Ok,
I sent SLC a letter stating that one of my loan agreements wasn't signed by them and hence not executed, plus request for charges to be removed, and an offer of full and final settlement (about 25%).
I've had a letter back, usual waffle about charges not being excessive, a government body, blah blah. But they've now sent me a copy of my credit agreement which now appears to be signed on behalf of SLC!
So, as i have a copy without their signature, are they resorting to fraudulent means by signing it retrospectively and providing me with that? Surely, if it was signed originally, the copy i have would have their signature on?? Unfortunately for me, the account this agreement refers to only has a small balance compared to the other account with them

But, given their behaviour, can i throw any counter-argument at them regarding both my accounts?
They've also rejected my offer of settlement stating "We're unable to accept settlement figures on Student Loan accounts as funding is made available from taxpayers monies".
Any advice welcomed....