Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Budget insurance


HONESTKNOB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6060 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone advise me on this. I was with Budget last year as they were the cheapest quote on my car. I had an accident which was not my fault and the 3rd party had admitted full responsibility. As my insurance renewal was due I ran a new quote through confused and Budget came up cheapest again, around £300 with my no claims so I decided to stay with them. Next thing I get a letter from Budget saying that my renewal would be nearly £700, I rang them and the lady said that my no claims was suspended until my claim was settled but obviously everything would get adjusted as soon as it was settled. I received the cheque and rang budget twice regarding the no claims, every time it was 'being processed'. Eventually I get the new policy through, showing my no claims allowance but it is still £500!! I feel trapped now as they dragged it out so long it's going to cost me a bomb now to cancel it. How can they show one price on confused then charge me nearly double just because I am an existing customer??? Have I got a leg to stand on?? Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work in the industry, not for budget tho I hasten to add. Might not be the answer you are looking for but an honest one.

 

The internet will treat you as a new customer and also give you online discount. You will usually find that new customers benefit more from cheaper policies as this is the way some insurance companies work. Lure you in with cheap cover then hike it up at renewal (not always though). Have you spoken to budget to explain this.. sometimes they will lower the premium to a better rate to compete with the online quote as its more beneficial for them to renew than to process a new policy. A new policy makes no profit for them in the first year and pretty much most of the renewal premium is profit so makes sense for them.

 

Also with some of these sites (confused, Moneysupermarket) they make assumptions and dont always reflect the true price. Personally I stay away from them and go direct to the company, although is good for an indication.

 

Hope this helps...

Halifax + BOS

  • £1300 WON from Halifax
  • £713 WON from BOS

Have I helped? tip the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply mate, I've written to them as I hate ringing them, only to get put onhold and passed around 6 departments all the time.

I had a feeling I was on a loser, I'm just wound up because they dragged it out so long after the claim was settled until they re-issued the no claims bonus, which they already held. If they'd issued it straight away then I would have known the true figure before the policy was renewed. It's now going to cost me about £100 to cancel with them and go to a different company so I'm stuck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

£100 thats a bit steep is it not ! is that with a canx charge? Surely after the hassle youve had they could waiver the charge?

 

Dont give up with them, push them to lower the prem and quote the ref number from the online quote, if they say they cant do that then ask them to waiver any charge for canx the policy and they may give in to that.

  • Haha 1

Halifax + BOS

  • £1300 WON from Halifax
  • £713 WON from BOS

Have I helped? tip the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's something like a £40 fee to cancel and then 25% of the policy if you cancel inthe first 2 months. I'll get onto them in the morning and see if they'll budge.

Thanks for your help Mate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mate, I decided to do things properly and sent them a recorded delivery letter of complaint. I thought this was better than phoning bangladesh and listening to piped music for half an hour. I enclosed copies of the web quote and told them I either wanted my policy reducing to this price or else they waive their cancellation fee as the delay is due to the time taken for them to process the no claims. What is the best approach if they say no? Would trading standards be interested?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, youve probably done it the right way. If they say no then you should probably go through their complaints system (if they have one). From experience dont think trading standards would really look at it unless youve been through complaints and FOS.

 

2 things you could do if they say no...(if you havent done already..)

 

1) Ask them to justify why the policy you have is so much more expensive than the online quote (this puts them on the spot and more likely to back down if they cant explain it and also makes them look bad from customer service point of view)

 

2) Explain to them that you couldnt make an informed decision to renew the policy as the details showing were incorrect at renewal (referring to NCD) and if you had been given a guide price to go by with your NCD you would have gone elsewhere as could have got it cheaper so how can they penalise you for cancelling now !

 

I think you might get somewhere with the letter tho although I have no experience in dealing with Budget (only mystery shopping) . Just remember the old saying... cheapest isnt always best !

 

Hope this helps again mate and good luck, keep the post updated and will help as much as i can if no joy.

Halifax + BOS

  • £1300 WON from Halifax
  • £713 WON from BOS

Have I helped? tip the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Food for thought, i am insured with Sainsburys and after the 1st year my renewal premium only dropped by £125.93 so i went on the money market price check site, and in putted my details for a cheaper quote, hey pressed oh, guess whom was the cheapest, Yes you guessed correct, Sainsburys......Beating the postal renewal by over £150.00 and dropping the excess by £100.00 big big big differance, so i phoned the sainsburys insurance line, and explained all of my findings, the VERY nice lady on the other end informed me that there were unable to match the internet price over the telephone, and kindly suggested/informed me to cancel my renewal, and then buy the insurance from the web site, at the greatly reduced price, i asked what would happen to my NCD and was informed that would be linked together and would recieve the discount in the price, So not only did i get the insurance for a greatly reduced price but also stayed with the same insurance company, i sent the renewal documentation pack back with the word cancel through it, and within 3 days i recieved the new insurance pack and details. So not only did i get better level of cover but at a great price. Will be doing the same at the renewal next year. :) A VERY Happy customer indeed :)

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shywazz,

 

Can you advise though if the new quote was with a different insurer. Not sure if Sainsburys are tied to one or act as a broker.

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello TROJAN just to reply my 1st years insurance was through Sainsbury's, but there acted for... First Alternative Insurance Co Ltd .....whom underwrite my insurance/policy

this years insurance again through Sainsbury's but there changed whom there are acting for to .... Esure insurance Ltd ....whom underwrite my insurance/policy.... I'm still empressed with the huge savings whom ever the underwriter of the insurance is. :)

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I got a fairly quick reply off them saying the have 4 weeks to investigate my complaint so that's another 4 weeks cover I have to pay them for before I get the inevitable letter saying they've done nothing wrong!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well it took them over 5 weeks to reply and say they did nothing wrong so they wont budge! They reckon there were 'differences' in the online quote and my renewal policy so this justifies the £200 difference but can't state what they are. They said if I'm not happy then I can go to the financial ombudsman so that's exactly what I have done. Complaint went in the post this morning. If they say nothing doing then fair enough but at the moment I still feel ripped off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait for the Ombudsman, I had a dispute with Budget as well about something else (amount of NCD, when I took out the insurance I had 12 years NC, I sent them usual proof of this, after the first year with them, I decided to change to another provider with a cheaper quote...guess what: they gave me a NCD statement showing 9 years which is apparently the maximum their computer lets them print, so I lost 4 years by spending a year with them.I complained, they refused to change it)

I took it to the Ombudsman and all it took was one letter from the Ombudsman to Budget informing them a complaint had been lodged and they immediately sent me a NCD statement for 13 years with no problem.....I don't know why they couldn't do it to start with but there you go ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...