Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arnold Clark Problems...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4742 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi!

 

Im new here and I wish I had found this website sooner!

 

My story goes back to the start of this year. I had found a full time job in October 2009 which I needed to fund the running of a car.

 

The job had a 3 month probation period which I passed with no problems what so ever, the week before my probation was due to expire I started looking around for a car. Fortunately, where I live there are 3 Arnold Clarks within 2 minutes of each other.

 

To cut a long story short, I had found the car I wanted and started to speak with the salesman, who was very helpfull/proffesional to an extent. The total sum of the car and warranty plan was £5825. I had to pay £100 deposit to "see" the car as it wasn't at that branch. All paper work was carried out and signed and I was promised a call back regarding the outcome of the finance application. 2 days later I received a voicemail from the salesman to inform me that finance was accepted without any problems, just had to wait on the car.

 

This is where it goes down hill. 1 week has passed, no sign of the car, give them a call back and they say that there is a delay in getting cars shipped down. 2 weeks have passed, still no sign of the car (Getting impatient by this point). Call them again and they said the guy who runs the depot isnt pulling his weight and orders are still delayed.

 

By week 3 I decide that Ive had enough and I go in and ask them to cancel the order and put the deposit on another car with the same warranty which made the car the exact same price as before. I wait another week, still no sign of the car and I get a phone call from Arnold Clark to say that finance has been declined because I had applied already, they reapplied me for a 6K loan again!. :-x Even though the car was the exact same make/model/price.

 

I decide to cancel the order and get my £100 back. I then ask what the hold up was and they said that on the 1st order, they advised that the car was waiting to be dispatched from a lease company to Arnold Clark. :-x That basically tells me that I had paid a £100 deposit and applied for finance for a car that Arnold Clark didnt even own yet (Is this legal). I just left it at that and thanked the salesman for all his help.

 

I then go to have a look at my credit expert report and my heart sank, my report was destroyed, Arnold clark had caused 7 searches, all for the same amount within 1 month. As you can imagine, this can destroy your credit rating.

 

I feel as if I have been let down badly by such a "big" company, and by the end of it all, I was accpeted for finance the first time on a car they didnt own and then declined the 2nd time because they re-applied for the same amount.

 

Sorry if I kept ranting! I have written 2 letters (Full A4) only to receive a few lines back from the branch manager saying that nothing can be done about it and that each car taken on finance has to be applied for.

 

My main problem here is the fact that I cant apply for credit anywhere for at least a few years now! I am still young and will be looking at renting/mortgages shortly and this isnt going to be any fun :(

 

I thank anyone in advance who can shed some light on what my options are for this nightmare!

 

Cheers! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, LB89.

 

I'll move this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, wasnt too sure where to post as im a "Newbie" so thought this would be the best section, as I live in Scotland!

 

Cheers though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading Standards first, then if no joy, the local papers.

Can you tell us roughly, what general area in Scotland you are from. I ask this as I may be able to tell you who in TS to contact. Fife and Perth TS already have complaints lodged on Arnold Shark. Maybe "Raw Deal" in the Sunday Post would help---it's only a few weeks ago that they did a sizeable article on this diabolical company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Arnold Clark in question is the Ford branch in Greenock. I just feel as if they are taking you for granted. Im waiting for Credit Expert to get back to me about the searches on my credit report regarding this matter.

 

Cheers! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Arnold Clark Company Rep

Hi, I have read your post, and would like to help if I can, I would be grateful if you could contact me on [email protected] - and if there is anything I can do to assist I would be happy to try.

 

Kind Regards

 

Alasdair

Arnold Clark Customer Services

Link to post
Share on other sites

LB89, hope your not in a hurry for help from Alisdair Craig. I reported my problem to him several months ago, and despite email confirmation that he would look into it with a "senior" person, I have heard Nothing since.

I think they are playing "Childish" as they probably found out that I had been to Trading Standards.

I hold a shared opinion that some senior employees of AC will not deal with anyone who has an ounce of intellect in their body.

All this, and my complaints were relatively minor compared to yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who did they get you finance with the first time?

 

Unfortunately Arnold Clark may be large in terms of acreage but with a backstreet attitude in terms of service.

You can bet your life that the finance they got was with a very high interest company such as 'Yes'.

 

It seems as if they have conned you into paying to transport a car to their Greenock branch. You can reject the car under the Distance Selling Regulations anyway as soon as you see it and they then have 30 days to refund any money paid.

 

I would take no more nonsense from them, take or send a letter cancelling the order again and give them 7 days to refund your deposit. Tell them that if the funds aren't returned within the 7 days, you will issue a small claims summons without further notice.

 

You can email the same to Alastair as well.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Arnold Clark Company Rep

Scaniaman, I'm sorry if I have let you down, but as I do not know your details I can't make any comment - I would like to try to make things better if you contact me?

 

Alasdair

Arnold Clark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scaniaman, I'm sorry if I have let you down, but as I do not know your details I can't make any comment - I would like to try to make things better if you contact me?

 

Alasdair

Arnold Clark

Get Scott Wilson (general manager?????????) to check his emails and all shall be revealed. He says mine come through on spam???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff, re your post 9# Finance. Maybe not always the case. I told them the apr i was prepared too pay and they got me finance at that rate.

Problems only arose when faults developed on the car and i contacted the finance co. (santander) Then i realised i had not been sold normal HP, but something i had never heard of before called a "Motor Loan". I thought this was just a new name for HP since many old terms are now defunct and replaced with something trendy ( in the younger generations eyes).

It transpired that this Motor Loan was in fact a personal loan, and santander didn't want to know of my problems, as long as the payments were being met. EVENTUALLY, santander wrote me and said they had no interest in the goods purchased, yet they called it a motor loan. Wonder if they would have repossed the car if payments not met. It happened to a woman, as reported in last weeks paper, but i don't know exactly what loan she had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Arnold Clark Company Rep

Scaniaman - I can by all means get e-mails checked, but in order to have anything revealed, I still need to know who you are. Therefore, can you email me on [email protected] , with your personal details and car reg etc and I can look into it?

 

Alasdair

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scaniaman - I can by all means get e-mails checked, but in order to have anything revealed, I still need to know who you are. Therefore, can you email me on [email protected] , with your personal details and car reg etc and I can look into it?

 

Alasdair

 

What a load of rubbish Alasdair.

 

From this forum alone it is obvious that AC have serious customer relations problems in their efforts to maximise sales and profit at the expense of customer service or their best interests. Whilst it is natural that a company should be encouraged to expand I have to say that the Sir Arnold Clark might have got his strategy seriously wrong. Yes he might have got a customer service award but I would alledge this is based on the companys advertising spend, something necessary of course but it still doesn't detract that the board of management seem to be disconnected from the way the customer works.

 

For example, you have the balls to come on here and say tell me your problems, which when happens you don't and secondly this just confirms that you think by posting a pathetic response such as contact me will suffice.

 

I refer to a previous thread where you were challenged to sort an issue out . You have made to the best of my knowledge, no attempt to do this which involved basic checks which should have been carried out in the first place.

 

Ulimatly the problem is that AC need to review the way their sales people operate and get some qualified and switched on people in aftersales.The big problem will be in recruiting these same said people as those in the know don't work for peanuts which is what I'm told AC pay unless you are a sales person.

 

AC seriously need to get their act together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow Mr. Heliosuk, you sure have hit the nail on the heid. I for one wouldnae work for AC, especially in the workshop. Why? Some of their "General Managers" admit that they have little or no technical knowledge, and one was so ignorant as to suggest that in their position, they did not need it.

What then would be the position, if say, their was a disagreement between workshop staff on a mechanical or technical matter? How could the GM arbitrate if he knows jack all about the product that they sell.

It is an absolute disgrace that people with so little product knowledge should be in a position to take up to £20,000+ from the car buying punters.

Today, cars are not the relatively simple things they used to be. Modern technology requires that all those concerned in the retail side of the industry be fully trained and knowledgable, complete with the appropriate certificates. Retail car sales is the only job i know of where a complete dunderheid in a suit is allowed to operate. (say perhaps politicians).

Noo then, lets be perfectly clear about whats gaun on here. All the clark mob are daen is to play on the vulernability of the average punter. Only the ones with some savy will have found this website. There are thousands of happy clark customers, but i pit it tae you that theres a heck of a lot who are happy in their ignorance of whats really gaun on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that it was accepted by Barclays Partner Finance. I have received my £100 refund without delay. Just as well I did or that wouldve been even more hassle!

 

I have had my new car for 4 months now and not a problem with the car so far! I got this from an independant dealer (McMillan Motors in Greenock), and would high recommend them!

 

Im going to send an email of to Alasdair and see if he can resolve anything or get an answer but all I need is for my credit report to be fixed. What can I do to get these entries removed as I beleive they shouldnt be there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff, re your post 9# Finance. Maybe not always the case. I told them the apr i was prepared too pay and they got me finance at that rate.

Problems only arose when faults developed on the car and i contacted the finance co. (santander) Then i realised i had not been sold normal HP, but something i had never heard of before called a "Motor Loan". I thought this was just a new name for HP since many old terms are now defunct and replaced with something trendy ( in the younger generations eyes).

It transpired that this Motor Loan was in fact a personal loan, and santander didn't want to know of my problems, as long as the payments were being met. EVENTUALLY, santander wrote me and said they had no interest in the goods purchased, yet they called it a motor loan. Wonder if they would have repossed the car if payments not met. It happened to a woman, as reported in last weeks paper, but i don't know exactly what loan she had.

 

friend has just discovered the same problem...started looking at doing a VT on a car from Arnold Clark only to discover is was not HP as asked for but personal loan (even though the lay out looks just like HP).

 

AND turns out the finance co has registered oustanding finance on the car! They cannot have it both ways!

 

Apologies for jumping in...glad you got your deposit back and hope your credit file gets sorted LB89, and will start a thread on this....just clear this was not a one off :mad:

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have emailed Alasdair, waiting to hear back from him now. He has emailed back already asking what branch this occured at but there has been no reply now for 2 days. Will see how that goes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see nothing in your posts that made 7 searches on your credit file anywhere near necessary....there is the SLOW route to the Information Commissioners (you should complain anyway), inform Consumer Direct (the more complaints logged about arnold clark the better)

 

But a recorded delivery letter telling them to remove the negative entries or you will take court action is the most forceful way.

 

This case makes interesting reading and gives you an idea why you should document everything by letter and back yourself up to the hilt:

 

RICHARD DURKIN v. DGS RETAIL LIMITED+HFC BANK PLC, 26 March 2008, Sheriff J K Tierney

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, and i say again, it's not only the VT problem that a personal loan overcomes, it's also FAULTY CARS!!!!"!

In fairness to the salesman, i did not specifically ask for HP, just told him the APR, and said that i might be coming into a bit of money before the agreement concluded so i would want to pay it off without any hassle or large termination fees. But it was the term "Motor Loan" that got me---how can it be a motor loan if it's a personal loan?

 

Thanks to this site, i have had a call from Mr. Craig, but don't know how long it will take to review my complaints. Thankfully, (time wise????)my problems are somewhat less than BP's. Maybe have to get Mr. Obama on my case!!!!

Edited by scaniaman
Link to post
Share on other sites

scaniaman, I beleive that a motor loan as a restricted credit line (i.e provided for one purpose only, the car) with the money paid directly to the garage means that the dealer and finance company share joint and several liability under soga and the CCA sect 74( i think) regardless of HP or not and dont let them tell you otherwise. Although i dont know the case details this has been proven and is why they record the car details. Not got a copy ot the CCA to hand but beleive its a clear case of implied terms.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...