Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Matt T Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default Terry v Natwest **WON**

    Hi everyone, had some great help on here reading through lots of threads, so thanks already but a few questions.

    I posted a letter received by my local branch on 27/04/07 (used the template here) claiming £143 worth of charges (all unpaid D/D's). Got a response on the last of the 14 day period claiming they are looking into it.

    Now i havent received anything since, am i right in thinking i can take this to court now? I gave them 14days in the original letter or court action and it has still not been resolved.

    If so, im filling in the N1 form now, but a bit confused in the charges section. I have completed the spreadsheet and calculated 8% interest on the individual charges...

    UNPAID D/D £35.00 14/09/2004 1002 £7.72
    UNPAID D/D £35.00 14/03/2005 821 £6.32
    UNPAID D/D £35.00 21/03/2005 814 £6.27
    UNPAID D/D £38.00 15/06/2006 363 £3.03

    TOTAL CHARGES: £143.00

    TOTAL INTEREST: £23.34

    TOTAL: £166.34
    Now what do i enter on the N1 form in this format?...
    Charges £143.00
    overdrafticon Interest £xxx.xx
    Interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 £xxx.xx
    Court Fee £xx.xx

    TOTAL £ xx.xx

    Plus interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £xx.xx per day [(enter daily rate here - (CHARGES+OD interest)x 0.00022 = pence per day)] OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.
    Thankyou for any help, i will keep this updated as progress is made

    Similar Threads:

  2. #2
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    charged-case Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    58

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    Hang on a sec, have you sent the preliminary letter, and/ or the letter before actionicon?

    If you have sent the LBA before prelim one, that's a bit too harsh, you need to show the court you attempted to communicate with the bank to come to an agreement. You should have sent a prelim letter first.

    If you have sent the prelim letter, send them a letter before action (give them 7 or 14 days to respond positively, up to you) before you fill an N1 form in and get it in to the small claims track.

    Do I make any sense?


  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Matt T Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    Ok i sent the letter is....

    Address
    24/04/2007

    Bank Address
    Dear Sir/Madam
    Regarding: Account details


    Due to recent media coverage on bank charges I now believe that you, Natwesticon Bank have been charging me charges that are contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Schedule 2 (e) of the said regulations gives a non-complete list of terms, which may be regarded as unfair, such as a term that requires me as a consumer who fails in his obligation, to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation.

    I believe that your charges are disproportionately high and therefore they are contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Regulations 1999. In addition I believe that your charges are a Penalty. Penalty charges are irrecoverable at common law. The precedent for this was Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor co Ltd [1915] AC 79 along with Murray v. Leisure play [2005] EWCA Civ 963. It was held that a contractual party can only recover damages for an actual loss or liquidated losses. It is clear that your charges do not reflect any actual and or real loss.

    Furthermore if you fail to comply with this letter, I request without further notice a Breakdownicon and proof of all costs involved, in regards to your actual or liquidated losses involved in any breach of contract to which these charges relate with yourselves, and that these charges reflect your true costs in relation to the said charges, and are proportionate to the charges levied on my account as defined in Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Schedule 2 (e).

    Therefore I require you to refund me a total of £143.00, representing the total, unlawful amount charged during the last 6 yearsicon. Copies of statements showing these charges are included.

    I hereby give you 14 days to refund the charges back on to my account. For the avoidance of doubt, if this is not done within 14 days, I will commence my claim in the courts without further warning. This action will inevitably involve you in additional costs.

    I also hereby request a detailed report of which clause in your terms and conditionsicon each charge has been applied against.

    Yours sincerely,



    Mr M Terry


  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    charged-case Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    58

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    Sounds good, is it a letter template from another site?

    It may be worth following exactly the method used on CAGicon. The CAGicon has had a high success rate, (near 100%?) with claims.
    FAQs :::::::::::::::::::::::::- PLEASE READ THESE FIRST!!! -:::::::::::::::::

    Up to you, may be worth the extra time and effort to follow this.


  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Matt T Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    Yes its from the BBC website.

    It seems fairly comparable to the prelim letter, so my next step would be lbaicon yup? Saves me going through the court hassle just yet at least!

    Cheers


  6. #6
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    charged-case Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    58

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    Go for it, though you may like to include a spreadsheet of charges claimed with the lbaicon.

    6. interest calculation spreadsheets

    Try and fill in the complex version, notes on LHS of sheet, will help you with statutory interest calculation at court stage. A lot to read I know, but worth it, whatever amount you are claiming.


  7. #7
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Matt T Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    Ive already filled in the simple one.

    Question regarding interest. I have an interest free overdrafticon, and the overdrawn amount was paid back after the fee had been placed (therefor incurring only a tiny amount of interest), as this is the case can i still claim 8% interest from dates of charges if it goes to court?


  8. #8
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,133

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    Simple answer - yes! The s69 8% interesticon is at the discretion of the courts anyway - so include this in the calculations on the N1 form.


  9. #9
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Matt T Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    UPDATE:

    Well i sent another letter, template off here threatening court action, and they sent a letter back, albeit after the 14day period, to deny liability, but in this instance will refund the charges. Whooooooo.

    So a happy ending here.
    Cheers guys


  10. #10
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06 Authoritative hedgey06's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,133

    Default Re: Terry vs. Natwest

    That's brilliant news!!!!!!!!!!........... ..

    CONGRATULATIONS!!!!

    Enjoy your winnings, best wishes, hedgey xxx

    don't forget to complete the bank survey, and a small
    donationicon to CAGicon would be nice if possible!!!



  11. #11
    Royalties Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm Highly authoritative Bookworm's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Feb 2006
    I am in
    corrigible. Get over it.
    Posts
    21,571
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Terry v Natwest **WON**


    .
    .
    .


    Apologies to people who I was in the process of helping, I may be gone some time.

  12. #12
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad Authoritative livelylad's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    I am in
    Devon
    Posts
    9,526

    Default Re: Terry v Natwest **WON**

    Thread moved to success forum.






    I am not a legal expert my advice is given without prejudice and is purely my opinion only. If you are in doubt please seek professional advice.


Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE