Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
    • Hi DX - quick question, what is the bank likely to do when they get my letter of change of address ? also what is the worst they can do? thanks J1L
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mint cc PPI reclaim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am new to this site and I wonder if anyone has had any success in reclaiming credit card ppi from RBS Mint. I have had my card since 1999 when it was a RBS Advanta card. I stopped the ppi a few months ago when I realised that I had been paying it since I took out the card and had no idea why. As a teacher, I am pretty well covered for illness and redundancy, etc and the insurance would have been virtually useless to me. Of course RBS rejected my complaint with the usual guff about it being too long ago etc so I sent a letter to the FOS together with the last two letters from RBS. They responded about a month later in late October saying that they would be sending to RBS for the relevant information but that with a high volume of complaints they were not able to deal with my case at this time. Can anyone say how long I should wait to hear from them before contacting them again? Any information, encouragement or help would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am new to this site and I wonder if anyone has had any success in reclaiming credit card ppi from RBS Mint. I have had my card since 1999 when it was a RBS Advanta card. I stopped the ppi a few months ago when I realised that I had been paying it since I took out the card and had no idea why. As a teacher, I am pretty well covered for illness and redundancy, etc and the insurance would have been virtually useless to me. Of course RBS rejected my complaint with the usual guff about it being too long ago etc so I sent a letter to the FOS together with the last two letters from RBS. They responded about a month later in late October saying that they would be sending to RBS for the relevant information but that with a high volume of complaints they were not able to deal with my case at this time. Can anyone say how long I should wait to hear from them before contacting them again? Any information, encouragement or help would be welcome.

 

I claimed against Direct Line Financial Services/RBS on loans back to 1997/1998. 7 loans. Complained to the FOS in Aug 08 settlment in Dec 08.

 

It will more than likely be months rather than weeks before the FOS Make an adjudication. The good thing is they are upholding 90% of claims in favour of the claimant.

 

You can always call the FOS to ask for an update on you complaint.

 

The FOS have taken on more staff, but the massive increase in complaints will mean you will still have to wait for quite a while.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks alanalana, I will give it another month or so before calling the FOS. I am determined to go through with this one to the end. In the case of Capital One, my first cc ppi reclaim I settled for the amount they offered me as a good will gesture because I desperately needed the money at the time and I have regretted it ever since as I think I would have won through the FOS. I decided not to do that in this case and to press for RBS to pay the whole amount they owe me plus interest. However it would be nice to think that this will not take too long to resolve as the money would be more than useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks alanalana, I will give it another month or so before calling the FOS. I am determined to go through with this one to the end. In the case of Capital One, my first cc ppi reclaim I settled for the amount they offered me as a good will gesture because I desperately needed the money at the time and I have regretted it ever since as I think I would have won through the FOS. I decided not to do that in this case and to press for RBS to pay the whole amount they owe me plus interest. However it would be nice to think that this will not take too long to resolve as the money would be more than useful.

 

Please have a look through my long fight with RBS.

 

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

If there is anything in here you can use, letters etc please feel free but please ensure you change the details to suit your own claim ;)

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Will do Gamba. I e-mailed the FOS for further information and they sent me a reply that I paraphrased in another thread a short while ago to the effect that RBS had raised a question of jurisdiction and that this would be looked into by the FOS. They then sent me a letter saying again that they had a lot of cases to look into so could not pass on my case to an adjudicator at this time but would contact me again certainly within the next 2 months. This was nearly a month ago so am still waiting. Good luck with your cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry i haven't used this site since i claimed back my bank charges a couple of years ago and i dont seem to be able to start a thread.so i've dived in hear .sooo sorry. i want to claim back my ppi but i havent got the original agreements do i just ring up and ask for them or will i have to write to them also will they be funny about it ,i still have accounts with most of the banks i'll be claiming off .i pretty much know the exact dates i held all the accounts as i have sent for my credit reports off experian and equifax.again sorry for jumping in here!:???::???::???:

:D
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mo2lly

 

I think I replied to your other thread as RBS raised a jurisdiction issue with my complaint as well.

 

I emailed FOS as I hadnt heard anything from them and they said that they had written to RBS not agreeing with the jurisdiction issue (being that it was over 6 years ago) on the 15 December and RBS had not replied - therefore they would be going ahead with the adjudication process.

 

I was pretty sure that the jurisdiction issue would not be a problem as I have successfully won (through the FOS) refunds on 2 Lombard Loans (owned by RBS) going back to the mid 1990's.

 

It seems that RBS and all the others are just deploying delaying tactics - they know that they will lose but just want to string it along for a while to make it as hard as possible for the complainant.

 

It my case RBS replied to my first letter to them stating that I had never had ppi on my cc account and therefore no refund was due. When I supplied all the statements (I keep almost everything luckily) they then said that I couldnt claim it back because it was over 6 years ago and that the FOS wouldnt take the complaint on because of this. Not the case, FOS were more than happy to take it on. So dont believe a word they say - if they can make one person back down and abandon their claim because of their lies they will.

 

There doesnt seem to be any time scales that you can put on complaints being dealt with by the FOS - I have several complaint in at the moment, about 3 of which were submitted to the FOS in August - they have upheld 2 (1 refund received, 1 upheld but not received refund yet) and the other is still to be dealt with.

 

I hope you get some answers soon - keep emailing the FOS, and remember patience is a virtue (not that we have any other choice!!!)

 

Good luck and I hope this has been a little bit of help to you.

GE MONEY - DEBENHAMS CARD

Settled in full after prelim :)

 

MBNA

Settled after LBA

however mistake made by me on contractual interest so going after the rest now

SETTLED IN FULL JAN 2007:)

 

MINT

Offer after prelim rejected

Settled in full after LBA:)

 

to go:

Barclays Bus Ac - to mcol

Barclays CC - to mcol

Nat West (over 6 years) no action taken yet

Creation Financial - awaiting statements since Dec

Goldfish - offer after prelim rejected

and some more

Link to post
Share on other sites

mongbiff

 

Sorry I wasnt ignoring you, but you would be far better to start your own thread, as your post will probably get lost in someone elses and not answered as effectively as if you have your own thread.

GE MONEY - DEBENHAMS CARD

Settled in full after prelim :)

 

MBNA

Settled after LBA

however mistake made by me on contractual interest so going after the rest now

SETTLED IN FULL JAN 2007:)

 

MINT

Offer after prelim rejected

Settled in full after LBA:)

 

to go:

Barclays Bus Ac - to mcol

Barclays CC - to mcol

Nat West (over 6 years) no action taken yet

Creation Financial - awaiting statements since Dec

Goldfish - offer after prelim rejected

and some more

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tink for the information about your own experience with the FOS on this. It is encouraging to hear that they have rejected RBS on the jurisdiction issue as this should be the case with my own complaint which also dates back to 1999. I have no intention of giving in on this easily as I feel I already missed the boat once before when I accepted an offer from Capital One a few months ago for a goodwill payment (I was desperate for the money at the time) and so I determined to push this one to the end. Hope you hear good news about your outstanding case with RBS soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I second that. I have not heard of anyone who has been successful against RBS on credit cards. I asked them why they are paying out on loans that date back to the 1990s and they said because any discussion on PPI was effectively a one off in the case of loans whereas with CCs there are monthly statements issued that show the PPI amount.

 

That is their defence I think (along with timescales).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...