Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Esa Appeal Today.


cbbc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5085 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have my appeal today.

I sent in all of my specialist letters and a detailed report of where the ATOS doctor went wrong ( i used Honeybees template) two weeks ago.

I rang tribunal service yesterday with a question only to find that even though my info was signed for, they have no idea where it is and have not sent it to the place I am going to have my hearing. This info is usually looked at by the tribunal 2 weeks before the hearing date but I am to have my hearing without them looking at my evidence, even if I take it today it is not going to be examined as closely as it would have if they had received it 2 weeks ago.

I am devastated. It is bad enough having to face these people without this happening.

I will get there early with copies but I know it will not be the same, everything will be rushed and I will never know if they were read or not.

Please make sure that you check with the tribunal every step of the way.

I had checked with the Royal mail tracker service to make sure my letter had arrived but it still was not enough to make sure it went to the right people, they have no idea where this very personal private information is.

I will let everyone know what happened later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cbbc, I've been wondering when you were on parade, and thanks for the advert. The cheque's in the post :).

 

Seriously though, don't let it get to you. I think the tribunal will be rather unhappy about this and may well make extra allowances for you. You sound as if you know your papers backwards and as you have copies, you can show them anything that they need to see. Don't part with it though!

 

I shall be like a mother hen today waiting to hear how it went, so please tell us when you feel able to.

 

I have everything crossed for you. Big hugs.

 

HB xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Honeybee,

I just rang the clerk and she said if I come in a bit early she will photo copy them and they should have time to read them properly.

I'll let you know soon.:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I KNOW ITS A BIT LATE...as you'll be there by now?

 

but GOOD LUCK!! Hope it's all going well for you there?

 

My fingers and toes are crossed for you and that Hopefully 'JUSTICE IS BEING DONE!!

 

REGARDS

 

COUNTMEIN X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi every one.

Thanks for all your good wishes, they worked because my appeal was allowed.

I got there early and the panel looked at my papers before I was asked in.

There were just two ladies, a tribunal judge and a doctor.

It was explained that only evidence up until my medical in September could be taken into consideration.

I was questioned thoroughly about the ESA50 that I had filled in in August.

I had not realised that the ESA50 would be as important as it was.

I was very nervous but it was not as bad a I thought it would be.

I went in on my own and the ladies were very nice.

I already had 6 points and was given another 9.

I hope every one going through this is as lucky.

Thanks again for the support, advise and good people on this site

I hope I can now help people going through this too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cbbc, I can't tell you how pleased I am and relieved for you! I expect you're knackered now, go and chill out. I remember how I felt after the event. Honestly though, it's nearly as exciting as when I won my own appeal, I'm so happy.

 

And thanks for letting us know. And please stay around and give others the benefit of your experience. I hope you live in peace from now on.

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fabulous news cbbc!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read your thread cbbc and would also like to say WELL DONE

and CONGRATS on your appeal.

 

One Concearn ie thread number 6

 

''It was explained that only evidence up until my medical in September could be taken into consideration''

 

Are you saying that any other additional evidence or information after the medical date is not taken into account? ie ATOS medical report?

 

2 -Lots of people's original ESA50 forms are not copied for themselves and so have no idea what was originaly quoted on the form.

As it takes so long for the appeal to be heard how are you supposed to remember what was on the original form?

 

Does this mean that no other evidence is taken into account, ie medical certificates, doctors reports and hospital letters.?

 

My condition has deteriated since I had the medical, how are they supposed to know this, if they do not take anything else into consideration?

 

I originally did not receive any points, but as explained above i have deteriated, how are they supposed to know this if all they look at is the medical report which state -

I received a ESA65 quoting 'how we arrinved at the decision''

1 - questionaire I filled in recently.

2 - the report of the medical assessment I went on

 

I have a copy of my medical report, and the prognosis states ''functional problems-''I advise that a return to work COULD be considered within 3 months'',this was in February.

 

I am due for an operation in June. fingers crossed.

 

If they only look at the medical report what is the point of appealing, if no points were originally given how is this supposed to change?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. I don't think it's like that, but you might have a quick read of the DWP/directgov website on the appeals process.

 

Have you had the appeals pack from the DWP? If the forms you want aren't in there, I'm sure they must have some sort of duty to provide you with them.

 

Don't give up on appealing. The system is there to be used.

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appealed decison on 17 FEB

 

SIGNED FOR ON 18 FEB PROOF

 

MIR SCAN , REFERAL LETTER FROM DOCTOR

 

5 PAGE LETTER

 

ADDITINAL LETTER 1 PAGE 2 SIDED

 

CERTIFICATE MEDICAL ALL IN LETTER

MY CONCERN HONEYBEE - AND EVERY BODY ELSE........

 

IS '' IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT ONLY EVIDENCE UP UNTIL MY MEDICAL IN SEPTEMBER COULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION'' CBBC THREAD 6 - THIS LINE IN PARTICULAR.

 

THANKS HONEYBEE BUT I FEEL THIS NEEDS ADDRESSING BIG TIME BY ALL OF US.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any information which is forthcoming after a decision is made which does not relate to the condition at the time of the decision will not be considered; a tribunal will only consider evidence which relates to the condition at the time the decision was made.

 

For example, let's look at occupational therapy. An OT will sometimes spend a period of time assessing someone's needs at various appointments and in varying environments before they will write a full report. If an OT was involved in assessing needs at the time the decision was made but did not write a report until after the decision was made, the tribunal would likely admit this evidence as the report though written after the decision, relates to the condition at the time the decision was made.

 

The decision that is being appealed against is that you were classified as fit for work at that time. If a condition was to deteriorate after the decision is made, they would not be able to consider this. They can only look at the facts which relate to the condition at the time of the decision being appealed against. A deteriorating condition or new medical evidence would fall under supersession or a new claim rather than appeal.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done on winning the appeal. Just to broaden the debate, isn't is worrying that the Tribunal Service appears to have "lost" the info that cbbc sent to them? If cbbc didn't have a copy then her appeal might have gone the other way. Has this happened to other people?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is Very Worring

 

Both Physical and Mental Problems....? what get Worse, evidence

supplied after med assessment(atos) not allowed?

 

YES or NO

 

Sorry I am a bit slow (ALL new to me)

 

I maybe slow , BUT what about ALL of the people who dont ,KEEP,COPY of ESA50(original) ...MAYBE because they do not have the strenght to

keep filling LOADESSSSS OF FORMS jUST TO GET WHAT THEY ARE

ENTITLED TO...

 

Thinking this is a Real EYE OPENER to me..

 

WELL DONE again CBBC KEEP asking Questions-KEEP FIGHTING

 

 

ALL OF US TOGETHER

Link to post
Share on other sites

What me thinks your saying Erica

 

I should do a New claim so then all new Evidence/ Info would be allowed IN,,

 

IT IS BONKERS.........

 

I have a Feeling the answer is going to be (Thats the SYSTEM)

 

DISGUSTING...

 

Whats that Report on Here..

1in10(SUPPORT/GROUP) 2in10(WORK/GROUP 7in10(????JSA?back to work,even if you have/are having difficulties (Physical/Mental)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello happyhamr. I hope you understand that I'm here trying to help and that cbbc used the template I put in a sticky that may have helped her win her tribunal. I'm not claiming much credit, because she did all the work and fronted up alone, which I could never have done.

 

I was always taught that CAPITAL LETTERS on email meant shouting, which in my fragile state I've never been able to cope with. I understand if you're stressed, but is there any chance that you could stop 'shouting' please? Otherwise, perhaps you would like to have your own thread where you can shout and I won't visit. This is still cbbc's thread.

 

My best, HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is Very Worring

 

Both Physical and Mental Problems....? what get Worse, evidence

supplied after med assessment(atos) not allowed?

 

YES or NO

 

There aren't many ESA questions with yes or no answers, but if your question is "Is medical evidence showing that the condition got worse after the ATOS medical allowed in an appeal against the result of that medical?" then the answer is "No".

 

If your condition worsens, you should ask the DMs to reconsider the decision. Evidence of the worsening of your health can be taken into account in this case. Making a new claim is also an option.

 

 

I maybe slow , BUT what about ALL of the people who dont ,KEEP,COPY of ESA50(original) ...MAYBE because they do not have the strenght to

keep filling LOADESSSSS OF FORMS jUST TO GET WHAT THEY ARE

ENTITLED TO...

 

People are only "entitled to" a benefit if they do the things that entitle them to it. In the case of ESA, that means filling in the forms, attending medicals and so on.

 

I do agree, though, that the rules and conditions are needlessly complex. That's a matter for the politicians to deal with, and I'm waiting with some interest to see what our new, elegantly coiffeured overlords are planning to do.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What me thinks your saying Erica

 

I should do a New claim so then all new Evidence/ Info would be allowed IN,,

 

IT IS BONKERS.........

 

I have a Feeling the answer is going to be (Thats the SYSTEM)

 

DISGUSTING...

 

Whats that Report on Here..

1in10(SUPPORT/GROUP) 2in10(WORK/GROUP 7in10(????JSA?back to work,even if you have/are having difficulties (Physical/Mental)

 

No, even if you made a new claim the evidence would not be permitted in an ongoing appeal because that evidence would relate to the new claim, and be considered as a part of the new claim, not the previous one which is being appealed against.

 

Evidence which does not relate to the condition at the time of the decision will not be admitted because it is viewed as irrelevant. Evidence which is available after the date of the decision but which relates to the condition at the time the decision was made, will be admitted because it is relevant to what is being appealed against. It is the same for evidence against the appeal. If there was an improvement in the condition after the decision to decline benefit, this too would not be admitted because the tribunal is there to decide if the decision which was made on the basis of the medical condition at that time was incorrect.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right well done CBBC :D

 

@ happyhamr

 

Read the info in my post on ESA in the Useful links sticky http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/125283-useful-links.html#post2928367

 

Myself, antone (in your thread) and Erica (in this) have all answered the question on evidence and submission.

 

The only problem is that most people do not understand that all evidence must be provided as quickly as possible and before a final decision is made by a DM. The DM has to adjudicate the claim at each stage and it is the lack of evidence to support your claim which triggers the request for more evidence (i.e. the ESA50 form, followed by the interviews). If enough supporting evidence is available the DM can at any stage make an award.

 

1 thing I'd like clarification on is this

 

Does any evidence you send have to be written in a non medical simplistic way so that the DM can understand it. i.e. a Doctors report which says you have condition XYZ in medical speak has to be phrased condition X means I can not sit down, Y means I can not walk etc. As the ESA Doctors guide says conclusions must be phrased in a non medical way so that the DM can understand it (well that's my take on it)

 

As for the notes going missing - Erica has posted in another thread that mail once received then has to be routed by an internal postal system to the correct place. It was also noted that sending items signed for recorded often delays acceptance. With the info being sent 2 weeks before the date it is highly likely that it is still working its way through the system trying to get to the correct place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is preferred that Doctors reports are written in laymens, rather than medical terms however if it is written in medical terms, the DM should consult with medical services (contracted by DWP) for the information to be put into words that can be deciphered; no decision should be made on the basis of a report unless the DM can actually decipher it or have it deciphered for them.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...