Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sacked on the spot without warning


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Are we not missing the point on this

 

its unlawful to terminate the contract of employment on the spot

 

if performance etc was an issue then a disciplinary hearing would be undertaken with a final decision before termination

 

even if guilty of gross misconduct, say theft, is still not a valid excuse to terminate on the spot

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 260
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Are we not missing the point on this

 

its unlawful to terminate the contract of employment on the spot

 

if performance etc was an issue then a disciplinary hearing would be undertaken with a final decision before termination

 

even if guilty of gross misconduct, say theft, is still not a valid excuse to terminate on the spot

 

It is indeed unlawful, and a disciplinary hearing should have been held. The employee does, after all, have the right not to be unfairly dismissed.

 

The problem is, that the only remedy available is a complaint to an Employment Tribunal, and being dismissed with less than 12 months service means that the OP is barred from that course of action unless it can be proven that he is entitled to a period of notice which would take him over the 12 month threshold!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see your point but the average time for a disciplinary hearing can be a few weeks

 

in all through this time the employee is still under contract and is fast reaching the 12 month point of employment

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law entitles you to a minimum of 28 days paid holiday in a year - when you say that you have had 7 days, do you mean that this is the only paid holiday you have had since starting work? If so, then I make it nearly 26 days for 11 months service, so they should owe you 19 days holiday pay - or have I read it wrong?

 

Are they still able to just terminate your employment without any grievance procedure or offer of any training?

 

They aren't allowed to - they are supposed to go through due process, but the law offers you no remedy unless you have completed 12 months service. A contract can only be terminated by mutual consent, giving notice as applicable. As this was not a mutual agreement, you have been dismissed, which must be carried out lawfully or it is considered 'Unfair'. Whilst your dismissal is undoubtedly 'Unfair', the debate is over what you can do about it, and options are limited unless you can prove that had you been dismissed properly, your effective date of termination would have been over the 12 month threshold where you can take the matter to an Employment Tribunal.

 

As far as notice I know they would want a months notice if i was going to leave.

That is what we need to prove somehow

[/Quote]

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see your point but the average time for a disciplinary hearing can be a few weeks

 

in all through this time the employee is still under contract and is fast reaching the 12 month point of employment

 

Absolutely, but the OP HAS been dismissed with pay in lieu of notice, and with no due disciplinary process. The employer would seem to be aware that in doing this, they are relatively free of a risk of Tribunal action for Unfair dismissal as they have stopped the clock at 11 months. Letter of dismissal on performance grounds, P45 and termination pay already issued. neat, tidy and all within the 12 month limit - unless the OP was entitled to a months notice (contractual), not a week (statutory).

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have taken 7 days this year 2011 and 14 days in December 2010.

I have also worked all the bank holidays apart from this one :( go back to work after 3 days off and get sacked :(

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely, but the OP HAS been dismissed with pay in lieu of notice, and with no due disciplinary process. The employer would seem to be aware that in doing this, they are relatively free of a risk of Tribunal action for Unfair dismissal as they have stopped the clock at 11 months. Letter of dismissal on performance grounds, P45 and termination pay already issued. neat, tidy and all within the 12 month limit - unless the OP was entitled to a months notice (contractual), not a week (statutory).[/quote

 

 

Bare in mind SW, that pay in lieu of notice can only be given if there is contractual provision for it.

I think this is one that is 'worth trying' for a SER qualification.

The ER failed to provide a WSoPoE, so the EE has at least an argument that it was implied (and therefore in the circumstance a contractual provision) that there should have been 4 weeks notice given. Worth a punt, nothing to lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bare in mind SW, that pay in lieu of notice can only be given if there is contractual provision for it.

 

No - pay in lieu can be made with or without a contractual provision, the point being that without a contractual term it represents 'damages' for the employee not being permitted to work that notice, providing that the amount paid represents the full amount that the employee would have earned had the notice been fulfilled.

 

I agree that this needs to be pushed as the OP has been treated with utter contempt and I bet it isn't the first time that the ER has done this!

 

If only the ER could be made to accept that there should have been a month's notice - interesting that the OP seems to think this was the case.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law entitles you to a minimum of 28 days paid holiday in a year - when you say that you have had 7 days, do you mean that this is the only paid holiday you have had since starting work? If so, then I make it nearly 26 days for 11 months service, so they should owe you 19 days holiday pay - or have I read it wrong?

 

Could I ask where the law states you are entitled to 28 days holiday per year?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - pay in lieu can be made with or without a contractual provision, the point being that without a contractual term it represents 'damages' for the employee not being permitted to work that notice, providing that the amount paid represents the full amount that the employee would have earned had the notice been fulfilled.

 

I agree that this needs to be pushed as the OP has been treated with utter contempt and I bet it isn't the first time that the ER has done this!

 

If only the ER could be made to accept that there should have been a month's notice - interesting that the OP seems to think this was the case.

No. there must be specific contractual provision that the ER can pay PILON.

And there seemingly wasn't such provision here, so unless the ER can show grounds for GM, they should have given notice.

 

Can I just check, from #1 Gaz, you said-

"was for my replacement :-x is there anything i can do about constructive dismissal???

All they gave me in the office was a letter saying i was being terminated there and then, my pay slip for this month and next month, my p45 and a cheque which is one months money, commission for what i have sold, less tax."

 

Did you get a cheque which is one months money plus commission?

 

If so, that helps a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They gave me a cheque with was one months money plus commission for everything i had already sold.

 

The letter they gave me says the cheque is for the amount that includes basic pay for 4 weeks, 1 weeks holiday, p11d rebate for the loss of fuel and car allowance for one month.

Edited by gazhodge1981

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Gaz. I don't have anything to add to what the guys have said, but I think this has a while to run. It just sounds more and more like a premeditated stitch up to me. I hope we can help you achieve a fair solution to all this.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HB,

 

It does feel it :(

 

Looking at the commission they have paid me with a clear head this morning and it is wrong :( it is £90 short and the National insurance amount is double what is is normally for a month :(

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaz, just do what they tell you to do on here, nothing to lose, everything to gain. I wouldn't give up over two years ago, being made ill through bullying at work, then being dismissed on capability. I'm very glad I didn't give up. Everyone who cared about me told me to give up, and move on for the sake of my mental health; I refused to do this and now reap the rewards! I was told I didn't have a chance, but I would not accept this and plowed on with the help of Unison. I didn't bother with ET (I had full Employment Rights), but the principle is the same, isn;t it? You have been wronged and that has to be rectified. So, if there is the slightest chance you can act, then do - it'll make you feel so much better.

 

Good luck.

Edited by jackieandwayne
all jumbled up!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Would someone be able to give me some advise please.

 

I went to work today and at 2pm i was called into the office and was told my employment was being terminated there and then :-(

They gave me a letter saying it was for poor performance and poor time keeping which i was shocked at, as no one has ever said anything to me. I have been in my job for just over 11 months and never even had a come on your not doing your job or anything. I have not been late or missed time at work so i am a bit confused.

In the 11 and a bit months i have been working with this employer i have never been given a contract or job description and only limited training (not enough to do my job).

Is there anything i can do in terms of unfair dismissal, breach of contract???

Also they started interviewing people last week which I thought they were adding to the team but it now looks to me it was for my replacement :-x is there anything i can do about constructive dismissal???

All they gave me in the office was a letter saying i was being terminated there and then, my pay slip for this month and next month, my p45 and a cheque which is one months money, commission for what i have sold, less tax.

 

Any help would be helpful

 

Pay slip(s) for this month (May - ?) and next month (June - ?)

Cheque which is one months money, commission for what you've sold, less tax... What does that cheque cover? (May, or June... or both?)

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got paid yesterday as normal in the bank for may and the cheque is to cover June.

 

Can i just ask as they have paid me for June with the cheque, wouldn't that take me over 12 months as they have paid me for June???

 

I have two pay slips, one for May and another for June

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done...

 

Go for it! :-)

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However... I strongly suggest that you make 3 true copies of that cheque... See if you can get the Pot Office to do that for you... Just in case your cheque gets rejected by your bank... Keep those copies safe!

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd do even better...

 

I understand that money is important, but I'd pursue now a case for unfair dismissal, and keep the cheque as proof and as an important exhibit, along with that payslip for June.

 

Cheques can always be cashed in within 12 months of their issue...

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH i wasn't going to cash the cheque as you said i might need it :)

 

what is my best course of action??? Should i see a solicitor at this point??

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,

 

Do not contact your ex-employer at anytime from now on.

 

They also may come back to you pleading an error made by payroll or HR department. This is when you have to put forward how large a company it is, if they do produce payslip on site, or contract that part of the business out, and, please, write down the names of the heads of departments while they are still in your head.

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Payslips are done on site by the accounts department.

As for a mistake the letter they gave me saying they were terminating my employment says the cheque includes 4 weeks basic pay and is signed by the sales manager :)

If it was a mistake then why would they have gave me a cheque with another 4 weeks pay on it in the first place?

IT'S TIME FOR US LITTLE PEOPLE TO FIGHT BACK:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gather together every single document, note, email, letter, written comment, payslip, etc that you have in relation to your employment... I read somewhere, I believe, that they did not produce a statement of employment particular within the prescribed time (2 months from start of employment), therefore, sit down and write down all your obligations to your ex-employer, including, but not exhaustively, working hours, responsibilities, car, benefits, etc... everything you may recollect which could be of use to a solicitor in order to have your case assessed...

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...