Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sneaky BOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6531 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sent my first letters to Bank of Scotland Headquarters on 17th May, using template from Govan Law site and giving 7 days notice, as Goan advised.

 

Still had no response from Bank, so decided to phone the 0845 number this afternoon( Thurday 1 June). I first spoke to a customer advisor who told me they had no record of the letters, but that they should have been passed from the HQ to the customers relations.

 

She then said she would find out what had happened from HQ, after been put on hold for about two minutes, a very condescending gentleman came on the phone an began quizzing me about the letters.

 

When I told him they were in pursuit of a refund of charges he told me that I had sent the letters to the wrong address and they could not be dealt with there, he then gave me an address for Halifax.

 

My sister who is a legal secretary has told that they always send such letters to the BOS Headquarters on the Mound, Edinburgh, and that they are always forwarded to the correct department.

 

Should I just proceed with the next step or should I start again using this Halifax address? This will set me back two weeks

 

Is this a new delaying tactic from BOS? Has anyone else had their claim ignored in this way?

 

Thanks

Alex.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to your deadlines and continue to the next stage when their time is up.

 

If they can't be bothered fowarding it on to the correct department that's their problem.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm having problems with them as well, there claiming to have not recieved any letters, i sent a 3rd copy of the list of charges I want refunded last week, due to the bank holiday, i'm giving them till the middle of next week to respond, if they haven't I will be phoning them again. i sent the first letter 24th April lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try sending your letter via recorded delivery, its only a pound and it acts as proof they are delivered. I sent my first copy of my LBA two weeks on Monday and there has been no word as of yet. When i call them on Monday, they will no doubt say they have never delivered it so recorded delivery it is.

 

To say that the bank should forward your mail is a liitle bit cheeky don't you think? A quick look around this site soon tells you exactly where letters should be sent and who to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

daniel_r_clarkeTry sending your letter via recorded delivery, its only a pound and it acts as proof they are delivered. I sent my first copy of my LBA two weeks on Monday and there has been no word as of yet. When i call them on Monday, they will no doubt say they have never delivered it so recorded delivery it is.

 

To say that the bank should forward your mail is a liitle bit cheeky don't you think? A quick look around this site soon tells you exactly where letters should be sent and who to.

 

I did send my letters recorded delivery.

 

The reason I did not send them to the 'right' address is that I did not have access to that info while compiling my letters. But, I have learned that it has been standard practise to submit these kinds of letters to the Head Office on the Mound for many years. I believe that this line about the Head Office been unable to deal with these letters is nonsense, and that they are just trying to buy time.

 

I am, tomorrow morning, sending the indentical letters to the Halifax address given to me by BOS, I will give them 7 days notice, and have been assured that that is ample time for the Bank to evaluate my claim. Why should I give them another 14 days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stalling tacticts again.

Stick to your guns

 

Remind them you have given them the required time,and if they want to make excuses thats up to them but youre gonna proceed.

 

 

;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE:

 

Got reply from Bank today. They did recieve my letters after all and are offering £230 in full and final settlement. I will refuse this and continue with my LBA in pursuit of the £1200+ they owe me.

 

I must admit the even though everyone seems to get a full refund eventually it is still daunting to be serving papers against a huge Bank. However, I am determined to see it through and will file my claim as soon as the deadline is up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep at em

 

 

 

;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...