Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is important that you do the reading about this subject in the sub- forum. It's not complicated but you need to be in control and I don't think you are. For instance, much of the information you need and also the case transcripts that you're looking for are in the fixed topics at the top of this sub- forum but clearly you didn't know that. You will gain in confidence if you do the reading. Particularly as it now looks as if the mediation has not worked because EVRi have stayed you up and so you may now be going to trial. You need to understand thoroughly what you are doing. We will help you and you will find our support is unstinting but you have to do your part. Please spend a lot of time reading the stories on the sub- forum especially the pinned posts at the top of the sub- forum and then start preparing your court bundle. We have instructions here for everything
    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Me Vs Lowell Financial / ***WON WITH COSTS***


Shawn0109
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5521 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody, hopee you are all well, it's been a while since I have been on here but here it goes.

 

A few months ago recieved a stat demand from the nice people from Lowell Financial about an old Capital One Credit Card that is now stat barred because it is now just over 6 years old. The stat demand was sent out by 2nd class post as always and it just said all the crap under the sun and that I should get it set aside at my local court ok I thought these people should know where my local court is and all so took it in and filled in the forms of why the debt is in dispute with interest charges, late payment fees the expensive anual fee they keep adding and all the good stuff, also that they ignored my request for a cca 3 times. Anyways my hearing is on the 27th January @12:00pm but here is where it now gets interesting have finally had a response to my cca after all this time last week so I took it to the court to add to my file so if the hearing continues the judge will know about it being there. This is what they wrote.

 

Dear sir

 

We refer to your recent request for a copy of the original credit aggreement for this account.

 

After liaising with capital one in a effort to obtain this document we have been advised that it is no longer available due to the length of time since the account was opened with you.

 

At this time we have clossed our file and will not make any further contact with you concerning payment against this account unless the copy of the aggreement is recieved at some point in the future from capital one.

 

And it just goes on from there to phone them if I have any questions but I aint going to these people aint worth the bother, so what do you think the outcome will be on this now? Do you think I have a good chance of getting this set aside now? Should I ask the Judge for it to be struck out? And what about my time work and effort in trying to get all the evidence I needed that this debt in unenforcable should I apply for costs also due to the ammount of stress I'm under from them?

 

Thanks all any advice would be good, oh also anybody wanna come to the hearing and see the outcome?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Get your costs in as LITIGANT IN PERSON to the court 24 hours before the hearing.....!!

 

Head the piece of paper LITIGANT IN PERSON costs

 

As an example - 10 hours of research into Consumer Credit Act 1974 @9.25 per hour

10 hours research into the Insolvency Act @ £9.25 per hour

Parking

Postage

40p per mile mileage allowance....!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 42man thats a big help and gets my mind off worrying my head off about it all, I might be wrong but Lowell might not even turn up and even if they do I'm not gonna let it worry me, I'm just gonna try and sort my head out but I think I've done all I can for now in respect of the evidence I've got, when I took it to the court the other day the woman at the desk said oh we dont need that just bring it with you on the day so I just said well can you photocopy the evidence I've got and just add it to the file so the judge knows it's there, so in the end she did it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember to dress smartly, be polite to the judge call them sir/madam, ask the judge if you are allowed a McKenzie Friend (somebody who can accompany you but can't actually talk unless specific permission is granted)........I would suggest that you show the judge how disgusted you are at having to go through this especially as the alleged debt is totally disputed. Keep good eye contact with the judge and don't interrupt while he/she is speaking.....do NOT be afraid to ask for your costs for the research that you have done, by all means tell the judge you have done a lot of research into the high court case law.

 

On the off chance you get a really, poor judge then do make your points....if for any reason he doubts what you have said, just name the specific case law, If you want to disagree with a point that he/she makes then say, "With the greatest of respect sir they....etc etc". If it isn't going well, and as a last resort, then ask for an adjournment so you can make a Subject Access Request to the alleged original creditor and ask the judge to reserve costs"

 

Just remember to be polite, be firm, and make your point. And refer to all the case law that is on your affadavit if need be. And ask for your costs !!! the Judge can only say no at worst....

 

I'm sure you'll be fine !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT didnt think of calling them or writing to them because they can do something about people like this I might sound stupid now though who is the FOS?

But like I say there is no credit aggrement so from what people have told me it is unenforceable and I have my credit report also as evidence if I need it but doubt that I will, I'm just not looking forward to this feeling sick every time I think about the damn thing, 42man thank you for your advice so far it is very much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK just an update on the situation I phoned the county court today just to ask if the other side aka RED/LOWELL have sent any documents into them to support their claim, the lady told me that all they have had is the evidence that I sent in the other week and nothing more, I'm now trying to work out what costs I should go for all that matters to me is getting this evil off my back as for my credit report do you think I can get them to take the information Lowell Financial has put on there off? When I called them they said it's possible but the joke is that she said there is another one from Lowell Financial for a joint loan account erm really I'm not married at the moment so I think they are trying to screw with me here so gonna also put a complaint to the OFT today and I'm sorry I might sound dumb here but who or what is the FOS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok my sister in law had a talk with me the other day she is a solicitor, she has put my mind at ease quite a bit, she told me that in their letter they sent me about not being able to obtain a copy of the CCA I asked for they are now in default and that the debt is now unenforcable, she told me that I should now send out a letter to them stating that I want then to remove all information they have on me from the CRA so I have writen a letter to them asking to do this again I have not signed it in anyway because I know that these people from what I understand are very clever at lifting your signature on a computer and pasting it on to a credit aggreement.

So I will just wait and see what they will do next, I have also called the OFT yesterday and out a complaint in about Lowell/Red or whoever the hell they call themselves and have also contacted the FOS so both are investingating them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh also one last point my sister in law found it very laughable that they sent out a stat demand when they have no form of proof or credit aggreement as far as she was concerned it is a very cheap very bad threat of making me or forcing me to pay, I am still worried about the upcomming hearing and I dont know what the judge will make of this situation but hopefully he/she will be on my side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I'm getting a little worried again now about this situation stomach os all in knotts, I have drawn up a list of costs that I'm going to send into the court on Monday before the hearing, do I or should I send in any more evidence to them before the hearing or have I done enough, like I say I have already given them the original lettes from Lowell/Red and have kept the photocopies for myself but besides from filling in the forms for the set aside hearing is there anything else I should be doing I swore my affidavit when I went to court and all so they have all the information but like I say do I need to do anything else I'm really getting stressed again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just take all the relevant paperwork with you....!! there isn't anything else you need to do at this stage. It seems a clearcut case. And you should also mention to the judge that this would seem to be an unfair practice, under the OFT's guidelines on debt collection. (take a copy of those too - http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I have 3 days to get myself in order here, tuesday at 12pm is my hearing for all this crap I have really had enough of Lowells also known as Red for putting me through all this stress, I need to know what I will need on the day of the hearing so I can quote it if I need it, the evidence the court have got from me is the letter I recieved from Lowells dated in Novemeber saying that they have no CCA so the debt is unenforcable, but I need to know what I will need to take with me on the day example research and things I can either show the judge or quote from if things go wrong. Help me please anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Sam614 I somehow doubt that they will even turn up to this thing and all the stress and worry they have caused me, if and it's a big if they dont turn up I'm hoping this will be struck out never mind it being set aside I want what ever is on my credit file that has been put on there by these people taken off by them because as far as I'm concerned there is no CCA Agreement they havent got one neither has the original creditor so it is unenforcable they havent made any contact with me after the final letter they sent stating they had no agreement and neither does the original creditor and well thats all I ever heared from them and that was back in November. If anybody else has any advice to offer me then I would welcome it openly. Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

almost defo no show by losers.

i made myself really ill,stress wise through these parasites i believed all the vile threats.as we all do before finding cag.

try to relax,think pos,soon be out of your hair.

 

sam614

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well phoned the court up on friday to ask if the other side have sent anything over to them yet so far, no they havent, I'm a bit more relaxed about the situation, but nervous as hell going to the hearing on tuesday, can anyone tell me what to expect when I go there is it just a room or what? And can anyone give me advise on what else I would need to take with me besides the evidence I have already submitted to the court, as I am not too sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shawn, the hearing will likely take place in the Judges office. He/she will understand that you are a Litigiant In Person (layman) and make due allowance for it.

 

Plan to be there at least an hour before your hearing, in case of any last minute changes. When you get to court ask at the reception which judge is dealing with your case and where his office is. Within the vacinity of his office (possibly a waiting room)there is likely to be a clerk controlling the hearings. Just let them know you've arrived. You'll be called into the judges office along with the opposition, should they turn up, both parties will then put their case to the judge and he will make his decision. If the other side don't turn the judge will likely ask you a few questions and give you judgement by default as the other side didn't show.

 

I think you've covered everything from the paperwork angle.

 

Good luck for Tuesday, and let us all know how you got on.

A couple of hundred years ago Meyer Amshel, (1743-1812), founder of the Rothschild dynasty is reported to have told his five sons, “Let me control a nation’s money and I care not who writes its laws”.

 

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what I have written is my own opinion garnered from reading this forum and consumer legislation, and my own experience of the judicial process.

 

If I have been helpful, please feel free to tickle my scales!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...