Thread: Help...please!!!!!

I think I may have messed up my court claim. I have issued against Barclaycard @ Northampton as opposed to Barclays Bank PLC........I am now at the aq stage.

Part of the defence states 'Barclaycard is a trading division of Barclays Bank PLC and not a legal entity in its own right.'

Will this be thrown out or should I carry on regardless??

Thank for your help,

Chris.

Hi Chris... If you read the jordash thread..
Barclaycard have entered a defence and the court have dispensed with aq.............It opens up with exactly the same wording.....The court have thrown out Barclaycards defence here and hes celebrating his win... I think you have nothing to worry about...

Thanks for info......aq in the post today!!!!

Sorry, just one more question......

I have an old Barclaycard statement that reads 'Notification of a change to the Barclaycard tariff of charges. We are allowed to charge for our losses & costs if you break the Barclaycard conditions'. We are making the following Tariff of Charges; change from 08/10/2003. We will charge £20 if your balance is over the credit limit at any time.

Would this be enough to show that Barclaycard deem exceeding their credit limit as a breach of contract, with a penalty charge to follow?

Thanks again,

Chris.

Its only a contract because THEY wrote it.
In the eyes of the law it appears to be pooh.

Their losses & costs are the whole crux of the argument.....

You will be fine..