Hello,
Good news on the 6 year front, then? Ha, they've been asking for this for some time, I must say.
Only now do they stand a chance of being held accountable for the full extent of their (foolish, I think) actions in administering the charge initially.
And we have the opportunity of recovering what's owed, importantly in an acceptable form? And then watching them retract which will be sweet music to anyone's ears.
It has a certain "je ne sais quoi" about it when an org. or company is called to (the)stand for it's misdemeanours.
All about levels, mate, it's all on a different level. (Ha)
I was gobsmacked when I first came across the charge and I still am.
I really hope justice is served.
How the heck did they justify the charge initially? That's what I can't understand, it was stark staring obvious, wasn't it?
I had to get that off my chest: I hope it makes sense. It doesn't quite read how I'd like it to but, anyway, - Anyone?
