  4. Yes ill post a link - I expect there'll be a lot of interest in the story. There are two versions, one for print and a longer online version, both versions were being looked over by lawyers last night. The journalist is hopeful that the story will be out tomorrow.
  5. Im informed that the DVLA/ICO story will appear in the press over the weekend. Should be an interesting read. The DVLA may have got themselves in to a spot of bother.
  6. So the ICO have determined that the DVLA has used the wrong lawful basis for processing under the GDPR. In my own case the DVLA stated they’d provided DR plus with my data because they were either the agent of the landowner or had rights to do so on behalf of the agents of the landowner, but never provided me with proof. Interestingly, the ICO stated that the DVLA do not hold this information, so cannot provide proof and the only way I can find out is if I make a FOI request to the parties involved, although there are exemptions they can use to avoid complying. The DVLA must comply with accountability under the GDPR and have systems in place to make sure they share data to parties that have legal authority to receive it. The above suggests they are making an assumption not relying on fact. Im speaking with a journalist on this now, so any comments on the above is appreciated. Paul
  7. You need all the statements, write back and make it clear that if they refuse you’ll submit a complaint to the ICO.
  8. Hi Peter After reading the opinion I'm not confident in pursuing this.
  9. You really need all the data that the bank holds on you. First time I've heard of their collection centre arranging a loan to refinance.
  10. The legal opinion gives the green light to claim damages under breaches of the DPA 1998 and/or negligence as per Durkin.
  11. Should receive it in the next few days. Looking forward to your comments on the opinion. Regards
  12. Someone that specialises on the subject might be a better way to put it.
  13. Opinion should be with me by Thursday. The expert has been involved in COA cases concerning matters I've raised.
  14. Peter, I agree that Grace is not really required as the data is probably incorrect in any event, contrary to data laws. Nevertheless, I’ve instructed the expert to consider it, so it will be interesting to see if it assists.
×
×
  • Create New...