Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Do your Internet search here Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | Do your Internet search here:-
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Are you a victim of unfair trading? Check it out The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008 Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Students Come here if you think that you have consumer-style problems which are connected to your status as a student | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  |
4th September 2008, 23:43
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | SLC/Capquest ignoring my request for evidence of debt Hi everyone,
I've found this site immensely useful and reassuring in addressing my problem (details below), and have been searching the fora here for an answer to these particular questions. I haven't found one, so I've registered and started a new thread to throw myself on the mercy of the forum (and this post is quite long... bear with me please!).
I was a student between 1992 and 1995 and took out student loans in each of the 3 years. I deferred my repayments for a few years while I was a postgrad then moved overseas. At some point while I was overseas (probably 1999, certainly prior to 2000) I lost contact with the SLC (either didn't tell them a new address as I was moving very often or I did and they didn't act on it - can't remember now) and haven't contacted them since.
Move forward to last month, when I received a demand from capquest for repayment of the loan. I searched online, being vaguely aware of the limitation act and enforcement of debts being statute barred after 6 years, and found confirmation of that here amongst other places.
I wrote to them, saying that I didn't acknowledge any debt to them as any loan I may have had would have been statute barred. I then received an illiterate letter saying that student loans 'were not covered by statute barred' - which I took to mean not covered by the limitation act. I knew this wasn't true, and told them so in writing. I asked them to provide evidence that I owed them anything at all. Since then I have had two more letters (one from capquest this morning and one purporting to be from solicitirs but directing me to reply to capquest, not them) ignoring my request and threatening court action, originally this monday but now on the 7th september.
Now I'm pretty sure that they can't proceed without any evidence that I (a) owe them anything at all and (b) that any debt is not statute barred, but I'm not sure how to bring this to some kind of conclusion, so on to my questions (at last! I know, brevity's not my forte...)
(1) Can I use a subject access request to get them to reveal when my last contact with them was? Most people seem to be using them to query charges. I was thinking a CCA request would be win-win, as if they produce one then it's clear the limitation act applies and if they don't, there's no debt, right?
(2) Do firms like capquest ever actually issue proceedings under these circumstances (I mean when they have no evidence that a debt is not statute barred). A lawyer friend (in a different field of law) I spoke to about this thought these types of company wouldn't worry too much about looking daft in court if there was a chance a district judge might make a strange decision in their favour, so they might go ahead anyway. I can't risk actually getting a CCJ.
and (3) (last one!) I saw that student loans would soon go on credit ratings - how would my credit rating be affected if I did make this go away as statute barred debt?
Thanks for your forbearance, and for any answers to my questions! |
| |
5th September 2008, 00:20
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: SLC/Capquest ignoring my request for evidence of debt (1) Can I use a subject access request to get them to reveal when my last contact with them was?
Yes. Your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) should ask for all of your personal data- including a list of charges and the dates applied to the debt. Once you have this list you can start a claim to get them removed.
(2) Do firms like capquest ever actually issue proceedings under these circumstances.
Yes, and they usually lose against Caggers.
clapquest- a joke 
Last edited by noomill060; 5th September 2008 at 00:26.
|
| | |