Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
    • Please post up their letter so we understand what they've asked. You need to cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • Hello,  I received the standard letter.  I don't understand No. 3: If this is in relation to a ticket irregularity, then if you were unable to produce a pass because you did not have it with you or if your pass was withdrawn because you were unable to produce a valid photocard to accompany it, please enclose a photocopy of the pass/photocard with your reply. Question: do i enclose my photocard? my partner's freedom pass was confiscated.
    • LFI is spot on. In fact you could sue UKPC for breach of GDPR, as UKPC knew full well right from the start that their case was hopeless.  They should never have asked for your details from the DVLA. Take some time to think if that is a road you want to go down.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance company cancelled my policy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4668 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya, I'm hoping that someone can help me with this insurance matter

 

Briefly, I had a car insurance policy which I was paying by direct debit and had also paid an upfront fee. I owed around £250 on it and decided to send them a cheque to pay in full and cancel the direct debit.

 

I received a letter a day or two later saying that my bank had informed them that the direct debit had been cancelled and to re-instate it so that the policy isn't cancelled, but I thought that the cheque had crossed in the post.

 

I have today received another letter saying that the policy had been cancelled and they had added a cancellation fee and took some off my debit card too!!!!

 

I got straight in touch and they said that they had never received my letter and cheque and that there is no way the policy can be re-instated. Is this true ??

 

I am furious, I have paid almost £500 for 4.5 months of insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you didn't phone them before you decided to change the payment method, you should have done. As soon as you cancel a direct debit mandate at your bank, a day or two later it appears on an accounts report at the Insurers. They then send a letter requesting new payment instructions advising that the policy would be cancelled if new payment instructions were not provided. After a period of payment instructions not being received, notice of cancellation is then issue. Many Insurers have outsourced the handling of cheques to processing companies. So the cheque and letter may not have been seen by the Insurers accounts department. They might eventually get a report from the processing company saying that a payment was received for your policy, but too late to stop the cancellation.

 

I think this is a genuine misuderstanding on your part, as to the way Insurance companies work. You should therefore phone the Insurers and ask to speak to customer relations or a complaints handler, to see what you can do. Many Insurers will not reinstate a policy unless they have good reason to do so. Speak to your bank to see if the cheque has been cashed and if so by whom and on what date. Once a cheque is processed it goes back to your bank, with processing details applied to the back of the cheque. If you find out the Insurers had money via the cheque before the cancellation, there is no reason for them not to reinstate. They can do it, if they want to. All they have to do is speak to their IT people if necessary and they will reinstate the record. They often do this, when they have a problem with the policy record.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Uncle B. It all actually makes sense with hindsight, but unfortunately no less annoying for me!

 

That's the trouble these days, us ''little people'' are expected to be experts in every field and none of these big companies have any compassion for genuine mistakes.

 

I will check with the bank re. the cheque tomorrow, but to be honest, I'm not expecting them to re-instate the policy because their tone and manner was really bad. They actually said that they are unable to re-instate a policy by law !!

 

Thanks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Super

 

Send a Formal Letter of Complaint Send it Recorded. Explain whats happened and what you want them to do. Tell them you will take the matter to the FOS. You can do that once you get a final answer from them.

 

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-1687251/How-write-best-letter-complaint.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

They actually said that they are unable to re-instate a policy by law !!

 

Thanks!!

 

It is not true that they cannot reinstate a policy by law. It says that they can't backdate Insurance, as it is a legal requirement under road traffic acts. The law is simply saying they cannot sell someone Insurance after the event. It is not meant to apply to situations where a policy is cancelled in error by Insurers.

 

Ask the question as to what they would do if a policy was cancelled in error, where an accident had happened while the Insurance was missing from MID ? They would recognise the error and reinstate the policy, so that you had cover at the time of the accident.

 

I would expect the Insurers to resolve this to your satisfaction, if they cashed the cheque before the cancellation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...