Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Complaints about the FOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As promised in the 'Complaining to the FOS' thread, I'm starting a new one for complaining about the FOS. Though I'm happy to co-ordinate a joint complaint, I can't do it without input from the rest of the forum.

 

The general complaints that I've seen mentioned are

 

1. How long it takes

2. No obligation to follow the law

3. Bias towards the Banks/DCAs

4. Decisions which are patently unfair to the consumer, e.g. automatically paying compensation awarded to the Bank/DCA to reduce a debt without any proof that the debt is owed or proof of any right to collect

 

I'm sure we can add to that list as we go along.

 

The present suggestion is that we submit a joint complaint to Watchdog. I'm not sure what it will achieve, if anything, but we can only try. It might be worth submitting a copy of any complaint to our own MPs too, though I know for a fact that my MP is a complete waste of time. Again any other suggestions of who to complain to would be welcome.

 

For now I would suggest that if you want to be included in a joint complaint you post a (brief) summary of the nature of your complaints.

 

I'll start drafting something to be sent to Watchdog and/or whoever else we come up with, then post for amendments and suggestions.

  • Haha 1

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 441
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When companies have been given 40 days to deal with an official complaint, why does the FOS give them additional 8 weeks to respond, when it have been given documentary evidence that you have followed the legal requirements? That is after a significant delay in being able to deal with a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm subbing - go for it RMW!!:D

I'm waiting to hear from the Adjudicator re. a huge dispute, but don't hold out much hope. From what I've experienced so far they just seem biased and make value judgements on behalf of the banks.

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the fos has been reviewed by the courts and academic writers I'm not sure that this will go anywhere.

 

They give plenty of time on the basis of the 'enough rope to hang themselves' and because they need to follow the rules of natural justice, especially as the decisions are binding. just like set asides of ccjs if they went quicker then they'd be subject to alot of set aside 'hearings'.

 

As for the obligation to follow the law, often this is open to interpretation and it is not the role of adr to follow the law specifically, if you want this you go to the courts, not fos. You go to fos if you want an alternative approach to your dispute that may nod towards the law. In places this is of benefit, for eg where laws of evidence etc are concerned. You'd be amazed how many consumers label everything without prejudice...

 

can't comment on the last two, but I'd wager that the banks also feel that they are bias, hence the judicial reviews etc. I used to have alot to do with ADR (in another field) and I was always struck how both sides were adamant that the adjudicator was bias. Go figure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The present suggestion is that we submit a joint complaint to Watchdog. I'm not sure what it will achieve, if anything, but we can only try.

 

It was only a suggestion:(. I just thought that perhaps some public humiliation might help kick start them or the FSA/government into making some changes - it sometimes works.

 

It might also help highten public awareness of the concept of requesting CCA's etc. I know that before I found this forum I just assumed I had to either keep paying or declare myself bankrupt and hand over everything I own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heard sfa from them! Totally ignored

 

Also had one dca asking my ex what my details were when I asked him to deal with it (as he should ref our divorce). They asked him what my income was, what assests I had and told him I had already agreed to pay £5 a month when all I did was ask for the paperwork as I didn't recognise it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had 3 complaints returned from the FOS the 4th is still being investigated.

 

HSBC - Credit card. Apparently a blank template form is sufficient. They accepted HSBC's word that they had halted collection activity which was totally untrue.

 

Barclay Card - both Visa and Mastercard: Documents provided are application mailer forms with no prescribed terms on either document. FOS ignored the part of the complaint where telephone calls were almost hourly both silent and human. They also ignored the aggressive tactics used by Mercers, B/Cs inhouse agents. Their reply advised that it "would be unreasonable for the FOS to cease its debt recovery action in respect of the accounts and that they will not make a finding on the enforceability of the credit agreement.

 

Halifax - FOS response "From the information you have provided, you are not complaining about a financial loss. Therefore the FOS cannot help you" ??

 

On the all of the above, a final paragraph was added in that only a court could advise the enforceablity of the documents.

 

HSBC, personal loan and PPI mis selling on 3 separate occasions. Complaint first made in May. Beginning of November, I was advised the complaint had been allocated to an adjudicator. End of NOvember, I was advised as the complaint was complex, it was being passed on to a specialist department. Nothing heard since.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the fos has been reviewed by the courts and academic writers I'm not sure that this will go anywhere.

 

They give plenty of time on the basis of the 'enough rope to hang themselves' and because they need to follow the rules of natural justice, especially as the decisions are binding. just like set asides of ccjs if they went quicker then they'd be subject to alot of set aside 'hearings'.

 

I've actually found that once your case does get allocated, the adjudicator does get pretty stroppy with the Bank/DCA if they don't respond fairly promptly plus they do also give the consumer a bit of leeway.

 

As for the obligation to follow the law, often this is open to interpretation and it is not the role of adr to follow the law specifically, if you want this you go to the courts, not fos. You go to fos if you want an alternative approach to your dispute that may nod towards the law. In places this is of benefit, for eg where laws of evidence etc are concerned. You'd be amazed how many consumers label everything without prejudice...

 

Totally agree on the evidence point, however there are numerous complaints that I've read where the FOS have actually done the opposite to what the law states, e.g. paying damages awarded to the consumer to someone else (not even the bank being complained about) without any agreement from the consumer that they should do so.

 

can't comment on the last two, but I'd wager that the banks also feel that they are bias, hence the judicial reviews etc. I used to have alot to do with ADR (in another field) and I was always struck how both sides were adamant that the adjudicator was bias. Go figure.

 

To at least some extent I think the FOS are right in refusing to adjudicate on e.g. whether an agreement is enforceable as that is something that should quite rightly be decided by a court. However there is case law that they do have to follow the Banking Code (see the cases library) and I would argue that they should also therefore follow the OFT guidelines on debt collection. They don't, or don't always. Actually I think the biggest problem with the FOS is inconsistency. If we don't know whether or not they are going to follow the law or a particular set of guidelines, how do we know if it's worth the effort of complaining? Just imagine if the courts were not obliged to all use the same rules .....

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone correct me if I am wrong, ( I dont think so)

The FOS is a body that is within the remit of the new FOI (Freedom of information). So, providing you are specific in your request, such as, lets say a DCA you're getting grief off. You can request pertinent questions as to what investigations the FOS have made into that particular DCA and why.

Now the trick is to try and make sure it wont cost the FOS more than £450 to give you the info.

This may well help someone who is going to court and would like to point out to the honourable judge of previous misdemeanors by that DCA ( or bank etc.)

I've used the American version personally and the chief judge here threw out the case.

So, maybe a little thought.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

NatWest - No CCA agreement at all re loan 6 yrs ago, defaulted on CCA and SAR requests, making demands and threats for payments despite defaults & grievances raised, Breach of OFT guidelines, CPUTR 2008 and Banking Code S13, incorrectly serving default notices under cca despite there being no agreement, unlawfully moving sums from current account without consent (despite there being no cca agreement thus no right of set-off), setting up standing order without consent.

FOS response = banks actions reasonable despite no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

NatWest - No CCA agreement at all re loan 6 yrs ago, defaulted on CCA and Subject Access Request requests, making demands and threats for payments despite defaults & grievances raised, Breach of OFT guidelines, CPUTR 2008 and Banking Code S13, incorrectly serving default notices under cca despite there being no agreement, unlawfully moving sums from current account without consent (despite there being no cca agreement thus no right of set-off), setting up standing order without consent.

FOS response = banks actions reasonable despite no agreement

That's shocking, tem.:mad:

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Someone correct me if I am wrong, ( I dont think so)

The FOS is a body that is within the remit of the new FOI (Freedom of information).

 

Ok I will. You are wrong,

 

The Freedom of Information Act does not apply to the Financial Ombudsman Service. The Freedom of Information Act ONLY applies to public authorities.

 

The Financial Ombudsman Service is not a public authority.

The Financial Ombudsman Service is not a government department

The Financial Ombudsman Service is not a government agency.

 

The Financial Ombudsman Service is in fact is in fact a limited company....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in on this! FOS is rubbish! Rang them about barclaycard who haven't bothered to deal with complaints at all and they just give them another couple of months to do so!! Agreed that we're entitled to see a CCA but don't seem keen on enforcing our right to be sent one, complete bias towards banks, in fact everyone you complain to can't be arsed to stop the behaviour. No-one I've spoken to about the harassment calls is interested, lots of sympathy but no actual action.

Luckily it doesn't put me off, I like a battle, won my charges back off Halifax with just 2 letters!! I can do this in the end with or without the FOS.

 

Watchdog-I actually think it would be a good idea, maybe not the FOS but about how DCAs behave, it's right up their street and they've been looking at some of them recently anyway.

 

Jo

Link to post
Share on other sites

The adjudicators have no training whatsoever in consumer credit disputes. They are alright if a direct debit has gone missing or your granny didn't get her interest on her savings but if a bank breaks all the consumer credit laws, they are completely out of their depth. Totally useless. They make assumptions which have no basis in fact whatsoever. I have a case with them at the moment, now into it's second year, which, after strong legal argument and the benefits of my experience as a senior manager (in arguing about communication within a bank) has finally gone to an Ombudsman. The adjudicator was going to close the case after my initial complaint. What of people who haven't had my experience? I don't hold out much hope for any change in decision. It went to the Ombudsman 2 months ago and I haven't heard a peep since. It's been with them so long it has grown a beard and the bank I am complaining about disappeared from the horizon last March - Ha! Two things - they take months to give you any reply yet want you to reply in 7 days and I undestand the banks get to see what you are saying and are given a chance to respond to it but you never get to see what THEY are saying. Totally biased in favour of the banks and they ignore the law completely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And have a look who the board members are; our board

 

One wonders when the lessons identified from the FSA fiasco will be applied?

 

The other problem is that many of FOS's employees are from the financial sector - presumably the ones who couldn't get aboard the bonus bus - who seem to view cases from a banker's viewpoint.

 

By coincidence my employer has a similar board of non-executive directors; it's a nightmare. They may be some of the great and the good, but they have no real experience of what we do, though some once worked in the general area. If we go to them with problems, they are invariably reassured by senior management, even if what they're told is utter bolleaux, and I suspect that the same might be applied here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We're still waiting to hear from the FOS adjudicator about our complaint about the TSB. It took the best part of a week to write the complaint, enclosing all the documents we could think of, then months waiting for the complaint to be 'assigned', now we're in limbo, waiting for months again. This stuff wears you down. Worst of all, it puts you off making further complaints, as you have the feeling that they're being posted into a black hole! :rolleyes:

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now we're all assuming that FOS was set up to assist the consumer. As we can see, that's just not right. It was actually set up to assist the ever growing credit sector "justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done". They can't comment on enforceability, only a Court can do that. Only the OFT can enforce the terms on a CC licence, and we all know how ineffectual that body is.

No. The FSO is there purely ans simply to ensure that the credit industry is not given a bad name by complaints from the general public

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vince Cable, Lib Dem for Twickenham, appears to have a pretty good idea of what is going on with the Banks and Credit Card Companies at the moment. He has been fighting the corner of the consumer for quite a while.

 

I wonder if it would be worthwhile flooding his Parliamentary inbox with all our complaints about the Financial Ombudsman :D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vince Cable, Lib Dem for Twickenham, appears to have a pretty good idea of what is going on with the Banks and Credit Card Companies at the moment. He has been fighting the corner of the consumer for quite a while.

 

I wonder if it would be worthwhile flooding his Parliamentary inbox with all our complaints about the Financial Ombudsman :D

 

Petition to: Abolish the Financial Services Ombudsman. | Number10.gov.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of people have mentioned that the decision of FOS is binding - it isn't. It is binding on the Bank/Company but not binding on the complainant i.e if you dont like the outcome you can still go down the legal route.. I have pursued a number of cases via the FOS (and as other people mention the result has generally been unsatisfactory as they dont see the absence of enforceable agreements as an issue) however in a couple of cases the result has gone in my favour and saved the cost and effort of proceeding to court. Where time is not an issue for you, it is often worth a crack at the FOS route, not least because some firms will hold off on collection activity whilst a case is with FOS. Bearing in mind that they are currently several months behind with their workload it is a useful option where things are within a few months of being statute barred

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...