Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays refuse to deal with me - help!!!


Andy S
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6334 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear fellow bank charge recoverants,

 

I have taken an interest in this group for a while now and thanks to it I have successfully recovered bank charges from 3 different banks. Recently due to my own success at recovering my own charges I was asked by 3 friends and 2 members of my family to recover their bank charges. This I was happy to to do for free as a favour to them. My relatives are elderly and couldn't manage the process on their own and one of my friends is a guy who lives in sheltered accomodation. None of them had statements going back 6 years and since they live a distance away from me I thought the best way to get the bank statement information was to construct a 'Letter of Authority' which I would send to the bank with the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) giving them permission to deal with me. Here's the wording of the 'Letter of Authority' and the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) which I sent by recorded delivery to them with a personal cheque for £10:

 

------------------------------------------

From: My uncle

 

Please be advised that I, the undersigned, have instructed Andy S to act on my behalf in connection with bank charges that have been applied to my account over the past six years.

 

Please accept this letter as undisputed authority for Andy S to act on my behalf in connection with a review of any charges from your company. This authority will endure until cancelled in writing. Please deal directly with Andy S and provide him with any information he may request.

 

Confidential information can be released from any relevant filing system you may hold in connection with this matter, in accordance with my rights under the Data Protection Act, as and when requested by Andy S and sent to him in his official capacity as agent for the undersigned.

 

I can further confirm that Andy S has made a Data Subject Access Request on my behalf. Details relating to this request should similarly be forwarded to him, appropriately referenced and marked as confidential.

 

This letter gives Andy S full authority to act on behalf of the undersigned, in accepting or rejecting any refund payments offered and to refer this matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service, if necessary. Any compensation or refund which may be payable, following these investigations, should be made payable to ‘Andy S'.

 

Signature of account holder: James Hainsworth (my uncle)

Date of signature: 22nd November 2006

-------------------------------------------------------

 

--------------------------------------------

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Data Protection Act 1998 - Subject Access Request For James Hainsworth, Sort Code: xx-xx-xx, Account No: 12345678

 

I refer to the above named person who has instructed me to act on their behalf in connection with bank charges that have been applied to their account over the past six years. I enclose a ‘Form of Authority’ which you should read and make sure is filed accordingly and applied each and every time we contact your company.

 

Please send me the information which we are entitled to access under Section 7(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998 (the ‘1998 Act’) in relation to all charges which you have applied to the above noted account within the last six years from the date of this letter. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

If you require any further information please let me know as soon as possible.

 

I enclose a cheque in favour of your bank for the sum of £10 with respect to the maximum statutory fee for processing this request.

 

I look forward to your response within the maximum 40 day time limit under the 1998 Act.

 

Yours sincerely etc etc etc

---------------------------------------------------

 

So I posted the two letters together in an envelope to Barclays Bank, Churchill Place in London and thought no more about it until this morning when I got a letter back from Barclays returning my cheque for £10. Here's what it said:

 

--------------------------------------------------

Dear Andy S

 

Data Protection Act - Mr J Hainsworth

 

We refer to your recent letter concerning transactional data arising from a Barclays bank account.

 

Please be advised that this department is not in a position to proceed in this matter on the basis of the authority presented with your letter. We are therefore unable to correspond with you in connection with this individual.

 

Despite the above we can confirm that the requested information will be forwarded directly to the individual concerned. In this way the Bank will ensure compliance with all requirements arising from Section 7 of the Data Protection Act and of course our usual obligations regarding customer confidentiality.

 

As the Bank will be providing the information on a complimentary basis, your payment is returned herewith.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Peter Townsend

Manager, Barclays Data Protection.

___________________------------------------

 

So basically they are refusing to deal directly with me in spite of the 'Letter of Authority' I constructed. The problem is that my uncle is unable to deal with them himself and that because he lives a bit away it made sense for me to deal with them. Some of you may suggest sending the letters as if from his address and getting him to sign them but this would be too stressful and there are other greedy family members who would want to get their hands on his cash. A couple of questions for you tekkies:

 

1. Are Barclays right in this matter or are they using bullsh**t tactics?

2. What have I done wrong with the Letter of Authority?

3. Why won't they recognize it?

4. If they won't deal with the Data Protection Act request does this mean they will ignore my future requests for a refund with the same authority.

5. If I am to obtain payment in my name on his behalf, how now do I proceed in getting them to acknowledge me?

6. If it is so much hassle would I be better dealing with one of the companies on Google and paying them for the service? How can they act on behalf on customers with Letters of Authority and get charges back when I can't?

 

I am very stressed over this please can someone offer some solution to my problem.

 

Andy S

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sort of answered my own question here. I'm just off the phone to Peter Townsend of Barclays Bank and he said that because a request is made under the Data Protection Act he has to abide by it and ensure customer confidentiality is not breached. Therefore when he receives a request by a 3rd party for statements quoting this act it is now Barclays policy to send the information to the account holders address not the 3rd party.

 

What he did say though was that a letter sent requesting statements NOT mentioning the Data Protection Act would not reach his department and would be dealt with by customer services at the head office. In most cases they would likely send the requested statements and make only a £5 charge for this service.

 

So to summarize:

 

If you are a 3rd party requesting statements: Do not quote Data Protection Act, instead, send letter to Customer Services who will send you the requested information. Otherwise if you do quote the DPA then it will by-pass customer services and go straight to DPA officer who will send them to account holders address and not 3rd parties.

 

Any comments, thoughts or suggestions on this matter would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One way to find out is to try it - I would have thought cust services would need to send it to the acc. holders address due to security/confidentialty restrictions etc. I have 3rd party authority set up for my dad and he gets his statements send to him.

Still if it works I would like to know as I need to do this soon for family members.. good lcuk with it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

frankly they should deal with you on the basis of what you have written. One of the problems is tha the level of staff training in the banks is often very poor and variable. Some people would have allowed you to to deal and others won't.

 

Go to the bank and ask for a "third party authority form" this will be one of their own forms with their own logo and it will be something that either they understand or will realise that it is something that the bank approves of.

Fill-in the third party authority, get it signed by the individual who you are assisting and then begin. Make sure you keep a copy of the third party authority before you give it that the bank.

After that if the bank won't play ball then you just carry on to the steps an issue your court claims as necessary.

The people you are helping will have to sign in the court claims themselves -- otherwise it gets a bit more complicated.

However you can use your correspondence address in the court form and you can deal with everything. If you have to go the court (most unlikely of course) then the person you are helping will have to come with you that you will be to do all the talking.

I'm glad that Townsend seems to be a little bit helpful. Don't forget that until recently he is the guy who's been pronouncing on the status of Barclays personal data in relation to the Data Protection Act and has been refusing to supply personal data against subject access requests. In fact some of the stuff that he has written back to people has been unpleasant.

Now that the Information Commissioner has ruled that Barclays is is in breach of their statutory obligations, maybe Townsend is having second thoughts about the way he deals with people.

Certainly he will now have a better understanding of the Data Protection Act than he did a couple of weeks ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...