Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Acenden, Spml, Eurosail, Ge money. Are these all same company?


cruzhughes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2087 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If its spml on the statements then they have received the oayments from eurosail, go for spml, they do cough eventually but they will squirm and wriggle and i would fully expect you will have to issue an N1 and take it through the court process, stick to the timescales in the letters, dont give them any reason to think you are just "trying it on."

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Fao complaints team??? Thanks for the heads up

 

is this the address

SPML

ST. JOHNS PLACE

EASTON STREET

HIGH WYCOMBE

HP11 1NL

 

I have Acenden limited

Po box 1075

High Wycombe

HP11 2wx

For written correspondence on my statementsb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's the SPML Address for Mortgage Adminstrators Acenden

Lee Brandon sole director of SPML

Acenden takes all its direction from Eurosail but all charges are set by Acenden as part of the mortgage sale agreement and prospectus

and administration agreement

They just can't change the interest rates as that breaks the MCOB code of conduct so you'll have noticed they are never changed or increased only ever adjusted via LIBOR and Bank of England

SPML only lends it name to Eurosail

 

FYI SPML are not a trustee in any respect of the loans it had as mortgages it gave all Right Title, Interest and benefit to Eurosail and gave its full power of Attorney with the Sale Agreements back from 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI - For Your Information

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Failure to refund all the money unlawfully taken from us will result in us taking further action. I will give you 14 days to reply accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which we will receive payment. If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. ..

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline. Thus take this letter as 28 days written notice of my intention to issue a court claim should you not comply with my request.

 

Just two things.

Have you checked how much it would cost you to issue a claim now?

Court fees have risen by an awful lot in the last 18 months.

Are you planning to take this to the small claims court (maximum amount that can be claimed is now £10,000, I think, but please check).

 

The complaint needs to be made to whoever owns your mortgage now ,be it SPML or one of the Eurosails.

 

SPML has not owned ANY of the SPML-originated mortgages since January 2009.

But they didn't "perfect" the sale of first-charge mortgages so that Land Registry records make it appear that they do own the loan.

 

 

Barclays Bank made SPML perfect the sale of second-charge mortgages sometime in 2010, as a condition of continuing to provide collection facilities.

 

 

That Barclays did not make them perfect the sale of the first-charge mortgages may have something to do with an outstanding landmark appeal.

Which is still outstanding: there have been no final hearings in any of the cases associated with the appeal.

 

The entity that owns your loan is the Eurosail that appears on your bank statement.

 

Yes that's the SPML Address for Mortgage Adminstrators Acenden

Lee Brandon sole director of SPML

 

SPML has no employees, no premises, and operates from a correspondence address at one of the offices of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

 

I would send your letter to all three

- Acenden, SPML, the relevant Eurosail - just to cover all the bases.

 

 

But the relevant Eurosail is the one that owns your mortgage.

Acenden just administer it and

as, on 6 January 2015, Acenden was bought out of administration by a giant global equity company,

 

 

Acenden is no longer connected - in the company law meaning of connected - with SPML.

So Acenden do not have locus standii to instruct lawyers in possession claims to do with SPML-originated loans.

 

 

Only Eurosail (perhaps with SPML who own only the brand name of SPML-originated mortgages) can instruct lawyers in possession claims.

 

 

SPML does not have locus standii to be a claimant in possession claims of SPML-originated mortgages, as it owns only the brand name (since about January 2009).

 

I haven't checked back through your thread(s)

so could I ask:

have you thought of taking your letter and exellent spreadsheet next

- after giving SPML/Acenden/Eurosail enough time to react

- to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), and say so in your letter

(ie that you will complain to the FOS and then, if necessary, make a claim in the courts).

 

 

It doesn't cost anything to complain to the FOS,

and it has the power to order SPML/Acenden/Eurosail to refund those charges,

saving you all the expense and huge work of making a court claim.

 

As I say, I haven't checked to see if you have already tried complaining to the Financial Ombudsman Service but I came back to say: the FOS cannot consider a complaint that is already subject to legal proceedings. That bit in your letter about starting proceedings in 28 days might constitute starting legal proceedings; certainly, I am sure that Acenden would argue that it does. If you haven't already tried complaining to the FOS (which is free, and the FOS has upheld some complaints), it would be a pity to cut off that option entirely, by mentioning legal proceedings in this letter of complaint to Acenden, SPML, Eurosail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the letter off on Saturday to spml. I haven't complianed to fos as I haven't had a response from them yet. Could I try that before taking them to court

 

Yes. But in your covering letter to the FOS, make it very clear that you have not yet initiated legal proceedings and that you are making a complaint to the FOS in order to exhaust all other alternatives to going to court (as everyone is expected to do - litigation is meant to be a last resort). As I say, the FOS will not consider a complaint in which legal proceedings have already started.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they fob you off you go to the FCA cruz

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For Information

 

SPML has 4 employees Lee Brandon Sole Director and a Anthony Mines CFO and apparently 2 other employees of whom haven't been named, this is from Jan 2016

Correct the registered address is c/o PWC 10-18 Union Street, London and Anthony Mines was a former employee looking after the SPML account when Lehmans Group went into liquidation.

 

Acenden Administer the SPML and Preferred mortgages for Eurosail and BNY the Trustee of the Mortgage Pools.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should receive letter today. I will come back when I have a response. But I thought the fos won't deal with it and would have to take it to the fca as they are the only ones that would take it on

 

Others have managed to get some sense out of the FCA - I couldn't - and you might, too. But I am sure the same would apply, about legal proceedings. The FCA wouldn't be able to consider your complaint if legal proceedings were already started.

 

SPML has 4 employees .

 

No. You have not read SPML's own accounts filed at Companies House.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Looking through my original mortgage application docs

 

I have come across additional information sheet

 

could some explain in layman terms what exactly this means please.

 

XXXXX is my partner and lives at the sercurity address with me.

 

Their security is my asset from before our relationship.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

the house?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The house was mine before we were together??? Strange! I originally bought this house in 2001 we had a baby that year and we were married in 2003. Her madien name is on that paperwork.

 

It looks as if they were trying to save themselves the trouble of having to find out - in the event that they start a possession claim - whether or not your partner had any rights to the property (the "security").

Link to post
Share on other sites

So how would that work. We were both living together from 2001 my name solely on the original morgage this was a remortgage in 2006 and we had been married 3 years by that point. So surely she would have had some right there? and more to the point why is her maiden name on there? Bizarre or what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So how would that work. We were both living together from 2001 my name solely on the original morgage this was a remortgage in 2006 and we had been married 3 years by that point. So surely she would have had some right there? and more to the point why is her maiden name on there? Bizarre or what?

 

Dunno, not enough to go on. Whatever their reason for doing so, it is likely it was to make things easier for themselves in the event of wanting possession. As they have used her maiden name, maybe it was to give the impression that she was a commonlaw wife; I am not up to date on these things but I know that for the past 20 years or so no spouse can lock out the other spouse. Commonlaw wives may not have that protection in law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i would take the court route, FoS wont be intereted it was FCA back then and if successful will only recover 8% interest max.

Court opens up the option of compound interest and in most cases is much quicker than FoS/FCA

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LBA first yes if you havent already done that.

 

Which of them are you claiming against or is it all 3?

 

You should reclaim from whomever added the charges.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok well its spml then to issue the claim to.

LBA, wait 14+2 days, if no response, issue N1, via MCOL

 

Unless you are entitled to fee remission, mcol is easier to issue claims through

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...