| Computersupermarket.com | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
By Sadsob on 31st August 2007, 13:17
|
|
How true - I wish I visited this site before I bought from them. I placed and order 10 Days ago - What have I recieved? Nothing as yet. Sending e-mails or eNotes to them makes no difference? A phone call? Has anybody tried? I know that cancelling the order will result in FIGHTING for a refund and return of my money. (Unfortunately I paid by direct debit) Do yourself a favour and read their mission statement. What a joke!
|
|
By The Rockape on 31st August 2007, 17:30
|
|
Just an update, I've receeived a full refund from my bank, I just had to send by post proof of what had gone on, letters, I also printed of all my e-NOTES from the site as well. Only took about 5-7 days. Just lost out on the return postage.
A small price to pay for VICTORY. I don't know if VISA will blacklist a company for repeat offences, anyone from the banking industry know? You may also wish to report them to trading stadards or the DTI. An organisation called consumerdirect is well worth a call, government run and can offer advice on how to approach and tackle these |
|
By juggathehut on 1st September 2007, 13:16
|
Nice one Rockape!! Well pleased for you- didnt realise that bank direct debit payments had the same consumer protection as credit cards so that it well useful information (and comfort!) to me.Really glad you got your cash back- albeit lost out on the postage- around a tenner yeah? For my own ends, I made out a full report to Visa yesterday and included not only prints of all exchanges and the purchase, return and carriage docs, but also copies of postings off this site (hope no-one minds). I have asked them to review the suitability of their customer - and particularly the Visa Approved site marking they seem to have blagged. Am confident in the end of getting the cash back- but as you, will lose out on postage, the interest on the cash, and the sheer aggro of dealing with all this. I have today written and told them what I propose to do in that I shall report them to as many bodies as possible to cause them the maximum grief in return for the grief they have foisted on people. Whilst we are "fighters" to get our money back I wonder how many others have been in the same position and just given up- thus motivating this company to continue to conduct their affairs in this fashion? Cheers for your response and further info by the way!! |
|
By Sadsob on 4th September 2007, 16:55
|
|
It is week three now. Still no order arriving - they took money quick enough! No responce to e-mails (10 so far) or their so called eNotes(Given up on this one) I suppose the figh for my money back will now start in earnest. Please advise me on the course of action you followed or will follow to 'blacklist' this incompetent company. They should not be trading !!! Their mission statement: We believe that the people who buy from the Computer Supermarket are smart people who know what they want, that's why we have invested time in building a website that allows our customers to completely manage their account without our intervention. Sorry guys we have all been taken for a ride- the only part that reads true is their non intervension - not sending the products on order, that is!
![]() |
|
By juggathehut on 4th September 2007, 18:13
|
|
Well Sadsob- 3 weeks and not looking good. Personally I would just move straight away to attempt to recover a full refund here if I was you- after all we have all seen enough on here now to know what this retailer is like.
And the good news... after more threatening letters I have at last had a credit to my credit card for the refund of the goods!! Not the cost of the carriage back, but hey, progress at last. BINGO!! I resorted to threatening actions via several routes- and in fact HAVE done so- by making a full report to Visa of their misrepresentation, a full report to TV1s Watchdog and I intended to senf to DTI and Fair Trading etc. I asked them to draw this to the attention of their Directors as they will be the ones facing the repercussions etc.. Anyway, must have worked as they have now refunded- absolutely NO correspondence confirming this refund, and this is just another example of cowardice in my opinion. I REALLY hope Watchdog take this case up - if they contact me does anyone mind if I quote their posts here? Anyway, good luck to all having a fight with this company- my advice: dont prevaricate and go in hard with meaningful threats of actions you WILL take. I only wish that the laws that be had it within their remit to shut down this shower of sh** and all other companys like them. Regards all! |
|
By Comp Sup on 5th September 2007, 16:03
|
|
Hello,
My name is Ian Bird, a director here at Computer Supermarket. I'm sure you're not going to believe this but I'll give it a go anyway. I'm really sorry to hear of the problems you've had dealing with us. I'll be honest, we've let you down, our service has not been good enough. Since June our turnover has tripled, and we haven't coped very well with the surge in demand. We have new staff starting this week and an improvement in the customer service side of things will occur immediately. I'm not looking for sympathy, or trying to wriggle out of our responsibilities, just thought you deserved to know why things have gone so badly for you. We're not some faceless multi national company, we're hard working people and this huge upturn in business caught us by surprise. If I can assist anyone at all with any issue please contact me directly at ianbird@computersupermark et.com. Regards Ian Bird |
|
By juggathehut on 5th September 2007, 16:45
|
|
Well, first of all Ian, I will comment that I admire you for responding so publicly and I am sure others on this board will also welcome your comments and reassurances. Hence I would reply via these boards rather than by private email- although it is my intention to write separately as I am yet to be refunded the postage I am entitled to.
The reasoning behind the appalling customer service level may be difficult to accept for some- although I personally in my professional life was accustomed to seeing companys expand at such a rate as to outstrip current resources. Without going into the corporate logistics of this situation it is an unacceptable but not too uncommon event I can assure other readers. Although some may still of course reflect why there is a direct telephone number ONLY for new sales- clearly the attraction to new sales weighing greater with you than service to those who have already presented you with their money. Hopefully this will all change with the influx of your new staff and operations will continue upon accepted methodology and standards. Whilst I have now received my refund of the goods (lacking only postage as I said) and I am happy to accept your apology and explanation, there are others here that still have issues to resolve and hope that they have contacted you accordingly. This does not of course account for any unspoken-for customers with you maybe having the same problems, and all I would ask is that these also are afforded the respect and service they deserve and now get their issues dealt with. At the very minimum a short email at least acknowledging their concerns is the very minimum that I would expect each complainant to be provided with. I hope you will take this on board when prioritising your new available resources. Thank you for your response. |
Re: Computersupermarket.com
Well Hi there. I too wish I had read these reports before I had bought from Computersupermarket.com.
DO NOT BUY ANYTHING FROM Computersupermarket.com (EDIT).
We did get a delivery which was late and sent to the wrong address.
The screen had an american plug so we could not use it. The speakers are appalling quality.
The picture on the website is completely different and I had issue with the two usb ports which were supposed to be on the front of the tower are actually on the side which makes them really difficult to use becasue they are inaccessable for my sons setup.
The wireless card which I paid extra for does not pick up my wireless router at all.
The Vista operating system is now saying that it needs reinstalling as the free period has expired. This is obviously another con.
I have phoned, emailed, raised e-notes and absolutely nothing has happende. I did actually get to speak to Ian who promised me a plug/lead for the screen and technical support but this nevwe happened. My e-note was closed before it was even opened.
I am now trying to get a refund from Visa.
Will let you know what happens.
|
By unhappy_bunny on 15th October 2007, 04:10
|
|
Avoid like the plague!
(long review coming...) I was looking to build a machine, but while searching for components i found Computer Supermarket's 'Ultimate Gaming system'. For the spec it was an absolute snip - i couldn't afford to put this together for the money. Problem is, neither can these jokers. Once the system was ordered it was due to arrive in four to seven days (allowing for a weekend). It actually arrived two weeks after ordering, after many emails and phonecalls. A swift check of the unregistered, almost certainly not genuine copy of Vista revealed the last system backup point was fully one week after the machine was due to arrive. All would have been well had the system been up to the specification they'd given, but it fell far short. It would be quicker to recount what was satisfactory - it did have an E6850 inside, the DVD re-writer and hard drive weren't the brands specified but were just as good, and the speakers and the gpu were as specified, but seeing as they were the weakest links in the system, and quite mediocre, i couldn't get too excited. As for what was wrong... 2gb of slow, generic memory provided instead of the 4gb of Kingston specified. Monitor only had vga input and not dvi as specified. One european power lead provided with monitor (despite psu having 12V output) and no leads with cpu at all. Not a big issue, but annoying nonetheless. No registration number, recovery discs, documentation, pre-registration nor even hologram sticker for "genuine" Vista Home Premium 64bit. The case was only slightly shoddy, but considering the size of the chip i doubt they'd seated the heat probes correctly because it was apparently idling at about 17°C. Inside, the cable management was very poor and the cooling could best be descrbed as 'adequate'. After agreeing to give them the chance to put the system right, on the basis that they might try it on for those customers who might not spot the problems, i was pessimistic about what was going to eventually arrive. I wasn't to be disappointed (that is to say, i was). If they'd just stuffed another two gig of the same cheap memory into the old box it would have been an improvement on what did arrive: it did have 4gb (still not Kingston or even near equivalent) but now on a different mobo (admittedly with an e-sata port this time, but with an insufficient set of drivers) inside a totally shoddy case (in fact, supplied broken in several places) and some of the specified software not included. I'd waited a further week for this privilege, as well. It didn't take as much persuasion as thought for them to potentially agree to a refund, but but i'm still anticipating difficulties, as the machine has yet to be returned. The credit card company has been contacted, as have certain other parties. Customer service has been totally frustrating, hard to reach by phone (even with a direct number) and email replies are infrequent and unsatisfactory. I shall be building my own machine... i won't be spending much more than i would on this system, but i will be getting premium components and it will take a fraction of the time and effort involved than when dealing with this shower. |
|
By coolactuary on 28th October 2007, 20:55
|
|
Users will have noted Ian Bird's intervention. Appears pretty reasonable doesn't it / he?
However here are a few email exchanges you may be interested in. I won't bore you with the inaccuracies in Ian's statements, his complete failure to acknowledge non-timely delivery of the product, that it wasn't the one I'd been promised, that its manual was unusable and, not least, that the product (an MP3 player) suffered from the fundamental drawback of not playing MP3s in a way which sounded anything like any other MP3 player I've heard. Judge for yourself whether this is a man lijkely to be able to resolve the issues he invites you to email him. Finally he says the returns procedure is clearly set out on the website. we did not find it so at the time and, once again, no reply was received to an e-note requesting clarification. It is IMHO unlikely that a company can place restrictions on a consumer's right to return goods. It's likely to be an unfair contract term I'd have thought, not that we need to go there. I'm now off to Mastercard and Birmingham Trading Standards... ************************* ************************* ************************* ************************* **** Ian I note from this link http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/computer-services-reviews-write/110720-computersupermarket-com.html that you are a director of Compueter Supermarket. I have to say that I am shocked by your language within the current email exchange. It is rather different from the customer-focussed picture you presented online, in response to people whose expressed views were much more aggressive than mine. It's one thing for a customer (who thinks they've been treated badly) to sound off. Quite another for a director of the company to do so. I had assumed that you were an under pressure customer services person. It is clear that I am far from the only person who has issues with your company. Anyway, since you have *again* not replied to my email - a trait other customers have noted - I am posting an update to the above address. I will also be asking for a full refund from my credit card company and reporting you to Birmingham Trading Standards. I never threatened legal action and, given that your posting to the above address seeks to paint you as a successful company overwhelmed by customer demand, am again amazed that you have the time to tie up your resources in the way you suggest. I for one intend to take matters further while minimising inconvenience to me. Just in case you don't remember the material in the above link - and since this material will form a key part part of my complaint to Birmingham Trading Standards, I set out some of the material below. It's a sorry tale, seemingly including allegations from your customers that you are engaged in illegal activity. I'll leave an assessment of that to BTS of course. A very final point on enotes. I raised the mechanism for returning goods in an enote. This remained unanswered. Funnily enough none of my enotes were answered, none were assigned, but all have status "closed". What on earth is going on? ************************* *************************** *************************** *************************** *************************** *************************** *************************** ** Lots of quotes from this website to remaind Ian of your views followed ... ************************* *************************** *************************** *************************** *************************** *************************** *************************** ** -----Original Message-----
IanFrom: coolactuary Sent: 22 October 2007 20:25 To: ian Subject: RE: Complaint to Computer Superstore, Computer Components, Computer Cases, Graphics Cards and Mp3 Players in the UK Importance: High I am sorry you found my email overtly aggressive. I note that you did not reply to my email dated 12 October and this, of course, did not help matters. In terms of the misleading nature of the website, the website showed hundreds of the make of MP3 player I ordered as being available. The player took an enormous time to turn up (I was promised an MP4 player as compensation) and I queried the delay. I was told that there were none in stock and that the website was wrong. My wife stayed in one day when we were told it would turn up. It didn't. Eventually two players turned up and we had to refuse delivery of the second. Much (or even all) of this is covered in my e-notes. Please feel free to consult them. Taking any of the forms of action below is very much *not* what I want to do. However the goods were not of merchantable quality and I do expect to be able to get my money back. The fact of the matter was that your company has received the goods back and I've not had any evidence that the refund is going to be made. I look forward to your confirming the date by which a refund will be made. Regards
|
|
By sharon ev737 on 13th November 2007, 13:19
|
|
i bought a computer from computersupermarket on sept 25th it came late and broken since then i have returned it asking for a refund and have heard nothing ive now threatened them with court action and still nothin from them. it was my kids christening and they got money as gifts so they put most of their money in to buy it while i payed the rest. i dont know how a company can treat people like this they wont return ur notes or even acknowledge you. all i want is my money bacxk but as yet i havent and from what i have read on here i dont think its gonna be anytime soon either. can anyone tell me what i can do next.
|
|
By coolactuary on 13th November 2007, 20:54
|
|
|
Quote:
I hope you asked for an RMA number before returning the goods. I was too wound up to find how to do this. I phoned for instructions but no one answered. I did at least pay by credit card, so would have been able to get the money back from them if it they hadn't eventually coughed up. Probably best to keep away from legals I'd guess. Their pockets will be deeper than yours. There's always trading standards as well as the c/card company. |
|
By sharon ev737 on 13th November 2007, 21:04
|
|
i did get an rma number and have followed the instructions on returning the computer they have had it back 3 wks now and i still haven't heard anything from them. i paid with my bank card an i dont think i can get the money back via the bank can i? i e mail and send them rma notes and still nothing heard from the company.
|
|
By MP4user on 15th January 2008, 14:43
|
|
I bought one of their MP4 Players with built in FM Radio.
I currently can't record from the FM Radio, although the manual and their website tells me I can. Can anyone help? it runs firmware 00.00.0000 does this need upgrading? |
|
By Sol on 12th February 2008, 14:25
|
|
*This is quite a long post as I've included emails sent between myself and Comp Supermarket.*
I am so at this company!My dad ordered a pc for me for Christmas last year, and it still doesn't work in February. It has been sent back to them on 3 separate occasions and each time it returns, there's another problem. When it first arrived in November, the USB port at the front of the tower collapsed into it and the CD drive would not work. On the second occasion, the PC died completely and the back of the tower caved in ie. where the keyboard, mouse is plugged in etc. It came back to me again in January and now the front cover of the USB port is missing and the tower is all scratched. I obviously won't accept it as my dad paid over £350 for it. After months of trying to get to speak to someone, I find the manager's email address on the Consumer Action Group website and contact him directly. Here's some of his emails. Let me know what you think. From:Paul
Sent: 11 February 2008 17:58 To: ian Subject: RE: Faulty computer Hi,
I'm just off the phone to Neil at Tech Support.
The first return was due to the front USB ports on the tower caving into the system and the CD rom not working.
The second return was due to the tower 'dying' and the back of the tower caving in ie. where you plug in the keyboard, mouse etc.
It is being returned again because the USB ports are still not secure enough to be used regularly and the door which covers the USB port has been snapped off, as well as it being scratched all over.
Neil said it was due to the couriers being rough with the parcels and it was being damaged in transit. This is certainly not the case in the latest return as the door that covers the USB ports should be in the box, but it's not. Besides if it was due to the courier damaging the products, surely that is between yourselves and them, not us.
Regards
xxxxxxxxxxx
Reply Mr xxxxxxx,
Prior to our PC systems being dispatched they're subjected to a 144 point inspection, it would be commercial suicide to send computers out that do not work as the cost of resolving problems later is prohibitive. I can assure you that your machine left us in perfect condition, the problems you have experienced are unfortunate and frustrating for us all. We send these machines out in good faith, despite your accusations, otherwise we would not be permitted to either be a member of ISIS, or to actually take payment over the internet.
Prior to signing your contract of sale you had to tick a box stating 'I have read, understood and agree to be bound by your terms and conditions of sale'. The following clause is clearly highlighted, in fact in your order email it states that all items should be signed for as either 'damaged' or 'unchecked', a further email confiming this is sent some 12 hours after your order has been dispatched also. The reason for this is that all our goods have transit insurance, when you receive a parcel you are not only signing to say you've received your goods but received them in a good condition. Once you have signed to say that the goods have been received in a good condition our insurance ends and we're unable to claim for any subsequent damage you may notice.
7.4 When signing for goods customers must ensure that they either check the goods and sign to confirm that they have received the products in good condition or sign for the parcel as ‘damaged’ or ‘unchecked’. Failure to sign for a parcel as ‘damaged’ or ‘unchecked’ will invalidate any later claim that the customer may have if the goods are proven to have been damaged in transit.
Despite your failure to sign as either 'damaged' or 'unchecked' on any of the three occasions you've received a PC, despite the tone of your email to me, despite the fact I could have let you proceed with legal action before making you aware of the contract you signed I am here willing and ready to assist you further. We have over 14,000 customers a year, and despite what you may have read on a selective website we go out of our way to assist customers. If you would like me to get this item collected and replaced then please let me know.
Regards xxxxxxx From: Paul
Sent: 11 February 2008 18:23 To: ian Subject: RE: Faulty computer Dear Sir, The item was signed for when it was received and was set up immediately. Whe I set it up the product was not in the advertised state ie. the USB ports were caved in and the CD rom wouldn't work. This was reported and returned to you immediately. It is your slow pace at getting things returned to me that has meant that in February I am still without a working computer. I don't like your tone either. 3 months have passed and I still can't use your computer; your phone lines obviously aren't open until 6pm and your own staff have admitted that it could be due to couriers. Be assured that I will take action against you if you do not refund me immediately. I'm sure you're aware, that any consumer who receives a product which is not in its advertised state, is entitled to a full refund. I am exercising that right as a consumer. If I take legal action against you, I will also forward on the legal costs and charge statutory interest. Regards xxxxxxxx Mr xxxxx,
I have tried to assist you, please proceed with your legal action. I can prove however you received your goods as advertised and in perfect working order, you signed to say you did.
Regards
xxxxx
From: Paul
Sent: 11 February 2008 18:40 To: ian Subject: RE: Faulty computer Dear Sir,
I signed to say I received the product, not to say the goods were in working order. You can check through the various emails and e-notes I've sent you to say this.
The goods were not in working order and never have been. I have kept all contact made with you and will use it to make a case against you.
I note your unwillingness to sort this out and will be contacting the various consumer organistions also.
Regards
xxxxxxxx
Mr xxxxxx,
You certainly did state you'd received the PC in a good condition, it states it quite clearly in the box you sign when receiving an item from City Link. Playing devils advocate how do I know you haven't dropped the machine by accident, damaged it on purpose? Mr xxxxx, seriously I am here to assist you in any way I can, if you choose then legal route then fine, that is your choice. I can confirm, from experience, what will happen however as I said the choice is yours. If you change your mind please let me know, if I do not hear from you by tomorrow I will have to unfortunately pass your case onto our legal department so that they can resolve this.
Regards xxxxx From: Paul
Sent: 11 February 2008 18:59 To: ian Subject: RE: Faulty computer Dear Sir,
Just to clarify, do you expect your customers to open the box, check everything is there, set up the PC and then sign for it? I am sure the courier would not be willing to wait the half hour or so it would take to do this.
Mr xxxxxx
No, that's why you can sign for it as unchecked, as clearly stated in our terms and conditions of sale. This situation only covers damage in transit, smashed cases, motherboards becoming dislodged etc. Under contract law the goods become your property the second you sign for them, so we insure the goods until they become your property. If you had problems that were not damage in transit then of course that's covered, but the damage you described can only have been caused by the parcel having been dropped or mistreated either by the customer or the courier. Mr xxxxxx, as I've said before I understand your frustration, please understand ours. We can prove the item left us in perfect condition (engineers report) and if we have to we can also prove it arrived with you in perfect condition (delivery note). We could turn away from you now and leave you to it, but we're still offering to resolve this for you.
Regards xxxxxx |
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 1576
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.








Nice one Rockape!! Well pleased for you- didnt realise that bank direct debit payments had the same consumer protection as credit cards so that it well useful information (and comfort!) to me.
at this company!