Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard defending my fee/PPI claim in court


parkerusm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have any experiences of going to court to reclaim credit card fees/PPI?

 

I have claimed £1020 from Barclaycard via Moneyclaim Online (MCOL) on behalf of my Dad.

They have said they will defend using Simmons & Simmons solicitors.

 

I have a good case for mis-selling of PPI (self-employed, pre-existing medical condition) and have decided to reclaim the fees as well.

 

Identical claims from Sainsbury's and Abbey have resulted in full repayment with interest after I rejected a partial offer. No hassle really.

 

Barclaycard are proving more difficult however,

they sent two letters saying it was being dealt with and that they would reply by a certain date.

 

They missed both their self-imposed deadlines, the last being Dec 4th '09.

 

Any help, advice or anecdotal evidence would be much appreciated.

Thanks

 

PS If there is a better thread to post this on please let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello parkerusm!

 

Welcome to CAG!

 

Barclays tend to take a harder stance than other bankers, not because they have any advantages, it's just their chosen way of doing things.

 

Don't be put off, but just take extra care to ensure you tackle them carefully.

 

Alanalana is a good man to get on board, but he's usually over on the PPI Forum, so it might be a good idea to pop over there, see what is going on, and make contact with him if you can.

 

He's on the Site Team, so may decide this Thread should be moved over to the PPI Forum to get better help.

 

Please shout if you need more help.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

they'll cave in just before the hearing

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Parkerusm.

 

I think this thread should stay here just now so we can deal with the penalty fees reclaim issue. Start a new thread in the PPI forum for help with that aspect of your claim.

 

Is there any reason BC didn't repay the fees voluntarily. What interest are you claiming from BC.

 

Did you use our Site's POC on your claim. If not, please confirm the exact POC as stated on your claim.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry for delayed reply and thanks for you help.

They have never actually offered me anything, not even a partial repayment or a final response. I have had two letters stating that my complaint would be dealt with by a certain date, the final one being Dec 4th 09. This acknowledged the delay in replying had exceeded the industry standard and said I could go to the Ombudsman if I wished. I have written twice since with no response so have submiited a county court claim via MCOL.

Some confusion may have been caused by the fact that I am pursuing another claim against Barclaycard at the same time on a card that was originally with Monument. I have had a partial refund on this (difference between £25 and £12 fees) but been refused any refund on the Payment Break Plan. This is now with the Ombudsman, but I'm not impressed with them so went straight to court with the other one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, on your POC's, do you seek repayment of PPI and charges or just charges.

 

Many have taken BC to court for charges (including compound interest) and won.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am claiming both in one go. More confident about winning PPI claim as my dad was sold it over the phone and is excluded by being self-employed and having a pre-exisitng medical condition, so I don't see how we can lose that one. Wasn't sure about the charges though.

When you say 'taken BC to court' do you mean actually appeared in front of a court and argued the case, or that they won by default as BC were unwilling to defend?

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Parkerusm,

 

If you issue a court claim, you must be prepared to prepare and submit all documents and evidence required to prove your case.

 

It is usual for BC to back down and negotiate settlement before a court hearing but you cannot rely on this. If they suspect you are unwilling to go into court, they will take advantage of this in negotiations and beat down the settlement figure.

 

Going into court is not as daunting as many might expect. It is normally dealt with in informal rooms and not a courtroom. The judge will be dressed normally - no wigs or gowns in sight.

 

Good preparation is the key. It is not enough to simply send in court papers and evidence. You must have a reasonable understanding of what you are doing and why.

 

You may have to actually appear in court on the day for either a Directions Hearing or a final hearing. But the judge will acknowledge that you appear as a Litigant in Person and make some allowances for that. You won't have to imitate Rumpole of the Bailey but you may have to answer some questions and stand up for yourself against the bank's legal rep.

 

Can you post up a copy of your POC's, hiding any personal data first.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sent to Barclaycard on Jan 27th 2010,

 

Barclaycard

Customer Relations Department

Barclaycard House

PO Box 5592

Northampton

NN4 1ZY

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account number: 4929XXXXXXXXXXX

Complaint Ref: XXXXXXX

 

I refer to PPI insurance and fees applied to my account, which I have requested you pay back with interest of 8%.

 

I last wrote to you regarding this account on 6th November 2009, repeating the original request for a payment in settlement of my claim. As I did not hear from you, I have taken action to claim the full amount claimed together with interest up to the date of judgment and court fees in the proceedings through the county court.

 

I submitted my claim through the Moneyclaim website and you have indicated an intention to defend against the claim. I am very confident that a court will find in my favour for the following reasons:

 

  • I am self-employed
  • I have a pre-existing medical condition (prostate cancer since 1997)
  • Your fees are inflated and illegal and cannot be justified in court
  • You have not provided a satisfactory response within the timescale set by yourselves. You last wrote to me on 20th November 2009, apologising for not having dealt with the matter. You stated that you expected to provide a full response by 3rd December 2009. Almost 8 weeks later I have heard nothing, which is completely unacceptable.

 

This insurance should never have been sold to me in the first place, and your fees are far higher than the admin tasks they are purported to pay for. I am completely confident that a court will find in my favour. I have made an identical claim against Abbey and have received a full refund of premiums with 8% interest as requested. This was without the need for court action. Obviously I will not accept anything less than the same from Barclaycard.

 

I will cancel the court action if the PPI premiums and the various fees are refunded to my account with 8% interest from the day they were applied, as well as the £70 fee I have had to pay to begin the County Court action. If not I will continue and fully expect to win.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Received a letter today from Simmons & Simmons solicitors acting on behalf of barclaycard, they had written to me before indicating that would defend the claim

 

Seems the poster above was correct about them caving in, as they have agreed to repay the full ammount of my Dad's claim! Great news and thanks for the advice.

 

"We refer to your claim filed in the Northampton County Court .... as you are aware from our defence we consider your claim to be inaedquately pleaded and that it cannot succeed.

 

However despite our assessemnt of your prospects of success, our client is mindful of the fact that this is a very small amount compared to the costs of pursuing the matter to trial. For that reason only the client is prepared to offer you £1122.60 which is the full amount claimed by you....."

 

My dad is delighted obviously, thanks guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Parkerusm,

 

This is great news. Congratulations !! :D

 

Is the refund being made to you direct, or being used to reduce the a/c balance.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...