Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
    • This other entity doesn't know what's going on.  To be clear I had huge equity.  No-one would ever expect a lender to erode all my equity.  The question is - if anyone knows the legal answer - on the basis they have a charging order - could they make an application for an order for sale?  
    • Is this place near to you? I ask for two reasons. If you can easily go back, then get photos of the signs.  On GM and Parkopedia there are various comments about the signs being pants. Also go back to the school uniform shop and ask the manager there for contact details for the retail park (which I've Googled & Googled and got nowhere).  The school uniform shop will just be tenants of the retail park, they won't be able to do anything.  It will be the retail park that called EPC in, and we've seen loads of cases where the organ grinder has intervened and called off the monkey.  As for EPC, aye, ignore them until LoC stage.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Files and DCA's


joeblogs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello again

 

Well over the Easter I had a letter from Robway saying they were chasing a debt. I know for an absolute fact that any debts that I did have were last acknowleged/paid in 2004. I sent them a letter that Brigadier wrote for me in a previous thread i.e.

 

The Compliance Manager

Debt Collection

 

Dear Sir Or Madam.

 

With reference to your letter dated xxxxx regarding debts you allege are

owed by me, take note I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any company

you may claim to represent.

Furthermore I have by personal research and advice received concluded that

any such alleged debts are Statute Barred therefore I will not be making any

payment or offer of payment now or in the future.

 

You will therefore cease to process any data relating to me and remove it

from all your records how so ever held.

I am sure I do not have to remind you of the OFT Guidance On Debt Collection

2003/2011 and the pursute of Statute Barred debt an in particular the section

regarding the sale of statute barred debt without informaing the purchaser of the

status of the debt.

Send it recorded delivery.

 

Recently I received a reply from Robway and could do with your advice on what to do next please.

 

Dear J Blogs

 

Further to your recent letter, the contents of which are noted, we write to clarify our position.

 

Even if you were to demonstrate that this debt is statute barred it does not mean that the debt does not legally exist or that we are not entitled to ask for payment.

 

However we are prepared to offer you a substantial reduction with very favourable terms to clear your liability once and for all, and ask that you contact us to discuss this further.

 

 

Any advice folks? By the way, the letter did no appear to be a computer generated letter.

 

Thanks to you all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The diccount shows it is SB Soooooooo

 

Dear Pratt,

Ref:xxxxxxxxx

 

I write inregard to your letter regarding the alleged debt for xxxxxx as stated

the debt is statute barred and I will not be making ant payment.

The OFT Guidance is clear and any further contact from you WILL be reported

to the OFT as harassment and I will take any neccessary action if you continue

this matter.

Furthermore it is not for me to prove this alleged debt is statute barred.

 

I await your confirmation that this matter is now close.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What utter fools!

 

Robbersway just want to have the last word, like the little children they are, how ridiculously immature, I wouldn't hesitate to send the OFT a copy of that puerile missive, as for replying back to them, I (personally) wouldn't, and when they (or if) wrote again asking for payment, I would string them up, once they are informed it is SB they are unable to pursue it further, a second letter begging for payment would be all the proof you would need, and another nail in their coffin. What imbeciles, seriously? I would love them to start chasing me for one of my debts, then I would know I could rest on my laurels and sleep easy knowing the most inept incompetent circus outfit has the lemon.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What utter fools!

 

Robbersway just want to have the last word, like the little children they are, how ridiculously immature, I wouldn't hesitate to send the OFT a copy of that puerile missive, as for replying back to them, I (personally) wouldn't, and when they (or if) wrote again asking for payment, I would string them up, once they are informed it is SB they are unable to pursue it further, a second letter begging for payment would be all the proof you would need, and another nail in their coffin. What imbeciles, seriously? I would love them to start chasing me for one of my debts, then I would know I could rest on my laurels and sleep easy knowing the most inept incompetent circus outfit has the lemon.

Hi Boo,

I refrained from using your superb put down response, perhaps I should have used it:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I refrained from using your superb put down response, perhaps I should have used it:madgrin:

 

I had to water it down somewhat...:madgrin:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh thanks so much Brigadier and Bazooka. So what shall I do?

 

1. Write as the Brigadier suggested or

2. Complain to OFT and send them a copy of Robway's letter (is there a template for complaining to OFT) or

3. Should I do nothing and wait to see if they send a second begging letter then complain and send them both off to OFT.

 

Your advice is invaulable, thanks so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh thanks so much Brigadier and Bazooka. So what shall I do?

 

1. Write as the Brigadier suggested or

2. Complain to OFT and send them a copy of Robway's letter (is there a template for complaining to OFT) or

3. Should I do nothing and wait to see if they send a second begging letter then complain and send them both off to OFT.

 

Your advice is invaulable, thanks so much.

 

do steps 1 and 2 also maybe complain to the ombudsman too an FSA complaint costs them money and they wont like that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brigadier

 

I have been on the OFT website and can only see a Complaint Form link for advisers or third party organisations. Is there a link for a Complain Form that I would be able to complete?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi if you e-mail the OFT they will send you a form or you can type

out your complaint but it must be in a logical order of events leading

to your reason for the complaint.

Alternatively phone and get a form.

Please note the OFT does no respond to individuals but

a data is logged for use on licence renewalls etc.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brigadier

 

Many thanks for all your help. Is it difficult to involve the Ombudsman?

 

What I am considering doing is ignoring their recent letter, see if they write again (sure the will) then post on here to update you of the contents, then take them to town. What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOS will expect you to have exhausted all the

complaints procedures of the creditor before

putting a case to them.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robbers Way are really unable to push the stop button on their threatomatic machine - I fully believe it does not have this facility anyway.

 

The deluded debt industry 'believe' that they have a 'moral duty' to remind people that the alleged debt still exists and still needs to be paid - by offering a huge discount they are proving that they are hopeful you will fall for their stance and pay up out of guilt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I understand now. So in your opinion, shall I respond now with your letter or wait?

Personally I would send the letter now otherwise this will go round in circles.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
I think that there is a connection between people checking credit records and then receiving letters from DCA's out of the blue. It is possible that the credit reference agencies send out alert warnings that the credit record has been checked. The DCA's are then able to check these with their records and send chaser letters to the new address.

 

I don't know this for sure, but it is one heck of a coincidence that people get 'out of the blue' debt chasers shortly after checking credit records.

 

Exactly the same thing is happening to me. After checking my file with credit expert I have received three different DCA letters from different companies. Coincidence ? Hmmmm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's get some sense into the Checking personal CRA files

is not seen by anyone but bthe data subject, also the credit

file exists if you check it or not, it's one of the safest and

cheapest ways to make sure you are not caught out by default enrties,

keeping check on the dates when accounts are at or very near statute barred.

 

Most of these ''coincidences'' are because if a debt purchaser/DCA has acounts

in and individuals name that are of the above status they will check to see if there

is any chance of collecting the debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree there the mobile phone companies are

flogging data to anyone willing to pay.!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it odd that callcredit are both a debt collector and also a credit reference agency

 

 

???? explain please.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.callcredit.co.uk/

 

it seems they do debt collection then have a free credit reference agency my sister has a debt collection letter from them.

 

you cannot actually access noggle or whatever its called until you have proved who you are

 

it would seem they could have the ability to collect the data of who you are and then cross reference it with any debts on their database,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...