Jump to content


Parallel MBNA/EC/Varde - CCA enforceable?


tranders
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5082 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Some of you may be following 3 separate MBNA/Experto Credite/Varde threads -here's another to add to the mix. Same story as M&M, HeftHippo and PumpyTums. After EC stated their Client (presumably Varde at the time) refused an F&F from me, I decided to CCA request them. More than 50 days later, I got my 'CCA' (liks to view below).

 

I'd appreciate it if someone can confirm enforceability please?

 

http://i789.photobucket.com/albums/yy175/tranders/cca/cca1.jpg

 

and

 

http://i789.photobucket.com/albums/yy175/tranders/cca/cca2.jpg

 

Many thanks

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing. Bed now, got square eyes :)

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i feel it is unwise after the recent court cases to go down the line of hiding behind a possible unenforceable cca.

if you HAVE had the money, esp more so.

 

it is much better to hit the oc's with reclaims for unlawful charges+int & p'haps mis-sold PPI? first.

 

that might stop them wriggling?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i feel it is unwise after the recent court cases to go down the line of hiding behind a possible unenforceable cca.

if you HAVE had the money, esp more so.

 

it is much better to hit the oc's with reclaims for unlawful charges+int & p'haps mis-sold PPI? first.

 

that might stop them wriggling?

 

dx

 

No intention of hiding, dx. Just want to know - every little bit helps. I'm open to all ways of ensuring that I treat fairly (bear in mind I went down the route of negotiating and was rejected - on the phone - no written rejection, reason given, the EC account manager stated they never put rejections in writing).

 

I have a payment agreement in place with EC which I intend to continue honouring unless there are grounds not to. At this point in time I don't know whether I have grounds.

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a stack of monthly statements (copies, of course) today and an interesting nugget came out of it.

 

I had been perplexed by the fact that my account number appeared to have changed. Reading through the statements, it became clear that when the OC sold the debt off, the OC opened a new account through which the sums involved were siphoned off.

 

so:

Acc. XXXXXXXXXXXX - balance £X - the original

 

then suddenly the statement changed to:

Acc. YYYYYYYYYYYY - balance £X, with a transfer from acc XXXXXXXXXX then through some jiggery pokery becomes balance £0 with a buy back of £X.

 

From that point on, the statements all show acc YYYYYYYYYYYYYY

 

EC all quote the new Acc number YYYYYYYYYYY - which, oddly enough, shows a balance or 0, or in fact credit.

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tranders,

 

Are the statements due to a SAR you've sent?

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol. Got my CCA today too (from EC). Is yours a quarter of both sides of a page?

 

 

EDIT - just seen it above - same as mine. Will post mine up tomorrow, one of us will get an answer ;)

 

M

Edited by MandM
typo

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might aswell make it one big claim - they could save a packet and do us all together :D

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I too have received communication from Experto quoting a different Account Number than the original MBNA account.

 

Have now received a letter saying that due to a techincal error on their systems they have been corresonding with an internal account reference number that I might not recognise.

 

Then go to to say "Our legal advisors have directed us to communicate with you using the correct account number allocated to you as it relates to the original credit agreement"

 

 

The agreement number on the letter is now the original MBNA account number.

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I sent SAR to MBNA my acc had changed number after it had been sold off. My belief is that by changing account number they than then keep your details on for another 6 years! I contacted the ICO over it, as MBNA had sold my account 10yrs ago but still had all my details on file, the account number had changed after 5 1/2yrs and looked like it had only just been sold on. The ICO came back and said thay were entitled to keep the data for as long as they (MBNA) felt was necessary as long as they were not treating my data differently to others!!!!

 

When I queried the example in the ICO letter of industry standards being keeping data for 6yrs after last use of account, I was told that is not set in stone and in effect it can be kept indefinately.

 

Hence my thoughts as to why they change the account numbers.

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone tell me whether a valid credit agreement must be signed by both myself and the OC to be a valid and enforceable document?

yes

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,Cerbs - as I mmentioned in a previous post, I've got no bones about apying, but I'm not happy with the shenanigans of both MBNA and Experto Credite in the way this has been handled. This at least gives me the opportunity to keep haranguing them whislt still keeping them dangling.

 

So now I send a "serious dispute" letter and continue paying my monthly payment as a gesture of goodwill.

 

Waiting for my MBNA SAR so I can investigate further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR info usually bites them due to the sold date problem

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well - finally received my SAR from MBNA (7 days shy of date due) and am disappointed that they haven't complied with my full request.

 

Missing:

 

  • Notice of Default
  • CCA (got same sheet as one EC sent which is an application form)
  • Notice of Assignment

I did get Transaction logs, Custome Info System logs and some screenshots that seem totally useless to me.

 

The transaction logs are interesting. I haven't photocopied a couple of pages and put them on photobucket. I won't put the links here since even with sensitive info blanked, I reckon a seasoned DCA or MBNA mole can identify me if they want to go to the trouble of doing so. There are some people on here that I would trust and I would appreciate a PM from if interested in seeing them - could use your advise.

 

What I will say is that it shows that they issued (and posted) the NoD on the 7th, and it states in the log that the expiry date is the 24th. I make that 4 days posting (2nd class) + 13 calendar days - 1 short of the 14 I'm supposed to get (BTW - is that 14 working or calendar days? I assume it's calendar).

 

What's really interesting is that on the 18th, it shows they sold the account to DCA1, bought it back on the 22nd, then sold it to EC (not Varde as EC stated in their letter informing me of sale) on the 28th.

 

Is this recission of contract? Doesn't state absolute or equitable - just SOLD in both cases.

 

Haven't got my Varde letter to hand so can't check what date EC send their assignment letter at the moment.

 

Anyone have any thoughts or advice?

 

T

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HeftyHippo

in the same boat.

 

i'm not sure whether to proceed as if the debt was SOLD like 2 letters say it was, or see if a full answer can be obtained.

 

if there's stuff missing from your SAR. write back and tell them its not complete. give them a couple of examples so they can't just say it all there. and tell them to send you everything, and not just for the last 6 years, or to explian why they haven't send it. the DN is a example. If they didn't send it why not, same with the agreement, get them to either send it or say they dont have it. black or white. remind them the clock is still ticking, and the 40 days is for them to send everything, not the first bit.

 

they treat us like fools, going through the motions expecting us not to notice

 

they didn't send me anything for 2 accounts I held!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

So - has anyone else received a missive from EC asking you to call them with regard to their fantastic one off offer which ends this week?

 

Since I haven't actually received any such offer, I think I'll resist the temptation to call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 2 accounts ''sold off'' to EC/Varde, but havent heard a thing for at least a couple of months. The DNs were faulty, but I dont know if I should send the letter accepting illegal rescission because I'm still not sure if the sale was equitable or absolute. If I write and ask Varde, are they obliged to tell me?

 

BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

My DN was short by one day, but SAR confirmed that sale made prior to remedy date and EC letter confirmed it too.

 

Once I had this proof, I sent Unlawful rescission letter to MBNA and confirmed to EC that I had accepted UR.

 

Not sure whether it matters if sale was equitable or absolute so can't help with that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My DN was short by one day, but SAR confirmed that sale made prior to remedy date and EC letter confirmed it too.

 

Once I had this proof, I sent Unlawful rescission letter to MBNA and confirmed to EC that I had accepted UR.

 

Not sure whether it matters if sale was equitable or absolute so can't help with that.

 

 

Thanks Dotty, I thought the sale had to be absolute before you could accept the rescission, but I may be totally wrong on that.

 

BF

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...