Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other!
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
    • Regarding a driver, that HAS paid for parking but input an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number.   This is an easy mistake to make, especially if a driver has access to more than one vehicle. First of all, upon receiving an NTK/PCN it is important to check that the Notice fully complies with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 before deciding how to respond of course. The general advice is NOT to appeal to the Private Parking Company as, for example, you may identify yourself as driver and in certain circumstances that could harm your defence at a later stage. However, after following a recent thread on this subject, I have come to the conclusion that, in the case of inputting an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number, which is covered by “de minimis” it may actually HARM your defence at a later stage if you have not appealed to the PPC at the first appeal stage and explained that you DID pay for parking and CAN provide proof of parking, it was just that an incorrect VRN was input in error. Now, we all know that the BPA Code of Practice are guidelines from one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans to follow, but my thoughts are that there could be problems in court if a judge decides that a motorist has not followed these guidelines and has not made an appeal at the first appeal stage, therefore attempting to resolve the situation before it reaches court. From BPA Code of Practice: Section 17:  Keying Errors B) Major Keying Errors Examples of a major keying error could include: • Motorist entered their spouse’s car registration • Motorist entered something completely unrelated to their registration • Motorist made multiple keying errors (beyond one character being entered incorrectly) • Motorist has only entered a small part of their VRM, for example the first three digits In these instances we would expect that such errors are dealt with appropriately at the first appeal stage, especially if it can be proven that the motorist has paid for the parking event or that the motorist attempted to enter their VRM or were a legitimate user of the car park (eg a hospital patient or a patron of a restaurant). It is appreciated that in issuing a PCN in these instances, the operator will have incurred charges including but not limited to the DVLA fee and other processing costs therefore we believe that it is reasonable to seek to recover some of these costs by making a modest charge to the motorist of no more than £20 for a 14-day period from when the keying error was identified before reverting to the charge amount at the point of appeal. Now, we know that the "modest charge" is unenforceable in law, however, it would be up to the individual if they wanted to pay and make the problem go away or in fact if they wanted to contest the issue in court. If the motorist DOES appeal to the PPC explaining the error and the PPC rejects the appeal and the appeal fails, the motorist can use that in his favour at court.   Defence: "I entered the wrong VRN by mistake Judge, I explained this and I also submitted proof of payment for the relevant parking period in my appeal but the PPC wouldn't accept that"   If the motorist DOES NOT appeal to the PPC in the first instance the judge may well use that as a reason to dismiss the case in the claimant's favour because they may decide that they had the opportunity to resolve the matter at a much earlier stage in the proceedings. It is my humble opinion that a motorist, having paid and having proof of payment but entering the wrong VRN, should make an appeal at the first appeal stage in order to prevent problems at a later stage. In this instance, I think there is nothing to be gained by concealing the identity of the driver, especially if at a later stage, perhaps in court, it is said: “I (the driver) entered the wrong VRN.” Whether you agree or not, it is up to the individual to decide …. but worth thinking about. Any feedback, especially if you can prove to the contrary, gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I receive ESA

 

Ah. Was hoping you wouldn't say that - although I used to be an ESA processor, I left before the WP got involved. What I'll do, though, is send a message to one of our WP watchers asking if he knows. He checks in on this thread often anyhow.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I receive ESA

 

WRAG or Support Group ?

Do you have any full time carer responsibilities towards children under five, other ESA claimants, or elderly relatives ?

 

If the answers are WRAG and no carer responsibilities, then I'd suggest looking at Annex 3 of http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/wp-pg-chapter-3a-22-october-2012.pdf - If the letter does not conform to the prescribed template and instead uses text intended for JSA claimants, you have grounds to challenge it.

 

As you have a sick note from your GP*, the standard advice would be to notify the JCP and the WP provider using a JSA28 form. But this is intended for claimants on JSA, not ESA - I would strongly suggest calling your local JCP office and asking what the equivalent ESA form is. If they can not provide the form, I'd suggest writing a short letter to both the WP provider and the DWP/JCP informing them of your inability to attend. This would come under the heading of "a change in circumstances" and fulfil the requirements set out in http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/wp-pg-chapter-5.pdf .

 

*) Just a thought: Does the sick note just say "do not operate machinery or drive" or does it go further and confine you to the house ?

If the former and you find there is no way out, then you must be accompanied by an advocate to ensure that you are not subjected to undue pressure (and as always, record the meeting in full).

 

Much of the DWP guidance for Work Programme providers is geared towards JSA claimants, and it is often difficult to pick out which sections do not apply to ESA claimants - In these cases, it is worth getting written clarification from the DWP/JCP.

Edited by Mr.P

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, one year at Ingeus done. I think over the past year I must have been called in about 6 times (im on ESA WRAG).

 

The last time I was there (last week) there was a whole group of young folks who must have been in their 20's... all lined up for some interview with some serious looking bloke in a suit.

 

I see my adviser one more time and then apparently i get moved to the "Second Stage" which involves me going to a group meeting with other folks on ESA and then getting a new adviser. Kinda will miss my old adviser :(

 

I think the Ingeus place I go to is empty most of the time...was usually only me, one person at a computer doing jobsearch and a whole bunch of staff sitting around chatting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I was put forward for a minimum wage admin role working for a company in partnership with Ingeus. My advisor told me I was perfect for the role and would breeze through any interview. It was an'easy win'.

 

Just recieved an email that I after careful consideration of my CV (Which has been rewritten by my advisor) Ingeus will not be pursuing my application any further and due to the high number of applicants, they can't give me any feedback.

 

You know, I am actually looking forward to my next appointment :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

A very interesting transcript of oral evidence taken before the work and pensions committee 'the role of JCP in the reformed welfare state' http://freepdfhosting.com/3494568f4b.pdf

 

Some edited highlights from the UM forum http://unemploymentmovement.com/forum/chat-a-rap/7230-oral-evidence-taken-before-the-work-and-pensions-committee#24991

 

So insiders are admitting that sanction targets do exist they are just called something else, ESA claimants that fall foul of mandatory revision who try to claim JSA will inevitably 'fall through the cracks' because they cannot comply with conditionality, and JCP actively 'frustrate' people off benefits.

 

On training, Colin Booth who was there representing the Association of colleges said

 

The DWP and Jobcentre Plus are a barrierto people doing longer skills courses to get them into work. Because they are focused on getting people off the unemployment register, they are very focused on referring people to short interventions to get people into work, but they are actually often a barrier.

This is not the Jobcentre Plus offices, although sometimes they are a bit inconsistent. This is the whole system.

We run a system that means that we frequently get adults who are very motivated, who sign up for courses, and they are then prevented from doing those courses and then we see them again when they are referred and often mandated into training later.

 

We run a system that creates barriers to people participating in longer skills courses and participating on their own terms and with their own motivation, only to refer them under conditionality back into the same system later sometimes.

The document pretty much backs up the experiences of people posting on here, at least the the work and pensions committee have a better idea of how JSA claimants get treated, not that they are likely to change anything.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Osdset, A very revealing set of documents, not just with the points you make but with JPC staff training, holes in the system that make it impossible for some people with medical condition to claim any benefit, the mind set of staff to make sanctions and the lack of disability advisers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole Work Programme set up is a shambles, set up by people with no real life experience of what it is like to be on the dole, and should be scrapped as it has now been proven to be pretty useless (just my opinion).

 

I find that the whole system is grinding to a halt and will probably be privatised if the Conservatives win the next election.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I was put forward for a minimum wage admin role working for a company in partnership with Ingeus. My advisor told me I was perfect for the role and would breeze through any interview. It was an'easy win'.

 

Just recieved an email that I after careful consideration of my CV (Which has been rewritten by my advisor) Ingeus will not be pursuing my application any further and due to the high number of applicants, they can't give me any feedback.

 

You know, I am actually looking forward to my next appointment :smile:

 

Would be a nice chance to report Ingeus to the DWP for losing you a possible job by their 'improvement' of your CV which was subsequently rejected. You could argue that had they submitted your untouched version it may have gotten through.

 

As Ingeus always woffle on about 'getting feedback from employers' I think it's only fair that you should pester them for some too - namely; why did your application not go through when you'd been assured it was a breeze?

 

If my experience of Ingeus' CV writing 'skills' are anything to go by, your CV would have ended up being bland, dull and littered with spelling mistakes once one of their advisors had finished with it.

 

Give 'em hell :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole Work Programme set up is a shambles

No, it works perfectly. It moves money from the taxpayer to the private contractors. In other European countries this system is called 'mafia'.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole Work Programme set up is a shambles, set up by people with no real life experience of what it is like to be on the dole, and should be scrapped as it has now been proven to be pretty useless (just my opinion).

 

I find that the whole system is grinding to a halt and will probably be privatised if the Conservatives win the next election.

Conversely, if and when Labour return, the likelihood is that they will reintroduce something more insidious than the Work Programme which was conversely worse than the Flexible New Deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If my experience of Ingeus' CV writing 'skills' are anything to go by, your CV would have ended up being bland, dull and littered with spelling mistakes once one of their advisors had finished with it.

 

Give 'em hell :)

 

When Ingeus altered my cv it came back with 22 spelling mistakes i kid you not :roll:

 

It was also very dull to read etc.....i dont use the one they have altered i use the orginal which i am more than happy with :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The last time I was there (last week) there was a whole group of young folks who must have been in their 20's... all lined up for some interview with some serious looking bloke in a suit.

 

Its always the young ones, who get put forward for interviews at ingeus.

As this is where they see a potential bonus if the person gets the job!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When Ingeus altered my cv it came back with 22 spelling mistakes i kid you not :roll:

 

It was also very dull to read etc.....i dont use the one they have altered i use the orginal which i am more than happy with :wink:

S got me in for it with m but m just sat at his desk, he claimed its best that I do it myself, his only 'help' was to remove dates, he was useless and he claimed this help was my idea and when I said it wasn't he virtually called me a liar and was too lazy to call s to confirm that I was telling the truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

S got me in for it with m but m just sat at his desk, he claimed its best that I do it myself, his only 'help' was to remove dates, he was useless and he claimed this help was my idea and when I said it wasn't he virtually called me a liar and was too lazy to call s to confirm that I was telling the truth

 

Sounds about right for Ingeus, i have 2 cv's one Ingeus think i use and one i do use....Ingeus are useless at cv's

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend corrected their spelling and grammar (they kept changing tenses within the same paragraph!) on the re-write of her CV. I have done similar.

 

I really think their CV writing is appalling, I can do a lot better (my re-write got me a short term job and I am in line for another job with the same CV).

 

There are so many older people being left out of the job market now because of the PM's laudable attempt to instill a 'solid work ethic' into the younger generation.

 

The trouble is that a section of that generation have been given to believe that they can walk into a job earning a lot of money just because they have a degree. They don't have the 'life skills' they need to cope on their own, let alone be told what to do by somebody 'lesser' than themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The turnover of staff within the WP is such that they are virtually pulling people off the street willy nilly to take jobs as 'advisors' hence the deplorable standards. Anyone with any training within the WP industry left long ago and turned the lights off on the way out.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The turnover of staff within the WP is such that they are virtually pulling people off the street willy nilly to take jobs as 'advisors' hence the deplorable standards. Anyone with any training within the WP industry left long ago and turned the lights off on the way out.

 

Have you ever applied for a job at ingeus? its not as easy as you think.....................As you get a long questionaire to fill in......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they get more bonus for a younger person than an older person?

 

They get more money for "difficult" clients - sick, disabled and so on. I don't think merely being over 50 qualifies a person as "difficult", but I'm not sure.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have finished with Ingeus months ago when I found a job they said I wouldn't need to come to any more appointments even though I then didn't end up taking the job as found out it was only commission based.

 

I have signed back on on new claim and everything since then but I keep receiving constant phone calls from Ingeus departments and texts asking 'Justasking how you are getting on in work'. Every few months the advisor I had calls my phone and I don't answer it, he then emails me and says something like 'Please send me your new number I can't get through to you'. Up till now I have got so fed up of the constant phone calls I just answered and told him I am now self-employed. He then says 'That's fine, we'll speak again in a few weeks'

 

Why do they keep phoning me every few months? I have told them I am not in that job anymore but have gone self-employed thinking that would get rid of them but they still continue to pester me. If it's not phone calls it's emails.

 

Don't really want to change my number, and even if I do they still know my email.

 

Anyone know if an Ingeus advisor can contact you through a personal site like Facebook because he has my email or is that a breach of their policy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever applied for a job at ingeus? its not as easy as you think....

Did look at their recruitment site - To search and apply for vacancies, you have to register. Registration takes place when you first apply for a vacancy.... Brain dead F.W.

 

Would I actually want to work there - Not unless there is a significant change in temperature in Hell.

 

I have finished with Ingeus months ago when I found a job they said I wouldn't need to come to any more appointments even though I then didn't end up taking the job as found out it was only commission based.

 

Anyone know if an Ingeus advisor can contact you through a personal site like Facebook because he has my email or is that a breach of their policy?

 

Has 104 weeks passed since your very first appointment with them ?

If not, you are still in their grubby little grasp whilst claiming JSA/ESA. If the 104 week period is past, you can write a cease and desist letter threatening to report them for harassment and breaches of the telecoms regulations.

 

Most work places have a policy on the use of facebook during company time - I don't have access from work (nor do I use it at home). If you do get any attempt at contact via facebook, record it in your diary and at it to the list of harassment.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Don't really want to change my number, and even if I do they still know my

email

It really cannot be said too often - if you don't want to be hassled and harassed do not provide them with a phone number or e-mail address. New consignees please note!

You are perfectly within your rights to tell them that your preferred and only means of communication is by post. They won't like this but will just have to lump it provided you stick politely to your policy. This also means not telling the JCP this information (it will be passed to the WP on your attachment). Ask the JCP to remove the info from their records if they already have it. They did this for me and I survived 2 years at A4greed without one phone call or e-mail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...