Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Taking out assurance when you get a mortgage


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry, if this has been covered in another thread, but needed to ask direct so I can get my head around it. :p

Ok, is it really advisable to take out assurance when we get our house? We (me and the OH) have spoken to quite a few people half say yes, take it our you need the protect in case one of us falls ill, or dies. The other say no, and that it is a waste of money.

We got a quote through our mortgage brooker for £100 a month, which just seems ridiculous. I had a quick look through a few comparison websites and the cheapest quote was £30 for a decreasing mortgage?? with critical illness.

So, can someone advise on what we need and what the cheapest option is??

Thanks, ever so. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an insurance exert but would advise the cheapest term assurance you can afford that will pay off the mortgage. Take into account any insurance that you may have as part of a work pension scheme, and insure for the amount to pay the mortgage off in the event of death to cover the other partner.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got ripped off with that wholem thing too.I now have level term instead of decreasing terem as per the mortgage companies (which pays out the total amount , even towards the end of mortgage which would leave kids with nest egg).

Saved myself £51.00 per month and the lovely bank do not get any commission on this.

Hip hip Hooray.

Critical illness is something that you should think about, but will depend on your own circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got ripped off with that wholem thing too.I now have level term instead of decreasing terem as per the mortgage companies (which pays out the total amount , even towards the end of mortgage which would leave kids with nest egg).

Saved myself £51.00 per month and the lovely bank do not get any commission on this.

Hip hip Hooray.

Critical illness is something that you should think about, but will depend on your own circumstances.

 

Who did you go with??

AND

What is the difference between level term and decreasing term???

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who did you go with??

AND

What is the difference between level term and decreasing term???

Thanks

 

Level term cover stays the same for life of policy

Reducing term cover decreases year on year (supposed to be in line with mortgage balance)

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, didnt see the second part of the question.

Deceasing Term

Basically if you snuff it 24 years into your mortgage (don't forget that you will be older and perhaps more likely to be ill, the company will ony pay out the remaining balance on your mortgage).

Level Term

If say, the mortgage at present is £100,000 , the company will always pay £100,000. should you be 1 year or 24 years into it.

So, in 24 years time I will be in my 50s and should I die , my kiddies will get the £100, 000 minus the remaining balnce on the mortgage

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'd definitely get some life assurance to cover the amount of your mortgage. However, it sounds like you're talking about Payment Protection insurance too (aka Accident, Sickness and Unemployment insurance). Whether you get this depends upon your attitude to risk. As somebody who's worked in the PP claims dept, I don't think it's worth the paper it's written on. Yes, it'll cover you if something terrible happens but you'll be paying the premium every month for 25 years, for something that's probably quite unlikely. You need to think about how you'd cope e.g. if you got made redundant, wouldn't you just get another job!? These policies often have restrictions e.g. don't pay out for first 3 months that you're off work or are very specific e.g. certain types of medical conditions but not others. You have to weigh up your personal circumstances e.g. do you have savings or famioly to fall back on against the total premium you'd be paying and the chances of you getting ill.

21/8/06 Intelligent Finance - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

1/9/06 Intelligent Finance Prelim Approach letter requesting refund of £319 charges

10/9/06 Intelligent Finance LBA sent

26/9/06 Moneyclaim Online filed - £385.88

12/10/06 Settlement of £415.88

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the matter of whether to take out insurance is rather too complicated to be covered in a couple of sentences.

 

If you ask the question "how much insurance do I need if my OH dies?" the answer is highly unlikely to be "exactly enough to cover the mortgage". I would really recommend giving a bit more thought to what you would need in case one or other of you dies, and taking out the necessary cover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do mortgage companies still require you to have life assurance? I thought that was less common these days (mine certainly doesn't).

 

I was encouraging the OP to look at the issue in the wider context of financial planning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do mortgage companies still require you to have life assurance? I thought that was less common these days (mine certainly doesn't).

 

We are in the process of selling and buying and have been told by our Solicitor that you do no have to have life cover it is optional...

 

however we will be getting life cover, as I would hate to think I left hubby with the mortgage to pay.

 

I personally think that you used to have to have life insurance but it appears it is optional now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I HAVE MY DECREASING TERM ASSURANCE WITH LEGAL AND GENERAL - JOINT POLICY WITH MY WIFE AND WE PAY A FIXED PREMIUM OF £10.50 PER MONTH FOR £50K WORTH OF COVER (MORTGAGE ONLY £49k). THE POLICY IS LIFE INSURANCE WITH TERMINAL ILLNESS COVER

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd definitely get some life assurance to cover the amount of your mortgage. However, it sounds like you're talking about Payment Protection insurance too (aka Accident, Sickness and Unemployment insurance). Whether you get this depends upon your attitude to risk. As somebody who's worked in the PP claims dept, I don't think it's worth the paper it's written on. Yes, it'll cover you if something terrible happens but you'll be paying the premium every month for 25 years, for something that's probably quite unlikely. You need to think about how you'd cope e.g. if you got made redundant, wouldn't you just get another job!? These policies often have restrictions e.g. don't pay out for first 3 months that you're off work or are very specific e.g. certain types of medical conditions but not others. You have to weigh up your personal circumstances e.g. do you have savings or famioly to fall back on against the total premium you'd be paying and the chances of you getting ill.

 

Based on experience, I'd agree with this 100%.

 

Life insurance is a must, but payment protection - forget it.

 

Incidentally, I have Level Term life cover through work - it pays out £100,000 should one of us die, for £10 pm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest weegirl

Insurance is something that can be tailored to personal circumstances.

The payments may seem like a waste at the time, the thing is, you don't realise how important it is until you need to claim.

 

You need to add up your savings, other insurances, etc. You may have enough to pay your mortgage if you take temporarily ill, or you may have your home re-possessed. The banks normally are more expensive than independents, but as already stated, bargin bucket insurances may not be good value either. Talk to a reputable company.

 

I personally have my home insured to the eyeballs, critical illness included as I couldn't afford the payments if I took ill.

 

The credit cards can take a running jump though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...