Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dilemma concerning CA


Jimmystix
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone I have come to a crossroads concerning my CA with CAp1.

Over a year ago I went down the CCA route but at the same time also did the SAR. I never received a reply about the CCA but did eventually get one through the SAR.

Apart from statements etc I got the first applaication form

 

 

A few weeks after I got a letter stating they had forgotten an important document which was the application form again. Might I add I was still paying the monthly payments as I could afford it.

capapp.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing much happened after that. I told Cap1 that the application form is a pre agreement and unless the reverse of the application form could be found then it is unenforcable. I also stated even if they could find the reverse it is still a pre agreement.

I was still making payments and again nothing. So then I decided to stop making payments to see if things would move on and they did. Surprisingly,:roll:.

 

They need time to look intot he account , A harrassment letter was also sent to stop the phones calls.

Then I received this lot

CAP! REPSPONSE.jpg

CAPREsPONSE2.jpg

CAPRESPONSE3.jpg

FAKECA.jpg

FAKECA1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last 3.

Sorry if I posted stuff wrong I don't usually do pictures.

Anyhow the supposed CA looked legit and I thought oh well time to carry on paying. Although I did wonder if the 5 pages were really on the back of the application form and why was it already personalised with the name and address. Most application forms through the post have jsut the name and adress on the first page.

When going through it I noticed the late payment charges on the last page £15.

I thought I will look through my statements, I received through the SAR because I have from time to time paid late. It was then I noticed several, around 6, late payment charges of £20.

So my dilemma is this.

Does the different charges from what is quoted on the FAKE CA make a difference.

Do I tell Cap1 about their mistake or will it make them create another one.

I had offerd a goodwill gesture of around 60% of the account. I came to that figure due to what I had paid since asking for my CA, the payment protection I had paid and what I owed. Do I now withdraw this as I had made the offer in the hope things could be settled quickly. However now I am annoyed because I almost fell for this supposed CA and without checking the SAR statements would now be paying again.

The only signature they have is on that application form, can an application form be enforced?

Thanks in advance to anyone who offers any type of advice or support and again sorry if I have messed up the forum with my scans.

FAKECA2.jpg

FAKECA3.jpg

FAKECA4.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Application form th_cca7.jpg The letter I received off Cap1 which was expected especially the reconstituted bit, although I will not be taking them to court so it's just a diverter. th_CAPREPSPONSE.jpg th_CAPREsPONSE2.jpg th_CAPRESPONSE3.jpg Then the supposed CA, whether it is off the back of application form or not the late payment charges do not match with my SAR statements. th_FAKECA.jpg th_FAKECA1.jpg th_FAKECA2.jpg th_FAKECA3.jpg th_FAKECA4.jpg As I previously mentioned I am not sure which road to go down. I am not that bothered about telling Cap 1 about the late payment fee being wrong as I firmly belive they have just made the CA up and would have no problem making another one up. I think I will ask for a copy of the reverse of the application form in it's original format, as the only signature they have is on that application form so any terms have to be with that document. I hit preview and it looks terrible but hopefully legible so I shall leave it. Again thanks in advance to anyone, you may be able to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imo the originals(application) unenforceable. No key terms.

The agreement is reconstituted, its the top scan thats the 1 that matters.

Well I think you know the answer if they are sending out wonky reconstructions for cca requests.

Dont think they will be going near court with that cack.

ps have you reclaimed the ppi and charges?, might be a less messy way. You can add contractual interest which really bumps things up.

 

You may be better posting on the dca forum for these sort of threads though. You'll get some nice templates and better educated answers but for now rest easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Almost a year and on my third DCA.

Fredrickons came and went

Capquest came and went

Now CSL they are sending someone nest week although I shall show them back down the path, while sending the doorstep visit letter.

A question am I being unreasonable.

After checking the SAR, the amount owed was £4700. I saw that PPI was included even though I already had a third party PPI that covered all my cards. Initially I wanted my PPI back.

I made around 8 payments of £150. I stopped because basically I was getting nowhere, it was then CapOne wanted to play.

The PPI payments aswell as the £25 late payment fees came to around £1200.

I offerd a FFS of 60 monthly payments at £50 and it was refused.

The account ended up at around £6500 with the charges and added interest.

I would still gladly pay the 60 payments but now it looks poor offer as the amount increased.

Anyhow what answers you may say. I must add that anyone that has had the ' we are paying you a visit' do not worry.

If you do end up in court and have to pay, the court will only make you pay what you can afford.

 

Was my offer unreasonable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...