Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI and IVA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4747 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Consumer,

 

Yes, if you have good reason to believe it was mis-sold you certainly can claim it back, regardless of your current circumstances.

 

DJ

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for that, OH is considering an IVA with debts that have PPI on them, so this is good to know.

 

Would you know if there are any exemptions to the six year claim back on the PPI ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am not sure what you mean by exemptions to the 6 year claim back on the ppi consumer. You can claim back PPI at anytime within 6 years of realising there may have been a problem/mis-sell, if that's what you mean.

 

I believe that if the PPI is included in the amount outstanding, this would be included in any IVA you enter into. Then if successful with a claim for mis-sold ppi, the total amount outstanding could be reduced by the amount of refund. Depends on whether you want the refund paid directly to you, or used to reduce the debt.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am not sure what you mean by exemptions to the 6 year claim back on the ppi consumer. You can claim back PPI at anytime within 6 years of realising there may have been a problem/mis-sell, if that's what you mean.

 

I believe that if the PPI is included in the amount outstanding, this would be included in any IVA you enter into. Then if successful with a claim for mis-sold ppi, the total amount outstanding could be reduced by the amount of refund. Depends on whether you want the refund paid directly to you, or used to reduce the debt.

 

DJ

 

 

 

 

 

 

RBS has confirmed they are returning the PPI, but are not accepting liability, however IVA has not been set up yet.

 

OH would perfer PPI amount to be returned directly, do you think thats likely ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude,

 

Have you already done your calculations to check the amount they are refunding is correct?

 

RBS do have the right to reduce the refund by the amount of total arrears outstanding on the loan. This is called "the right of offset". But they are only allowed to keep the amount of arrears. The remaining balance should be paid in whatever way you choose.

 

Personally, I would write to RBS confirming receipt of their offer and outlining the amount of arrears which they may take from the refund and stipulate how you would like the remaining balance to be paid.

 

Would not put it past them to refund the whole amount to your loan, so best to outline how you expect any monies due to be refunded.

 

Good luck

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

My sister has been repaying her IVA for eighteen months and we have just realised that we can claim back the PPI on her many c/c's. If successful, will the IVA organisation expect to have the money to reduce the debt or can my sister have it refunded directly to her? She is currently under going Cancer treatment and is having a rough time. Would she come under the hardship rule?

 

Any assistance in this field would be greatly appreciated.

 

Shelley

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about when a IVA is completed? Do you calculate from when you pay into the PPI scheme, right up until the IVA starts, or is the PPI payments included with in the IVA payment? I.E, say I was paying PPI payments for two years, then entered an IVA for five years, should my claim be for two years or seven?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...