Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Emusic.com Keeps Charging my bank card


Teddybear154
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3688 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't know if I am posting this in the right place. I hope so. Has any one heard of e music.com. I have just checked my bank statement today and noticed a transaction for this company for £9.99. On further inspection I have discovered they have been taking £9.99 every month for about a year. I had not noticed before now. I have done a google search of this company ad they seem to be a music subscription company. I never signed up to this company. I don't even listen to music so I don't know how they have got my bank card details. I have been on there website and the only contact details they have is a American phone number or a web form you can fill out to email them. I am not too keen to phone America as it will probably cost me a fortune and can't fill in web form as they ask for email address used to register which I don't know as never signed up for this company. What Can I do to stop this company taking more money. I don't particularly want to have to cancel my bank card as I have alot of bills set up and paid with this card and it will be a nightmare having to phone every where. but will if have too. Does any one know any other contact details for this company. Also Is there any Chance I can get my money back. As it totals over £100 which is alot of money. Whats the best way if any to go about getting my money back.

 

Any advice much appreciated

 

Thanks In advance :x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I think this is the UK address.

 

 

London

eMusic

PO Box 6400

London

W1A 8AW

England

 

Write to them, Mark it for the attention of the Customer Complaints Manager and send it by recorded signed for delivery

Contact your bank and ask them to block any requests for payment from that company

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Sorry to rake up a old thread but I'm still having problems with this company EMUSIC. I have sent so many letters to the address stated above and any other address I have found and haven't had one reply. I have tried emailing them hundreds of times as they have now changed there online contact system but again have had no replies I have phoned the American telephone number and have spent a fortune on phone calls just to be told no one can help me.

I have contacted my bank and have asked them to block payments from this company many times but the company still manages to take money.

 

I have cancelled and changed my bank card twice and still they manage to take money. I just don't understand it and don't know how to stop it.

 

Is there any way to stop it they have now taken over £300.

 

My bank just don't seem to care. I'm with lloyds

 

Any advice would be much appreciated

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very odd especially if they have taken money after you changed your card, I would of thought this was impossible, is the money perhaps being taken by a DD instead ?

 

I'd demand that Lloyds take more action, that you have not signed upto anything and that it is fraud, get the police involved if you have to.

 

If you genuinelly have not signed up for this and they have a UK presecence it shouldnt be too hard to reclaim the money via the courts, but I suspect it isnt as simple as this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very odd especially if they have taken money after you changed your card, I would of thought this was impossible, is the money perhaps being taken by a DD instead ?

 

 

It's not impossible as the instruction was given prior to the card being changed. The thing to do is to contact the card provider and ask to stop the continuous payment authority. If no original authority was given then an action to recover the payments via the fraud route should be undertaken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Teddy

 

Write a Formal Letter of Complaint, mark it as such. Explain what's happened, how they have let you down and what you want them to do.

 

Send it to:

Ms Alison Brittain

Head of Retail Banking

Lloyds Banking Group

[email protected]

 

Provide as much detail as possible, e-mails sent etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not impossible as the instruction was given prior to the card being changed. The thing to do is to contact the card provider and ask to stop the continuous payment authority. If no original authority was given then an action to recover the payments via the fraud route should be undertaken.

 

But how would the company know the number and authorisation needed to charge the new card, would the bank supply them with the new info. or would they continue to pay out using the old card details ?, then what would be the point in stopping an old card in the event of theft or loss if money can continue to be taken from it ?

 

Or does a continuos payment authority overide all of this ? Even then, surely a customer can stop it.

 

Odd

Link to post
Share on other sites

But how would the company know the number and authorisation needed to charge the new card, would the bank supply them with the new info. or would they continue to pay out using the old card details ?, then what would be the point in stopping an old card in the event of theft or loss if money can continue to be taken from it ?

 

Or does a continuos payment authority overide all of this ? Even then, surely a customer can stop it.

 

Odd

 

They would continue using the old card. Hence the need for the cancelation of the CPA. Bear in mind that the assumption here is that the authorisation was given in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies. I have never signed up to this company. I had never even heard of the company before I saw it on bank statement so I definitely never gave my authorisation for them to take money. I will send a letter of complaint to Allison Brittan as you suggest. To see if she can help stop this. I have copies of all letters and emails I have sent to emusic and lloyds regarding this matter.

Hopefully this should help me with getting my money back.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know what happens, if Lloyds don't act, then you can lodge a complaint with the FOS, but you need to get a Final answer from Lloyds first.

 

Thanks for your replies. I have never signed up to this company. I had never even heard of the company before I saw it on bank statement so I definitely never gave my authorisation for them to take money. I will send a letter of complaint to Allison Brittan as you suggest. To see if she can help stop this. I have copies of all letters and emails I have sent to emusic and lloyds regarding this matter.

Hopefully this should help me with getting my money back.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Emusic.com Keeps Charging my bank card
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...