Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
    • and more immediate issues WT* is the UK doing. Ukraine needs these funds and weapons NOW Lets sincerely hope this isnt another Tory VIPal skimming issue.   MoD accused of ‘go-slow’ with half of £900m Ukraine fund unused | Defence policy | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Delays mean just £404m of the money donated by nine countries has been committed or spent  
    • If everyone who wanted or needed a permit could get one easily how would PCM make any money?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Citroen C3 gearbox problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Is there anyone with Citroen C3 gearbox problems? Why is Citroen services and spares so overprized? I really enjoy my C3 until it comes to services and spares. This morning my C3 had to be towed in due to a gearbox problem... The shifting fork has broken!!! Is this possible? What caused this? Please anybody with answers - HELP!!! My C3 is just - but just - out of her warranty.... Ummmm Murphy isn't it?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conniff,

 

I realized the Citroen dealers are expensive and took my C3 to gearbox specialist..... I paid one third of the Citroen dealer's quote... Amazing isnt it!! They also replaced the broken part with a new one and the whole job plus parts were less than I was quoted for the part only at Citroen :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little things that you might not notice you are doing could put strain on the fork and in the long term cause damage. Not pressing far enough on the clutch pedal so the clutch is not thrown fully out, moving from one gear to another too fast ie; snatching the lever, will all put a strain on the fork, the clutch being out of adjustment so it is not throwing out completely. Just little things that can make a big difference.

 

Make sure you leg still has some bend on it at the knee and is not straight when you have the clutch fully depressed, take your time going from one gear to the next, give the gears time to slow.

Then, of course, there could be a manufacturing cause ie; a problem with the forging or machining.

 

There are a few reason and you will probably never find the true cause, but you can eliminate the first few by consciously looking at what you do when driving and make a few adjustments if necessary.

 

If you should purchase a new car at some time in the future, it is always worth looking at other garages for your servicing etc; it will not affect the warranty should you have to take it back to the dealer if something goes wrong and can save a small fortune.

 

I'm please you have it all sorted.

 

P.S. They probably would have taken it to the same gearbox specialist as you did and got the job done cheaper than you paid because it is trade and then charged you full whack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your input.... I am a lady driver and I am not always aware of small things I might do wrong. I truly think I do not press my clutch pedal far enough. I have noticed this previously from time to time, but did not realise it will affect the engine...ooops.. well, this cost me know a penny and a half :-) Thank you very much for you help. It will surely safe a buck or two in future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't think you are pressing the pedal down far enough and you don't want to or can't move your seat forward any further, you can get extension blocks for the pedals.

 

Pregnant women are the main culprits for not pressing pedals down far enough, the bigger they get the more problems they have getting the car in gear, but an extension solved it.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Conniff, and that's why my pregnant burd sold her beloved Nissan and bought an XPic. C3 driver, it may also help you to know that gears should be "led in" and not flicked quickly when changing. when i went for my lorry lessons, the instructor said to let gear lever stop for a fraction of a second between gears---ok if your not trying to get away from a Scaniaman!!!!!lol lol .

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i went for my lorry lessons, the instructor said to let gear lever stop for a fraction of a second between gears---ok if your not trying to get away from a Scaniaman!!!!!lol lol .

 

When I went for my lorry lessons back in the seventies, you had to lift the clutch and press it back down between gears. If you didn't double de-clutch those old lorries up and down the box, much gear grating greeted your earholes. You youngsters are spoiled with lorries with syncromesh these days! Us old timers only had "crash boxes", eeh luxury, you dooont know yor booorn:D (I suppose you've got a heater in the cab too?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you find out what the gearbox type is and give the engine you have.

 

I have had a similar problem with my Saxo. Though my box has the mileage of the starship enterprise. Essentialy, there are indications that the bearings are a known problem. Warning signs are whislting, hard selection of gears. It would be highly unlikely that the failure is due to a clutch issue by the very nature of it's mechanism. The clutch disengages the drive from the engine to the box and unless there was something seriously wrong which would have made itself apparent much earlier then it is highly unlikely to be a clutch issue.

As also the feeding in suggestions. This is a relatively modern box with synchro rings that should cope. Unless there is design or manufacturing flaw the box should perform faultlessly for at least 150K miles with heavy abuse. My feeling is that the bearings have given way somehow which I think is a design fault.

If you think about it, it's just about spot on engineering perfection.

 

Produce something that performs faultlesly with a given time scale at the cheapest cost. Engineers have done their well in conjunction with the specs laid out but believe me, it doesn't go down well with consumers!!

 

My advice as out of warranty is to,

1. If full dealer service history is to ask for goodwill contribution from ****roen.

2. Get the box overhauled.

 

Target price for a good overhaul will be £350 plus VAT plus labour and a new clutch.

 

Also ask them to look at the change mechanism joints, they wear very quickly and insist that if the change mechanism is of the horizontal type into the box that the pin is also replaced, otherwise you will get stuck in 1st or second, third or fourth, or worst case 5th. They are renowned for this and has happened to me.

 

If it softens the blow or helps, my starship is in for a box rebuild this week in fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

another main reason for the selector forks to go is resting your hand on the gear stick. i have known a few citroen boxes to do the input shaft bearing(above) particularly the vtr's. had to do one that had clocked over 42k on an 03 plate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

For thos who dont know im a qualified mechanic and i replaced one of these on a c1 the other week had to take gearbox out to do it! Very poor design im suprised there has not been a recall on them yet as citroen told me when i rang for price on the part ''we sell a lot of these''! The new one we got looked flimsier than the one i took off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
For thos who dont know im a qualified mechanic and i replaced one of these on a c1 the other week had to take gearbox out to do it! Very poor design im suprised there has not been a recall on them yet as citroen told me when i rang for price on the part ''we sell a lot of these''! The new one we got looked flimsier than the one i took off!

 

Hi Miket368

I have just got my C3 in the garage as it was making a lot of noise on start up & sometimes slipped out of gear. Anyway i got a call saying it was the bearings but have exploded making a mess of the inside of the gearbox. I was told he was on the hunt for a used/cheaper alternative than a new one. I have just had a call saying they found someone with a gearbox & gears as mine was damaged. I had a few options either to repair what they could & put back in which would have a loud noise then sell it on. The second to get the parts most needed but was at a lower ratio gears so 5th would be like a 4th gear at a cost of £950 with a clutch all in or a new gearbox costing £1500 but around £2000 to put in. So i had only one option but to say go ahead with the £950 option. If i knew what was wrong i might have gone with a gearbox place but i didn't know or better still if i could have had a mate like you living near by. This is my first diesel car & first car since my last one 2 years ago. It has come to be a very expensive buy. :| Well that's my winge over :violin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome jandy. Perhaps now you have reopened this 4 year old thread, he might come back and tell us how he got on.

 

Hi conniff

Thanks.......... I know it was an old thread but better than no thread at all eh! If we comment more it will help us all in problems in life i guess! I have found a few other forums too but only joined this one!:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...