Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Electric keeps tripping due to cracks - Buildings Ins company being troublesome


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6158 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My electrics kept tripping out (October), electrician, narrowed it down to one circuit (sockets) on ground floor living/dining room,(no sockets on said wall upstairs) reason unknown but there was signs of corrosion in 2 sockets ( there is a crack in the external wall) and the electrician agreed it could be rain, seeping through, and put this on his quote.

 

Got a quote from a builder re the crack in the wall, and he said that water could come from anywhere, not neccassarily there.

Quotes sent in and claim naturally rejected as non upkeep of maintenance (february)

 

after constant calls etc to see how claim was progressing.

 

I requested a loss adjuster as I felt they could not rely on the electricians belief that the water was coming through the crack, and was told they did not send out LA's, and the descion would stand, but if I could get proof, they might look into it.

 

How can I do that if the builder says without pulling the house apart its not always apparent?

 

Also 4 years ago, I had a leak in a pipe that serves the water tank in the loft, directly above said wall, only noticed when water dripping from bedroom central light. plumber in and paid for no claim made. could this be the problem? I don't know:mad:

 

I have extension leads all over the place Xmas was fun:rolleyes: (was also told that I should get that sorted if I felt it was a problem, thats what I thought I was doing via the insurance).

 

Any thoughts anyone?

 

I am trying to compose a letter of complaint as I haver never had it in writing that it had been declined, it was only through my calling them that I found out, do I need to get a builder in again to say IMHO you can not know where the water damage originated?

 

Have I got a leg to stand on?:eek: I am not a serial claimer, 2 claims in my life time, one water tank flooded the whole house, 2nd some plonker drove his van up the path and took off the awning over my front door (lloyds tsb paid up no problem).

I'm so fed up with this:(

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The Insurance Company are trying to tell you the onus is on the Policyholder to prove the loss.

 

What are you claiming for?

 

If you are claiming for the crack on the wall, the rule of thumb with Insurance companies is if the crack is internal and external, then there is a chance it could be subsidence. If it is just external (and especially if you have rendering) then it is probably wear and tear.

 

I don't hold up much hope of you getting the externals epaired.

 

However, regarding the electrics do you have Extended AD? If you do, then you should be able to say the rainwater has accidentally damage the electrics. As you have a report stating the cause of damage for the electrics tripping is an ingress of water then ring them up.

 

This would only be covered though if you had extended accidental damage.

 

Personally I feel its unlikely it is as a result of a leak 4 years ago.

 

Good Luck

  • Haha 1

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Craigwalton,

Thanks for responding, I claimed for both, as the electrcian felt if the crack was the entry point and was not repaired, it could create the problem again,

NO accidental damage cover:( YES to rendering.

Lady did say(on the phone) if the rain had got under tiles or such and that was entry point I would be covered, my point is no one knows where the water has come from.

I have had nothing in writing, until I got in touch with FOSwho said insurers should get in touch for details of the complaint (this was to do with increased premiums due to making a claim, which at that point I had'nt) and the letter said "contractors confirm electrics affected by water entering through crack in wall. Final letter"

I am composing a letter to them about why the increased premiums, total lack of communication from themselves, and me having to chase for months (could the non notification of denied claim be to do with the increased premiums ie: this has now been 6 months of increases payments they have received?:confused:

Me thinks I will request that they look into the electrics, mind the quote is £365 excess is £100 and the premium will go up (what again:rolleyes: ).

Craigwalton, thank you for making me mull this over, hopefully I can now get on with this letter to them:D

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, update, received a phone call saying re your letter their decision is final, and when I asked about all the other points I had made, it was passed to the underwriter.

received confirmation letter the next day, and yesterday received letter saying as there was no claim, my no claim bonus had been restored and they would be rescheduling my payments.

So I am back to square one, which is good, as now I have a better handle on making a claim (don't bother;) ) no payments for the next 5 months:D and when my bank charges go through, I can get the electrics and wall fixed, may even treat myself to a double socket:)

 

Persistence pays off:cool:

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not back to square one, the broker has come back with a revised figure, which includes the reduction by the insurer, but from what I can work out, (paying dd) the credit company has left their charge on the original higher amount, and not reduced this accordingly.

My math is pants, how do I work out apr: 32.8% monthly rate:2.482 so I can see if the above is the case.

Help please:)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Electric keeps tripping due to cracks - Buildings Ins company being troublesome
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...