Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, We bought a part to fix our washing machine approx 13 months ago direct from the manufacturer of the washing machine via phone. This part then failed 13 months later, as confirmed by their own engineer, who was sent by the manufacturer (who is also the retailer for the part) FoC. The engineer actually installed a replacement part, the machine came back to life, but they then removed the part used for testing (and ours reinstalled) as "we would be charged for it". The retailer are refusing to replace the part, stating that they only warranty parts for 90 days. When I stated that I believed the Consumer Rights Act gives me longer than that, they insinuated that it did not, and this was repeated by many representatives. AIUI for goods bought more than 6 months ago, I need to get an engineers report to confirm the part has failed? Or that it has failed due to manufacturing issues? Or would the companies own engineers report suffice? Also, does anyone have any other decent contact details for Hotpoint (or the Whirlpool group)? Thanks, GH
    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sale of goods act BRIGHTHOUSE - just a quickie...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6030 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Question:

 

Would a "reasonable" person expect a Phillips Whirlpool Frost Free Fridge/Freezer to last longer than 26 months?

 

Hi folks

 

Can anyone point me in the direction of specific legislation concerning "durability" of goods in respect of the Sale of Goods act?

 

I am trying to help someone with a Brighthouse problem (as usual!!!)

 

The fridge/freezer is subject to a three year HIRE PURCHASE agreement (with around 7 months still to run), is NOT covered by Brighthouse's EXTORTIONATE optional service cover, has been used correctly (ie - been used as a fridge and not as a rally car!) and has now broken down... well, not completely broken down... it just keeps frosting up until the doors won't shut... (supposed to be "frost free" by the way...) :)

 

Brighthouse have REFUSED to assist with any kind of repair - giving their usual response of "you should have taken out optional service cover", and insist that since the manufacter's 12 month warranty is no longer in force they have no responsibilty.

 

Now then, I KNOW that this is not the case - particulary seeing as this is a HIRE PURCHASE agreement as opposed to a credit or cash sale agreement. I know that a customer cannot be expected to continue HIRING (with a option to purchase) a faulty product - possibly a DANGEROUSLY faulty product...

 

So, if there's anyone out there in CAG world who can assist with yet ANOTHER case of Brighthouse insisting consumer law doesn't apply to them, please help.

 

I've trawled the web today looking for specifics on "durability" - can't seem to find what I need. I'm sure someone posted a guide once - a guide that gives examples of how long a "reasonable" person would expect different products to last... TVs, cookers, fridges, etc...

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I replaced my 18 years old Hotpoint fridge two years ago. Only realised when I was destroying the instruction book.

 

The freezer I purchases at the same time is still going strong and as they are fitted you can't even see any dating.

 

Below is a response from Consumer Direct that relates to an item that failed after 11.5 months but only found the receipt at 13 months.

 

Under the SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 (AS AMENDED) all goods supplied by a trader to a consumer must be of a satisfactory quality, fit for their purpose, and as described. If this is not the case, then you may have the right to reject the goods in question and ask for a refund. The law states that you only have a short time in which to reject goods for a full refund, and once 'acceptance' is deemed to have taken place, your rights will be limited in the first instance to claiming a repair, or possibly a replacement or a partial refund.

 

These rights last for up to 6 years, depending on how long it is reasonable to expect the goods in question to last. Bearing in mind the length of time you have had the (Electrical Item), you may be expected to contribute towards the costs of any repairs.

 

 

Seperate to your above 'statutory rights' are any rights granted under the guarantee. Whether the guarantee may have been considered valid can be debated either way - the trader may argue that by not returning the Electrical Item within the guarantee period, and with a valid receipt, you did not fulfil the requirements of the guarantee. You would have to check the terms & conditions of the guarantee to confirm what information it requires from you.

 

 

At this stage, you should send the trader a recorded delivery letter, outlining everything to date, and making 'time of the essence' to resolve the matter within a set period of time (i.e. 14 days). Make it very clear what you are claiming from the trader, and that you are aware of your statutory rights. It is also worth retaining copies of everything sent, for your records

 

The highlights are to disguise the actual item.

 

Personally I would expect a Fridge/Freezer be fault free for at least five years.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DW190

 

That's very helpful.

 

Not enough people understand that manufacturers' warranties and the Sale of Goods act are NOT the same thing. In some ways, the regulation 12 month manufacturers' warranty, although very useful, has done more harm than good...

 

Here's a few words of wisdom from Alan Wilson, a senior law lecturer at the University of East London and barrister who specialises in consumer law..

 

 

"...Manufacturers' guarantees, or warranties as they are sometimes called, were introduced to enhance companies' reputations for supplying quality goods. They are provided free of charge at the point of sale and come with a promise to repair or replace goods if they go wrong in the first 12 months.

 

But manufacturer's guarantees do not replace your basic shopping rights outlined in the Sale of Goods Act, which allow you to claim against the retailer if you buy faulty goods. In fact, the manufacturer is legally obliged to draw your attention to the legal rights under the act.

 

Consumers are generally better off pursuing Sale of Goods Act rights against the retailer, as these are stronger than those contained in a manufacturer's guarantee and last for up to six years from the date of purchase. The goods you buy must be reasonably durable and of satisfactory quality and fit for their purpose.

 

Big-ticket electrical appliances such as iPods, washing machines and dishwashers should be expected to last for several years. You should be able to claim compensation from the retailer if they break down within that period as long as they have been used normally. Your rights do not come to an end after 12 months simply because the manufacturer's guarantee has expired..."

 

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the company have offered an optional service cover, they obviously believe the product will last this long (otherwise they wouldn't offer such a facility for this period of time. This is business and not a charity, you wouldn't set out to lose money now would you).

 

You should also not be expected to buy a new fridge/freezer every 2 years especially with the make and cost of it.

 

If companys want to offer you something to trick you into paying more money for the same rights, I don't see why you can't use the same thing to prove that they expect the item to last this long. Its why I will generally cap electronic products at 3 years, as its easy to prove a retailer expects it to last this long.

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the company have offered an optional service cover, they obviously believe the product will last this long (otherwise they wouldn't offer such a facility for this period of time. This is business and not a charity, you wouldn't set out to lose money now would you).

 

You should also not be expected to buy a new fridge/freezer every 2 years especially with the make and cost of it.

 

If companys want to offer you something to trick you into paying more money for the same rights, I don't see why you can't use the same thing to prove that they expect the item to last this long. Its why I will generally cap electronic products at 3 years, as its easy to prove a retailer expects it to last this long.

 

Whenever I get offered extended warranties my quetion to them is why would I need a warranty dont you expect it to last so long? the answer is usually oh yes its just that we have to offer it. Their own words then become your guarantee.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. You're both absolutely right. Thanks again.

 

So.....

 

...What should we recommend?

 

In the first instance, I have advised that the agreement be placed "in dispute" and no further payments be made in respect of it. (This is particularly important, I believe, especially given Brighthouse's well known bully-boy repossession policy... (Mind you, the customer is well aware of her rights regarding Hire Purchase, and understands NO repossession can be made without a court order as she has paid well over a third of the instalments.)

 

(for anyone not "in-the-know" with Brighthouse, I would recommend a quick read through of these couple of threads...)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53098-steven4064-brighthouse.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-stores/106348-brighthouse-urgent-advice-needed.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/89225-brighthouse-problems-advice-please.html

 

Thing is, folks, I do need just a little bit of help with this one. I could do with your advice on the best way to proceed.

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the finance is Hire Purchase then it's not the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) that applies here it is the 'Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973'.

 

I think a fridge freezer should last 6+ years (the price you paid for it is a reflection of the value as well) maybe I'm wrong that's just my guess.

 

With Hire Purchase you are right they cannot take it back without a court order if you have paid 1/3 in England. After you paid half you should be able to hand it back.

 

Never stop the payments even if it's faulty sort it out with the trader first of all. If you stop payments they will have an excuse to hold you as being in breach of contract and it might affect your credit at a later date!

 

Unfortunatley with hire purchase the burden of proof is with the consumer to prove the goods are not durable.

 

Once proved it them becomes the obligation of the retailer to repair/replace/or reimburse compensation to value of repair/replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the finance is Hire Purchase then it's not the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) that applies here it is the 'Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973'.

 

I think a fridge freezer should last 6+ years (the price you paid for it is a reflection of the value as well) maybe I'm wrong that's just my guess.

 

With Hire Purchase you are right they cannot take it back without a court order if you have paid 1/3 in England. After you paid half you should be able to hand it back.

 

Never stop the payments even if it's faulty sort it out with the trader first of all. If you stop payments they will have an excuse to hold you as being in breach of contract and it might affect your credit at a later date!

 

Unfortunatley with hire purchase the burden of proof is with the consumer to prove the goods are not durable.

 

Once proved it them becomes the obligation of the retailer to repair/replace/or reimburse compensation to value of repair/replacement.

 

Thanks 118 (didn't you used to be 192?) ;)

 

Now that's got me thinking... A quick "google" of "Hire Purchase, Supply of Goods act" came up with...

 

Unsatisfactory goods

 

If hire-purchase goods are misdescribed or faulty, you have a direct cause of action against the hire-purchase company to the same extent as if the company had actually sold you the goods (Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973). Consequently, you may be entitled to reject the goods and/or claim compensation from the hire-purchase company.

 

If you wish to reject the goods you must notify the hire-purchase company (and/or the dealer/shop with whom you negotiated the deal) immediately you discover the problem.

 

The easiest way for you to recover compensation from the hire-purchase company is to withhold an appropriate sum from the repayments (in the case of faulty goods, this will be the cost of repair).

 

All very interesting, but as Brighthouse supply goods on a Hire Purchase/Conditional Sale agreement, I always thought the "good old" Sale of Goods act applied - as, ultimately, the customer is HIRING a product with the intention/option to PURCHASE at the end of it...

 

Oh, and as for the credit score thing... the reason most people shop at Brighthouse is because they can't get credit anywhere else... so that would be the last of their problems! ;)

 

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol okay lefty thanks never realised that was why people shopped at brighthouse! Have to remember that.

 

No im new here never been a 192

 

Hire Purchase = Supply of goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973

Conditional Finance = Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended)

 

Always import to double check exactly what type of finance.

 

The implied terms of the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 are the same as the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (as amended) but the remedies are different.

 

Usually you can only claim for compensation (damages in Scotland) to the value or repair or replacement! I say usually but no harm in trying to push for replacement or refund!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No im new here never been a 192

 

 

LOL right back at ya! That was just my lame attempt at a little humour... 118 (new directory enquiries) 192 (original directory enquiries.... Oh well... ;)

 

Seriously, thanks for the input. I am now having to admit I am somewhat confused regarding SALE of Goods act, SUPPLY of Goods act, HIRE PURCHASE and CONDITIONAL SALE....

 

but...

 

...BUT, I think the underling point is, as you have agreed, a fridge freezer should last longer than 26 months and, somewhere within the two acts, the law is on the side of the consumer?

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Oh well, after a few weeks waiting for the store manager to "come up with a solution" (ha ha) this letter will be winding its way to Caversham Finance via RECORDED DELIVERY tomorrow...

 

(Anyone fancy giving it a quick check over? Maybe suggest any changes?)

 

 

 

Caversham Finance Ltd (Trading as BRIGHTHOUSE)

Chiltern House

Marsack Street

Caversham

Reading

RG4 5AP

 

DATE

 

(Recorded Delivery)

 

 

Ref : W/POOL 60cm F/FREE F/F SI WH7720SIL

 

(Original agreement number – XXXXXXXXXX – with “optional” service cover)

(Updated agreement number – XXXXXXXXXX – with “optional” service cover removed)

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

The above item was purchased new under a HIRE PURCHASE agreement with CAVERSHAM FINANCE (trading as BRIGHTHOUSE) on 5th February 2005. The agreement was for 156 weeks. The cash price of the item (at the time of sale) was £457.30. (APR of 29.9% made a total cost (not including service cover) of £658.32.) The item was purchased from the Northfield, Birmingham branch, and the agreement still has 19 weeks to run.

 

In January 2006 the agreement was updated to reflect removal of “optional” service cover.

 

On 27th August 2007 we notified Brighthouse (Northfield) that the item had ceased to function and requested a repair. (The item constantly “freezes” up resulting in giant blocks of ice in the freezer section – very odd for a “frost free” freezer! This fault occurs constantly, regardless of any temperature settings made.) The item has always been used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, so we can only assume this is a fault in design or manufacture. We also believe this fault to be potentially dangerous and have stopped using the item.

 

Brighthouse (Northfield) refused to offer a repair, stating that as the fridge/freezer was out of the initial manufacturer’s warranty and, as no “optional” service cover exists on the agreement, any repair would have to be paid for by us. This was unacceptable and, after waiting more than two weeks for the store manager to “find a solution” (which, it would seem, was simply to leave the company) we decided to refer the matter to your customer services at head office instead. After telephoning no less than 5 times over a period of 2 days (and each time being assured a regional manager would call us back) no return call was forthcoming. This is, quite simply, appalling service and hardly the way to treat long-standing customers for over ten years.

 

We would respectfully remind you that manufacturer’s warranties (and, indeed, any extended warranties) are IN ADDITION to consumer’s STATUATORY RIGHTS. These rights are very clear and, in the case of a HIRE PURCHASE agreement, refer to THE SUPPLY OF GOODS (IMPLIED TERMS) ACT 1973.

 

In particular:

 

1- Implied term about quality

 

(1) In section 14 of the [1979 c. 54.] Sale of Goods Act 1979 (implied terms about quality or fitness) for subsection (2) there is substituted—

“(2) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality.

 

(2A) For the purposes of this Act, goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances.

 

(2B) For the purposes of this Act, the quality of goods includes their state and condition and the following (among others) are in appropriate cases aspects of the quality of goods—

 

(a) fitness for all the purposes for which goods of the kind in question are commonly supplied,

 

(b) appearance and finish,

 

© freedom from minor defects,

 

(d) safety, and

 

(e) durability.

 

A freely available guide (based on consumer groups and manufacturer’s websites) suggests a “good quality” fridge/freezer should have a life expectancy (durability factor) of around ten – eighteen years. It can, therefore, be deduced from these figures that a “reasonable” person would expect a “good quality” fridge/freezer to last at least seven years and would certainly not expect it to cease to function after only two and a half years. Of course, the original price and quality of the fridge/freezer should be taken into account, and at £457.30 (2005 price) this would certainly indicates an “up-market” quality product.

 

What we require:

 

Confirmation (in writing and within 14 days) that CAVERSHAM FINANCE (trading as BRIGHTHOUSE) will facilitate a satisfactory repair to the above item, or supply a replacement item of comparable age and specification in full working order. If neither solution is practical, then a realistic partial refund would be the only recourse.

 

Regretfully, if we do not hear from you within 14 days, or if you fail to respond positively to our requests, we will have no alternative than to persue the matter through the small claims court.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

Many thanks!

 

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but to clarify things you should be looking at the supply of goods and services act.

 

In terms of durability, there are no hard rules - it is a matter of fact for the court to decide. The 6 years is how long you have to make a claim - a product does not necessarily have to last that long (and there is nothing to stop one expecting a product to last longer than 6 years).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, Gyzmo. Always appreciated.

 

I have actually established earlier on in the thread that it is the SUPPLY OF GOODS (IMPLIED TERMS) ACT 1973 as opposed to the SALE OF GOODS ACT that applies in this case. The sample letter in my previous post refers to it.

 

Clearly there ARE no hard facts concerning durability, other than what a REASONABLE PERSON would consider satisfactory. And I'm sure there is nobody (reasonable or not) who believes a fridge/freezer should be replaced every two years or so.

 

At the end of the day, the customer simply wants the fridge repaired. She is not insisting (or expecting) any kind of full refund. I don't think that is unreasonable, do you?

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies - I overlooked the hire purchase point (hence my reference to the other Act), depsite it being in nice big capital letters! As to the rest, is was merely to clarify - there are some people who think that the Limitation Act means that goods shoudl last 6 years. I just wanted to make sure that wasn't the case here.

 

apologies again for my oversight (dissertation really getting to me!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As to the rest, is was merely to clarify - there are some people who think that the Limitation Act means that goods shoudl last 6 years. I just wanted to make sure that wasn't the case here.

 

Thanks again, Gyzmo.

 

No. There is no confusion. I am aware that products are not AUTOMATICALLY expected to last 6 years. The 6 year thing is simply the length of time available to raise a claim quoting the SALE OF GOODS ACT/SUPPLY OF GOODS ACT.

 

In fact, I don't recall actually mentioning six years as a figure at all.

 

However, too few people realise that a manufacturer's 12 month warranty is IN ADDITION to your statuatory rights, and that most high end electrical/domestic appliances are certainly expected to be free from fault for considerably longer than just 12 months. Your rights don't disappear at the end of a manufacturer's 12 month warranty.

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick update for anyone watching...

 

Two days after receiving the written complaint (letter above) Brighthouse agreed to repair the fridge/freezer to full working order.

 

An engineer called to examine the product a couple of days ago, agreed there was a problem with the thermostat/control board (a common fault, apparantly!) and ordered parts to repair it.

 

So a result all round!

 

Cheers

Lefty

 

(I just wish these firms would acknowledge their responsibilities straight away, and not have to wait until the law is spelt out to them... Oh well... )

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...