Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hfo capital limited


tony c
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3744 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all bit of a newbie so please bare with me my girlfriend has debts with barclaycard who then sold the debt to hfo capital ltd they have been in touch with us and are takin us to court, because my girlfriend has just sold her house we had money in 2 seperate accounts one was a savings the other was every day use.

we have paid off other creditors inc lloyds tsb, the black horse and the woolwich. HFO in there infinite wisdom went to court and froze our accounts the total being 18000 in total. we phoned hfo and tried to arrange a payment plan of 7000,9000,10,000 11000 12000 all which were refused these lump sums were to be bonded with a payment of 150 pound a month until said debt was cleared.the interim hearing ia scheduled for the 15th nov, just basically need anyones input on what to do thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 665
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You will get help - don't worry about that. If you can prepare some more details for us - letters received, court docs received etc Any thing that you can scan in with personal details removed?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes more info needed.

have you got the wording from the court order/directions ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This doesn't sound right, HFO cannot freeze your bank account jut by going to court, you obviously did not defend this.... you also state there is an interim hearing on the 15th, what are the particulars of claim which led up to this hearing... thi can and should be defended.

we went to our bank on the 18th oct to transfer money from the savings this we couldnt do as they were frozen we spoke to the bank manager who informed us they had been supeoned by hfo and wandswoth county court to freeze our assets we recieved a letter yesterday from hfo stating the above r.e the assets the bank could not inform us as they would be commiting an offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we went to our bank on the 18th oct to transfer money from the savings this we couldnt do as they were frozen we spoke to the bank manager who informed us they had been supeoned by hfo and wandswoth county court to freeze our assets we recieved a letter yesterday from hfo stating the above r.e the assets the bank could not inform us as they would be commiting an offence.

also i have read on here that hfo capital ltd are based offshore in the cayman isles as these are the people taking us to court NOT hfo services ltd are they entitled to do this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received anything at all from Wandsworth court or have you contacted them? You mentioned an Interim hearing in November?

got a letter on the 21st oct stating the interim hearing on the 15 nov then the proper hearing on the 26th nov i dont think it came from wandsworth cc directly it was from turnball and rutherford the solicitors for hfo but it has a wandsworth county court stamp on it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you contacted the court? If not, you need to first thing on Monday. What other correspondence have you received?
we faxed and wrote to the court manager on wed 20th stating our concerns and worries no reply yet, as i stated on my first post about the sums we offered hfo when we found out all this was happening does anyone think a judge will take these into consideration its not as if we are ignoring the debt, this companty appears not to give a rats about anything my partner is 12 wks pregnant we have to vacate our property we have just sold in the coming weeks and by offering hfo a payment scheme we thought they would oblige, how wrong can you be !!!!!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tony

 

If you are unsure about how to upload and remove your personal details - follow the link at the end of this message for a video tutorial.

 

To be able to give you specific detailed advice to your case - rather than just vague, general advice - we need to see the documents you have.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?115-How-to-open-a-PhotoBucket-account-and-use-it-to-post-pictures-on-the-Consumer-Action-Group

Edited by dadofholly
To Include Link
Link to post
Share on other sites

This company are only interested in money, correct. The courts are actually there to protect you and your interests which many people forgot. You must ring them as they are often slow at dealing with letters.

 

Please start from the begining again. How much is the debt and how old is it. When was the last payment to BC?

 

Can you list the correspondence received from HFO?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering what HFO pay for these alleged debts, I think your offer was very generous, must be a very large amount they think you owe. I do not know how they can freeze your account.

 

I would do a data SAR to Barclaycard and find out who the account was sold to.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know how they can freeze your account.

 

They have threatened to do this to a few people but this is the first time someone has reported them as actually doing it!

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

This company are only interested in money, correct. The courts are actually there to protect you and your interests which many people forgot. You must ring them as they are often slow at dealing with letters.

 

Please start from the begining again. How much is the debt and how old is it. When was the last payment to BC?

 

Can you list the correspondence received from HFO?

17976 pound the last my partner heard from bc was 4yrs ago when she was offering them 50 pound a month her circumstances changed and she fell behind again but rang bc offering 25 a month but they did not send her any documentation for direct debits or standing orders, so i suppose is just extinguished it self until 2wks ago when the house sale went thru, we phoned bc when we found out about the debt to hfo but they very natter of factly said it had been sold to hfo thats when the communication started between them and our selves. i cant scan no paperwork as i have just read that i have to post more than 20 posts to do this .

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have threatened to do this to a few people but this is the first time someone has reported them as actually doing it!

 

Did they know the funds were in there?

 

Think they are on very dodgey ground if this one turns out like the rest - with very big amounts of money you can get loads of porridge - though i can not advise on brand names :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...