Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Private sale deposit not returned


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5039 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I passed my driving test last month and have been looking for a car to buy, mainly due to pressure from work who want me to be able to get around. I saw a very cheap Honda Civic advertised on Autotrader and went to view it. I was suspicious about the price, and there were a few scratches and minor dents so I assumed this was the reason. The owner didn't mention anything further.

 

We had the intention of giving over a deposit and obtaining a written receipt at the same time stating we would get a HPI check and if it passed ok, buy the car. However, with it being the first car I've bought and having so much to worry about, we paid a £100 deposit without any record and agreed to buy the car the following week after being assured the car is in good condition to the best of the owner's knowledge and will run fine.

 

The HPI check showed it has been written off (category C) last year and repaired. After finding this out I decided I wouldn't want to risk buying the car and, with him seeming like a reasonable man, assuming he would probably have no problem refunding us as it is a fairly large issue with the car of which he said nothing.

 

We rang him up and he said he had made us aware (he hadn't) of the situation, and that he won't be refunding us anything. Nothing was signed (either about the deposit or agreement to buy the car) so I'm wondering where I stand.

 

Do I need to forget about the £100 or is there anything I can do?

 

Thanks very much

Link to post
Share on other sites

In private sales the seller is under no obligation to tell you anything.

 

If, on the other hand, you asked him a question and he gave you a duff answer you could have a claim against him.

 

Problem is, it will cost you over £100 to take this through the Small Claims Court. Given that costs are very rarely awarded you would be spending more taking it to court then you get back off the other side.

 

Put it down to a bad experience and move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In private sales the seller is under no obligation to tell you anything.

 

If, on the other hand, you asked him a question and he gave you a duff answer you could have a claim against him.

 

Problem is, it will cost you over £100 to take this through the Small Claims Court. Given that costs are very rarely awarded you would be spending more taking it to court then you get back off the other side.

 

Put it down to a bad experience and move on.

 

Don't know which courts you have been using! Cost via MoneyClaim is about £35 (which you get back from the other side if you win) and you can claim interest as well.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly as Sam says. If you have his name and address and a hard copy of the HPI check, send him a recorded delivery letter asking for your £100 back. If he don't respond or says 'no', then you send him another headed 'letter before action' again asking for the return of your deposit. If still no response, then you go here - https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/web/mcol/welcome - and issue a claim.

 

Have a good look on Autotrader and on Ebay and see if he is selling any more cars which would class him as a trader and then you can inform the tax office as well.

 

There are too many of these shysters ripping people off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He doesn't have to. You did not give him the deposit to secure the car 'for fun', it was provided to ensure nobody else took the vehicle until you were ready. Providing the seller did not provide you with a misleading statement, the fact YOU chose not to complete the deal because of what you found, allows you NOt to complete the sale, but to get your money back...? That's at the discretion of the person you paid it to. If he chooses not to, then it remains your loss.

 

You could take court action but this would only work if the seller misrepresented the vehicle to you. As a private seller, the less he tells you, the greater onus on your to ensure the vehicle is what you want before you secure it with a deposit.

 

As Conniff notes, if he's really a trader, then there are things you can do to make his life much more difficult, but none of this guarantees the refund of your deposit. This is no different to your paying a deposit and changing your mind (which you have done). When paid over, a deposit is simply an initial payment, if you do not complete, then would might get away with not paying over the rest, but getting the initial money back? This would have to be fought for, with no guarantee of success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...