Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I have not. I will probably do that
    • Based on ECP's previous, what will definitely happen is this. They will send more idiotic letters. After they will send a Letter of Claim, and it is essential that your brother replies at this point to this to show them he would be big trouble in court. Next it is highly likely (but not certain) that they will crawl back under their stone and that will be the end of the matter. The slight worry is that if they do do court it will seem a likely story to a judge that your brother has no connection to the ticket, when it was him who appealed and replied to the Letter of Claim.  Indeed I think it would seem the lot of you were playing games with ECP and with the court by getting unconnected people involved and then later deny they were involved. So be aware there is that slight risk. You talked about "a mess" in your first post, and you weren't wrong. Someone hires a car and gets a ticket.  There is an appeal.  Who appeals, the hirer?  No, the hirer's mate's son.  Obvious! There is an approach for help to a consumer website.  By the hirer?  No, by the hirer's mate's son's brother! This is so damn silly and totally avoidable. Anyway, it seems the decision has been made for your brother to carry the can so whatever consequences will ensue will ensue. 
    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics


EssexBoy11
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2460 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

 

I've been on ESA in the Support Group for the past 2 years and

 

 

today i received a capability for work questionnaire through the most that has to be returned within a month.

 

 

I am just wondering how long after you send the questionnaire back do you hear back from them with a possible face to face assessment date and do you still receive your normal payments while this process is going on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, and welcome to CAG. I'm afraid I can't give you timescales (probably a matter of a few weeks to a few months) but you will continue to receive your normal payments while the WCA process is ongoing.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, until the outcome is decided (whether that is based on the ESA50 alone, or involves a face to face assessment) your regular payments should continue.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've recently had my ESA WCA and at the end the assessor said he would be recommending i'm put in the middle group (WRAG i believe it's called).

 

Just wondering do the DWP listen to these recommendations or do they totally disregard them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1, there is no real "middle group" as there are only 2 groups that you can be awarded following the WCA F2F farce,

The SG (support Group) and WRAG (Work related activity ) Group,

 

2, The DWP DM will 9 times of of 10 always will side with what the so-called charlatan acting as HCP ,

unless they have made an obvious mistake,

if something isn't clear enough for the DM they may ring you for further info, but in general they usually accept what the HCP 's report over your and other evidence presented

 

But i certainly wouldn't take the assessor at their word, as it isn't their decision or so they claim,

 

 

Hopefully, for you, they will of been truthful to you,

The DWP will let you know, which could be 4-6 weeks away as an average time scale,

but it may be sooner or longer, depending on case load at the time in each area

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

they said the group where you have to go work focused interviews etc so i'm guessing he meant WRAG.

 

 

I'm hoping it'll be truthful as well but there is so much uncertainty with the system.

 

 

Do you still receive payments while you wait for the decision as i need money for food etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as your medical certificates remain up to date, you'll still receive payments while you wait for the decision.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you where is the SG and there's a possibility of being put in the WRAG ,

 

 

has you medical conditions improved significantly since your last assessment ?

if not then many would suggest appealing if downgraded to the WRAG especially if you have evidence that backs up no significant improvements,

it's a cut in money and a way they can cause you some degree of aggravation with the threat of a sanction if you refuse

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm currently in the SG and have been for the past few years, sorry I should have said ESA reassessment.

 

Ah, I see. In that case you'll remain in the SG until the decision is made, and you'll still get paid at the SG rate.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I see. In that case you'll remain in the SG until the decision is made, and you'll still get paid at the SG rate.

 

Thank you, I just want to know the outcome right now as all this waiting is making me nervous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you where is the SG and there's a possibility of being put in the WRAG , has you medical conditions improved significantly since your last assessment ? if not then many would suggest appealing if downgraded to the WRAG especially if you have evidence that backs up no significant improvements, it's a cut in money and a way they can cause you some degree of aggravation with the threat of a sanction if you refuse

 

Improved a bit and i guess i could cope with been in WRAG, how do the Jobcentre treat people on ESA? Also is it possible the decision maker will decide to keep me in the SG?

 

Sorry about the late reply, i only just noticed your comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Improved a bit and i guess i could cope with been in WRAG, how do the Jobcentre treat people on ESA? Also is it possible the decision maker will decide to keep me in the SG?

 

Sorry about the late reply, i only just noticed your comment.

The JC+ treat those on ESA WRAG in a similar way, although they can't mandate you to take a job or apply for one, but they have made use of the failed WP , which is being replaced with something more evil imo

It's best avoided if possible, As for the DM making a favourable decision and keeping you in the SG yes that's possible, but the things you have to remember is that the DWP DM's aren't clinically trained they rely on evidence from others such as those who carry out the WCA But you will have a month from the date of the decision to request an MR and if that too fails can then go to a tribunal, where there tends to be a greater number of successes

Link to post
Share on other sites

The JC+ treat those on ESA WRAG in a similar way, although they can't mandate you to take a job or apply for one, but they have made use of the failed WP , which is being replaced with something more evil imo

It's best avoided if possible, As for the DM making a favourable decision and keeping you in the SG yes that's possible, but the things you have to remember is that the DWP DM's aren't clinically trained they rely on evidence from others such as those who carry out the WCA But you will have a month from the date of the decision to request an MR and if that too fails can then go to a tribunal, where there tends to be a greater number of successes

 

I've heard a lot of bad things about the WP and it's providers, whats it's going to be replaced with? I'm hoping i'll be put in SG again as the JC could end up making me worse again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard a lot of bad things about the WP and it's providers, whats it's going to be replaced with? I'm hoping i'll be put in SG again as the JC could end up making me worse again.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/work-and-health-plan-to-help-disabled-people-into-employment

 

http://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewthread/11020/

 

There are some successful FOI requests regarding this, as well, but it doesn't look at all good just more money wasted by government intent of persecuting the sick into working at any cost, Seems like they are taking money from one group and distributing it and more to other groups

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/work-and-health-plan-to-help-disabled-people-into-employment

 

http://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewthread/11020/

 

There are some successful FOI requests regarding this, as well, but it doesn't look at all good just more money wasted by government intent of persecuting the sick into working at any cost, Seems like they are taking money from one group and distributing it and more to other groups

 

When they say work experience what they really mean is slave labour :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

When they say work experience what they really mean is slave labour :(
yup, a bit like the benefits cap, where they reduce benefits ,but if that claimant gets a job working as little as 16hrs a week they are entitled to more benefits, it's all down to this the LIN/LAB/CON shower trying to appease the tax payers with their fake statements about the number of unemployed and how well they have done in cutting those numbers , with stories about how they have helped them into work, Edited by honeybee13
Pejorative terms removed.
Link to post
Share on other sites

yup, a bit like the benefits cap, where they reduce benefits ,but if that claimant gets a job working as little as 16hrs a week they are entitled to more benefits, it's all down to this the LIN/LAB/CON shower of crooks trying to appease the tax payers with their fake statements about the number of unemployed and how well they have done in cutting those numbers , with lies about how they have helped them into work,

 

The 3 main parties all look for ways to steal money from the poorest people in order to give it to their banker friends :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a WCA just over a week ago now, is there a chance I'll hear from the DWP before this time next week? All this waiting is really affecting my nerves :sad:
whilst it's entirely possible, it's probably unlikely that you will
Link to post
Share on other sites

My WCA was on 03.11.2016.

 

My result was communicated to me by post on 31.01.2017. That was a 12 week wait.

 

Sorry if my response was unhelpful

 

Thank you, it was helpful and damn 12 weeks is a long time. You must have been going out your mind waiting for the results :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I saw it as no news is good news.

 

Until the result had come through, my jobsearch had been suspended.

 

The assessor gave me 0 points and said that I was in good health.

 

Somehow my several doctors letters did not count for anything!

 

Anyway, I asked for a mandatory reconsideration on Wednesday so I have braced myself that I could be waiting up until June for a response.

 

Their guideline response time is 21 days but it is better not to set myself up for an early response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...