Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Experian - Incorrect information


wotnot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6007 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have had incorrect information placed on my credit file in the past and it has taken me months to get it removed. How can experian (and others) just take other peoples word that we have defaulted etc. when in some cases we have never had any dealings with the company?

 

Edited

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you explian what was wrong with what I said?

 

I'll say it again in fewer words -

 

 

How can 'one' put incorrect information on someone else's credit file? Be it a senior person at one of the large utility companies or cc companies etc. and then make them prove it was wrong before I see fit to remove it?

 

Do i need a consumer credit license or something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Form your own limited Company. There are firms that will do this for you for about 100 quid if you Google 'Company Formations'. You can have your own registered office at an address you've probably never heard of, and don't even need to visit if you don't want to.

 

You can then get a Credit license from the OFT for about 485 quid in the name of your limited company, a data processing cert, and then register with the CRA's. You might even want to join an industry body to give your 'firm' some credibility.

 

Let the fun begin. You can phart about with peoples credit records to your hearts content, hold people to ransom and pursue for that 137.10 they owe for some books/CD's/strippogram they had 4 years ago at a previous address....the world is your lobster.

 

You only have to hope your victims haven't found CAG yet, and you're on a winner. It's the fastest growing and most successful section of financial 'recoveries' at the moment. When the going gets tough, the tough get going, by declaring the Company bankrupt and hopping it to Brazil or Paraguay. You might get your photo on Crimewatch but by then you'll be too rich to care about being (in)famous as well!!.

 

 

PLEASE NOTE: I'm joking. That would be highly illegal.... and it wouldn't work anyway, so please don't try.....and I'm NOT suggesting DCA's are bent....just a joke everybody ;)

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Form your own limited Company. There are firms that will do this for you for about 100 quid if you Google 'Company Formations'. You can have your own registered office at an address you've probably never heard of, and don't even need to visit if you don't want to.

 

You can then get a Credit license from the OFT for about 485 quid in the name of your limited company, a data processing cert, and then register with the CRA's. You might even want to join an industry body to give your 'firm' some credibility.

 

Let the fun begin. You can phart about with peoples credit records to your hearts content, hold people to ransom and pursue for that 137.10 they owe for some books/CD's/strippogram they had 4 years ago at a previous address....the world is your lobster.

 

You only have to hope your victims haven't found CAG yet, and you're on a winner. It's the fastest growing and most successful section of financial 'recoveries' at the moment. When the going gets tough, the tough get going, by declaring the Company bankrupt and hopping it to Brazil or Paraguay. You might get your photo on Crimewatch but by then you'll be too rich to care about being (in)famous as well!!.

 

 

PLEASE NOTE: I'm joking. That would be highly illegal.... and it wouldn't work anyway, so please don't try.....and I'm NOT suggesting DCA's are bent....just a joke everybody ;)

 

 

Woohoo, show time. I have dormant LTD companies waiting. Oh what fun I will have with this info.

 

Hey, new business idea - £10 to put a default on someone who has pi**ed you off! I'll be rich :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woohoo, show time. I have dormant LTD companies waiting. Oh what fun I will have with this info.

 

Hey, new business idea - £10 to put a default on someone who has pi**ed you off! I'll be rich :grin:

 

I hope you've not taken that seriously wotnot!!

 

If you have incorrect info on your file, they will normally only change it if you sort it out with the company that put it there in the first place.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

True, been there. But have you tried talking to some of these companies? They dont give a ***t. I would just like to do what they have done to me, and many others. Then make them beg and send faxes, letters, emails and more letters until I finally say oh, ok sorry its taken months but we will remove it from your file. Then do nothing for another 4 weeks until they start screaming down the phone etc. etc.

 

How can they say you're guilty until you prove yourself innocent? (which is sometimes harder to do when you have never heard of them!)

 

I had a tenant once who moved into a property then called up all the utility companies and said he was moving out and to put all the bills back into the landlorsd name (me). In the meantime I had to evict him for non payment of rent only to find this out whenI was notified that one of them had a ccj against me. Guess how long that took to sort that one out.

 

(ccj removed now of course)

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you explian what was wrong with what I said?

 

It is illegal what you are proposing and would in all likelyhood result in you being sued for damages.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dannyboy

Just to pick you up on one point - you said it would be highly illegal, are you saying that what they are doing is illegal?

 

Or have they made a mistake - which is what I (and others) could legitimately do? (if we had such a company of course)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rory, does that mean I can sue for damages against the company in question?

 

 

BTW I'm joking about starting a company but it just annoys me that this is allowed. Anyone had similar experiences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

does that mean I can sue for damages against the company in question?

 

Yes if you can quantify the damage.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it did put on hold two months of house buying whilst I sorted out the two defaults from B**t*sh G*s (that had absolutely nothing to do with me - old rental property years ago). But I guess as house prices are going down they actually saved me some money :grin:

 

Oh yes and three of my credits cards effectively reduced my limits to near zero when I paid them off in full (as usual) due to information from Experian they said, but no loss there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dannyboy

Just to pick you up on one point - you said it would be highly illegal, are you saying that what they are doing is illegal?

 

Or have they made a mistake - which is what I (and others) could legitimately do? (if we had such a company of course)

 

What they are doing is not necessarily illegal unless they have knowingly recorded false and/or inaccurate information on your credit file. To prove they knowingly recorded this false information is likely to be nigh on impossible, as unlike the consumer they are considered to be innocent until proven guilty. They have a myriad of excuses to fall back on, including the old favourite they were acting 'in good faith' on information which they now know to be inaccurate. It could be a genuine mistake.

 

If a DCA 'phones you demanding money on a debt and threaten you with court, - if they have not, and later can not, produce an enforceable agreement along with proof of their legal right to collect they are (in old fashioned blurb) 'demanding money with menaces' which is illegal, the correct legal 'instruments' must be in place before recovery attempts begin...but how many people would be able to prove it in a court??

 

 

I do know how you feel. It was being hassled for a debt that wasn't mine that brought me here in the first place, and it is very much an uphill struggle.

 

All the best.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Danny, I know what your saying but this thread been a laugh tonight (Brazil does sound good though!). Thanks to Rory too (and thanks for your supportive advice on other matters, appreciated).

 

Its a shame this goes on, they should be held accountable - what I mean is that experian should remove any information that is disputed until the person who put it there proves its correct, not the other way round.

 

Anyway enough said, unless others have similar experiences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...