How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

**JOSH_IOU** · 31st May 2007 13:30

Did you know.

Did you know when you work for the bank you are expected to act within the law.

It says so in your contract right.

Have any of you got a contract from your place of work ie a bank financial institution that you could share with us?

It would be great to see what bank contracts are like.

Similar Threads:

**Rhino69** · 1st June 2007 11:33

Have you read The Theft amendment icon

Act? This states that anyone involved in taking goods or money without the intention of returning such to the owner is guilty of theft! This should include the person writing the letter up to the chief exective?

Am I Right? Any Barristers reading this??

**anon1** · 1st June 2007 22:37

Does the theft act include bank workers assisting with it by following bank orders? If so, i need to hand myself in with my work colleagues.

**indebtstudent** · 2nd June 2007 00:04

I'm going to raise this ASAP!

**MARTIN3030** · 2nd June 2007 11:14

The theft act 1968 and subsequent ammendments has no implications directly or indirectly to bank charge reclaims.
This isnt the first or last time the question will be raised but I am happy to put the record straight here.
Hope this will now end any further doubts or speculation.

We already have in place a good defence and statutes in law as a means to reclaim these charges using legitimate POCs
The theft act is not part of that and will remain so.

**chocolatte** · 3rd June 2007 22:20

[quote=MARTIN3030;876627]The theft act 1968 and subsequent ammendments has no implications directly or indirectly to bank charge reclaims.

Would this have anything top do with the banks lining the governments pockets?

**JOSH_IOU** · 19th June 2007 11:50

If the judge rules the money should be returned then one may have a case.

**JOSH_IOU** · 19th June 2007 11:52

[quote=chocolatte;880209]

Originally Posted by MARTIN3030

The theft act 1968 and subsequent ammendments has no implications directly or indirectly to bank charge reclaims.

Would this have anything top do with the banks lining the governments pockets?

You mean the bank taking out money and lining the governments pockets?

**mailmannz** · 26th July 2007 23:17

Originally Posted by anon1

Does the theft act include bank workers assisting with it by following bank orders? If so, i need to hand myself in with my work colleagues.

Do you have one single case where a judge has declared bank charges to be a criminal, instead of civil, case?

Maybe if you do you might have a point.

Until then you are merely barking up the same tree as those morons who call themselves 9/11 truthers (ie. everything is a conspiracy).

Mailman

**finance seeker** · 3rd August 2007 08:23

Friends, wht u think, The theft act 1968 is applicable on bank.
I'm bit confused. Suggest ASAP.

**kennythecelt** · 3rd August 2007 10:14

Hi there finance seeker.

for clarification, it is not relevant.

However much we might all wish it to be it is not. As a previous post enquired- is there a succesful case on that basis- No!

Bank charges/ panalty charges are however unlawful and that is the basis of the argument and the reason that banks have paid out such a staggering sum so far. Keep going however, you can get the charges back.

**JOSH_IOU** · 7th February 2008 21:13

Since this is my thread I belive I can renew this disscussion

Bump

**JOSH_IOU** · 7th February 2008 21:15

Specimen transaction

Date of Transaction Company Amount Type
19/06/2005 The Uk Firm £10 Payment Authorised
19/07/2005 The Uk Firm £10 Returned Transaction
24/11/2005 The Uk Firm £35 Authorised Charge

Is this Transaction Authroised?

**JOSH_IOU** · 7th February 2008 21:21

Direct from wiki

Section 6 "with the intent to permanently deprive the other of it" is sufficiently flexible to include situations where the property is later returned. For example, suppose that B, a keen football fan, has bought a ticket for the next home match. T takes the ticket, watches the match and then returns the ticket to B. In this instance, all that T returns is a piece of paper. Its value as a licence to enter the stadium on a particular day has been permanently lost. Hence, T steals the ticket. Similarly, if T takes a valuable antique but later repents and returns the goods, T has committed the actus reus with the mens rea. The fact that T's conscience forces a change of mind is relevant only for sentencing.

**JOSH_IOU** · 17th February 2008 21:54

Bump

**mailmannz** · 16th March 2008 21:33

Josh,

Have you a single court case which has made this a criminal issue?

Until then, unfortunately, you are barking up the wrong tree.

Mailman

**waterbottle** · 17th March 2008 22:32

I used to work for Barclays icon

. If I find a contract I'll let you see a copy.

Mailman, don't be so defeatist. A few years ago no one had got a bank charge back.

I regard this whole industry as a criminal cartel. Good luck Josh IOU.

Thread: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Thread Tools

How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?

Re: How lmuch of a loyal worker are you?